Intrathecal baclofen pump: A foreign-body reaction case report and its solution

Authors

  • Benjamin Bernuz
  • Haudrey Assier
  • Hélène Bisseriex
  • Jean-Baptiste Thiebaut
  • Celia Rech
  • Alexis Schnitzler

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0918

Keywords:

baclofen pump, cerebral palsy, dermatitis, foreign-body reaction, spasticity.

Abstract

Case report: A 43-year-old woman with cerebral palsy and disabling spasticity underwent a series of 4 implantations of intrathecal baclofen pumps, performed by two teams. A history of 3 aseptic local skin reactions over the site of insertion started 4 months after the first insertion, once with partial pump exposure. There were no clinical or biological signs of infection. Skin patch tests were negative. Relocation of the system was followed by a relapse, while removal of the pump was followed each time by complete resolution of the symptoms. Histological findings showed slight mononuclear dermal infiltration without epidermal lesions, which excluded contact dermatitis. Pump intolerance with a foreign-body reaction was diagnosed. A pump wrapped with polyethylene terephthalate was reimplanted. No recurrence of symptoms occurred after a 3-year follow-up period, with improvement in impairment, activity and satisfaction due to intrathecal baclofen therapy. Conclusion: A foreign-body reaction after intrathecal baclofen pump implantation is a rare complication, which has not been reported previously, and which is associated with negative skin patch tests. In cases with no signs of infection, skin intolerance must be suspected and dermatological assessments should be carried out. Replacement with a pump wrapped in an inert coating is an effective and available solution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-14

How to Cite

Bernuz, B., Assier, H., Bisseriex, H., Thiebaut, J.-B., Rech, C., & Schnitzler, A. (2011). Intrathecal baclofen pump: A foreign-body reaction case report and its solution. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(2), 184–185. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0918

Issue

Section

Case Report