A process evaluation of patient care needs using the Post-Stroke Checklist: A prospective study


  • Bhasker Amatya Department of Rehabilitation Medicine; Department of Medicine; Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-1104
  • Alaeldin Elmalik
  • Su Yi Lee
  • Krystal Song
  • Mary Galea
  • Fary Khan




Stroke, Rehabilitation, Care needs, Post Stroke Checklist


Objective: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.
Methods: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation facility. The post-stroke checklist was administered at hospital discharge (T1) and 3 months post-discharge (T2). Furthermore, validated questionnaires assessed function and participation, including the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) on admission (T0), T1 and T2.
Results: Participants’ mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation; SD) 14.6), 58% of participants were female, and the mean length of inpatient stay was 32.7 days (SD 22.4). At T1, 80% and at T2 only 60% of participants reported ≥1 stroke-related problem (mean 5.3 (SD 3.3) and 3.6 (SD 2.8), respectively). Half of participants were referred to physiotherapy/occupational therapy, and 36% to specialist clinics following discharge. The most prevalent problems included: life after stroke (62.2%), fatigue (55.6%), activities of daily living, and mobility (51.1% each). Compared with T1, at T2 there was an observed reduction in all mPSC items, except pain and incontinence. Participants showed improved function at T1 and T2 (Extension Index, ClinFIT set), from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 (p<0.001, with large effect sizes).
Conclusion: The mPSC is feasible to implement in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and community. It can identify relevant stroke-related problems, and hence facilitate targeted intervention.

Lay Abstract
Patients with stroke can develop significant long-term functional, communication and psychosocial disability, which can limit their daily activities and quality of life. Hence, regular follow-up is important to identify the patients’ clinical needs after discharge from the hospital to the community. This study used a universal tool, the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify common persisting stroke-related issues of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit to facilitate appropriate referrals during discharge. The mPSC is feasible to implement in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and community for treating clinicians to identify relevant stroke-related problems and provide appropriate intervention.


Download data is not yet available.


National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne, Australia: NSF; 2017.

Cadilhac DA, Carter R, Thrift AG, Dewey HM. Estimating the long-term costs of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke for Australia: new evidence derived from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2009; 40: 915-921.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526905

Abdul Aziz AF, Mohd Nordin NA, Ali MF, Abd Aziz NA, Sulong S, Aljunid SM. The integrated care pathway for post stroke patients (iCaPPS): a shared care approach between stakeholders in areas with limited access to specialist stroke care services. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 35.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1963-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1963-8

Bahalla A, James M, Stanley K, Ralph S, Durante N, Mcmullen E, et al. Springboard for Progress: the Seventh SSNAP Annual Report. London (UK): Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP); 2021.

Andersen HE, Schultz-Larsen K, Kreiner S, Forchhammer BH, Eriksen K, Brown A. Can readmission after stroke be prevented? Results of a randomized clinical study: a postdischarge follow-up service for stroke survivors. Stroke 2000; 31: 1038-1045.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1038

Andersen HE, Eriksen K, Brown A, Schultz-Larsen K, Forchhammer BH. Follow-up services for stroke survivors after hospital discharge - a randomized control study. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 593-603.

https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr528oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr528oa

Markus H. Improving the outcome of stroke. BMJ 2007; 335: 359-360.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39296.711563.AD DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39296.711563.AD

Martin BJ, Yip B, Hearty M, Marletta S, Hill R. Outcome, functional recovery and unmet needs following acute stroke. Experience of patient follow up at 6 to 9 months in a newly established stroke service. Scott Med J 2002; 47: 136-137.

https://doi.org/10.1177/003693300204700605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003693300204700605

Rodgers H, Dennis M, Cohen D, Rudd A. British Association of Stroke Physicians: benchmarking survey of stroke services. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 211-217.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/32.2.211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/32.2.211

Wissel J, Olver J, Sunnerhagen KS. Navigating the poststroke continuum of care. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.021

Iosa M, Lupo A, Morone G, Baricich A, Picelli A, Panza G, et al. Post Soft Care: Italian implementation of a post-stroke checklist software for primary care and identification of unmet needs in community-dwelling patients. Neurol Sci 2018; 39: 135-139.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3140-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3140-1

McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Wolfe C. A stroke survivor needs survey 1-1-2010. London: The Stroke Association; 2010.

Murray J, Ashworth R, Forster A, Young J. Developing a primary care-based stroke service: a review of the qualitative literature. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53: 137-142.

Philp I, Brainin M, Walker MF, Ward AB, Gillard P, Shields AL, et al. Development of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: e173-180.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016

Turner GM, Mullis R, Lim L, Kreit L, Mant J. Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study. BMC Fam Pract 2019; 20: 2.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3

Ward AB, Chen C, Norrving B, Gillard P, Walker MF, Blackburn S, et al. Evaluation of the Post Stroke Checklist: a pilot study in the United Kingdom and Singapore. Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 76-84.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12291

Olver J, Yang S, Fedele B, Ni J, Frayne J, Shen G, et al. Post Stroke Outcome: global insight into persisting sequelae using the Post Stroke Checklist. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30: 105612.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105612

Harrison PL, Hara PA, Pope JE, Young MC, Rula EY. The impact of postdischarge telephonic follow-up on hospital readmissions. Popul Health Manag 2011; 14: 27-32.

https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2009.0076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2009.0076

Amatya B, Elmalik A, Song K, Lee SY, Galea MP, Khan F. Implementation of the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) in routine clinical practice: a feasibility Study J Rehabil Med 2022 (in press).

Knottnerus A, Tugwell P. STROBE - a checklist to Strengthen the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 323.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.006

Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel. Post-Stroke Checklist. 2012. [cited 2019 18 April; Available from: https://strokerecovery.ca/wp2019/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/HSF_PostStrokeChecklist_2pg_EN.pdf.

Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226-1232.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90184-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90184-7

Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Chatterji S, Stucki G. Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 218.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-218

Frontera W. The organizations of physical and rehabilitation medicine in the world: The International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med 2019: S130-133.

https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm_30_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm_30_19

Prodinger B, Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, et al. Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: a minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 875-884.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030

Selb M, Gimigliano F, Prodinger B, Stucki G, Pestelli G, Iocco M, et al. Toward an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health clinical data collection tool: the Italian experience of developing simple, intuitive descriptions of the Rehabilitation Set categories. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 290-298.

https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04250-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04250-7

EuroQoL Group. EQ-5D-5L. [cited 2019 14 April]. Available from: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/.

McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 429-434.

https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.22195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.22195

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

Kinoshita S, Abo M, Okamoto T. Effectiveness of ICF-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach with serial assessment and discussion using the ICF rehabilitation set in a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Int J Rehabil Res 2020; 43: 255-260.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000421

Kinoshita S, Abo M, Okamoto T, Kakuda W, Miyamura K, Kimura I. Responsiveness of the functioning and disability parts of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health core sets in postacute stroke patients. Int J Rehabil Res 2017; 40: 246-253.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000235

Frontera W, Gimigliano F, Melvin J, Li J, Li L, Lains J, et al. ClinFIT: ISPRM's Universal Functioning Information Tool based on the WHO's ICF. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med 2019; 2: 19-21.

https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm_36_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm_36_19

Mukaino M, Prodinger B, Yamada S, Senju Y, Izumi SI, Sonoda S, et al. Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 66.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6

Im HW, Kim WS, Kim S, Paik NJ. Prevalence of worsening problems using Post-Stroke Checklist and associations with quality of life in patients with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 105406.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105406

Kjork EK, Carlsson G, Sunnerhagen KS, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Experiences using the poststroke checklist in Sweden with a focus on feasibility and relevance: a mixed-method design. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e028218.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028218

Paolucci S, Smania N. Improving the quality of life of stroke survivors: what to do next? The Italian action for the implementation of a Poststroke Checklist. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51: 233-235.

Hotter B, Padberg I, Liebenau A, Knispel P, Heel S, Steube D, et al. Identifying unmet needs in long-term stroke care using in-depth assessment and the Post-Stroke Checklist - The Managing Aftercare for Stroke (MAS-I) study. Eur Stroke J 2018; 3: 237-245.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987318771174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987318771174

Ullberg T, Mansson K, Berhin I, Pessah-Rasmussen H. Comprehensive and structured 3-month stroke follow-up using the Post-stroke Checklist (The Struct-FU study): a feasibility and explorative study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30: 105482.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105482

Delpont B, Blanc C, Osseby GV, Hervieu-Begue M, Giroud M, Bejot Y. Pain after stroke: a review. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2018; 174: 671-674.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2017.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2017.11.011

Thomas LH, Coupe J, Cross LD, Tan AL, Watkins CL. Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2: CD004462.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004462.pub4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004462.pub4

Additional Files



How to Cite

Amatya, B., Elmalik, A. ., Lee, S. Y., Song, K., Galea, M. ., & Khan, F. (2022). A process evaluation of patient care needs using the Post-Stroke Checklist: A prospective study . Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 54, jrm00259. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349



Original Report