Quantitative assessment of anaesthetic nerve block and neurotomy in spastic equinus foot: a review of two cases.

Authors

  • Corinne Bleyenheuft
  • Christine Detrembleur
  • Thierry Deltombe
  • Edward Fomekong
  • Thierry Lejeune

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0263

Keywords:

nerve block, muscle spasticity, stoke.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the effect of motor nerve branch block and neurotomy of the soleus nerve on triceps surae spasticity, reviewing 2 cases. METHODS: Beside clinical assessment, we carried out a quantitative measurement of the stiffness of the ankle flexor muscles. The path length of the phase diagram between elastic and viscous stiffness quantifies the reflex response to movement and reflects the importance of the spasticity. The assessments were carried out before and 30 min after motor nerve branch block of the upper soleus nerve and more than 7 months after neurotomy. RESULTS: Both patients presented with pronounced ankle plantar flexor spasticity: their path lengths were more than 6 times greater than normal values at baseline (#1: 354 N m rad(-1); #2: 409 N m rad(-1)). Motor nerve branch block and neurotomy allowed a near-normalization of elastic and viscous stiffness of ankle plantar flexor muscles in the 2 patients. Their path length was almost similarly improved by motor nerve branch block (#1: 127 N m rad(-1); #2: 231 N m rad(-1)) and neurotomy (#1: 60 N m rad(-1); #2: 162 N m rad(-1)). CONCLUSION: These case reports highlight the fundamental role of the soleus muscle in triceps surae spasticity in our patients, the predictivity of motor nerve branch block in the preoperative assessment, and the effectiveness of soleus neurotomy in spastic equinus foot.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-09-24

How to Cite

Bleyenheuft, C., Detrembleur, C., Deltombe, T., Fomekong, E., & Lejeune, T. (2008). Quantitative assessment of anaesthetic nerve block and neurotomy in spastic equinus foot: a review of two cases. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(10), 879–881. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0263

Issue

Section

Case Report