Unmet rehabilitation needs in the first 6 months post-injury in a trauma centre population with moderate-to-severe traumatic injuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40078Keywords:
assessment of healthcare needs, community health services, rehabilitation, multiple trauma, traumatic injury, trauma centreAbstract
Objective: To describe the needs for subacute inpatient rehabilitation and community-based healthcare services, rehabilitation, and social support in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic injury in the first 6 months post-injury. Further, to explore associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and unmet needs.
Design: Multicentre prospective cohort study.
Subjects: Of 601 persons (75% males), mean (standard deviation) age 47 (21) years, admitted to trauma centres in 2020 with moderate-to-severe injury, 501 patients responded at the 6-month follow-up and thus were included in the analyses.
Methods: Sociodemographic and injury-related characteristics were recorded at inclusion. Estimation of needs was assessed with the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale Extended–Trauma and the Needs and Provision Complexity Scale on hospital discharge. Provision of services was recorded 6 months post-injury. Multivariable logistic regressions explored associations between baseline variables and unmet inpatient rehabilitation and community-based service needs.
Results: In total, 20% exhibited unmet needs for subacute inpatient rehabilitation, compared with 60% for community-based services. Predictors for unmet community-based service needs included residing in less central areas, profound injury severity, severe head injury, and rehabilitation referral before returning home.
Conclusion: Inadequate provision of healthcare and rehabilitation services, particularly in the municipalities, resulted in substantial unmet needs in the first 6 months following injury.
Downloads
References
National Trauma Registry (NTR). [cited 2021 Feb 4]. Available from: https://nkt-traume.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/aarsrapport-NTR-2016_2.pdf
Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A. Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Trauma 2007; 62: 461–470.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000222916.30253.ea DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000222916.30253.ea
Gabbe BJ, Simpson PM, Harrison JE, Lyons RA, Ameratunga S, Ponsford J, et al. Return to work and functional outcomes after major trauma: who recovers, when, and how well? An Surg 2016; 263: 623–632.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001564
MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 366–378.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa052049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa052049
van Breugel JMM, Niemeyer MJS, Houwert RM, Groenwold RHH, Leenen LPH, van Wessem KJP. Global changes in mortality rates in polytrauma patients admitted to the ICU: a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15: 55.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00330-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00330-3
Giummarra MJ, Simpson P, Gabbe BJ. Pain, anxiety, and depression in the first two years following transport-related major trauma: a population-based, prospective registry cohort study. Pain Med 2020; 21: 291–307.
https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz209
Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Finset A, Roise O, Andelic N. Physical and mental health 10 years after multiple trauma: a prospective cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 78: 628–633.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000541
Uleberg O, Pape K, Kristiansen T, Romundstad PR, Klepstad P. Population-based analysis of the impact of trauma on longer-term functional outcomes. Br J Surg 2019; 106: 65–73.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10965
Bouman AI, Hemmen B, Evers SM, van de Meent H, Ambergen T, Vos PE, et al. Effects of an integrated ‘fast track’ rehabilitation service for multi-trauma patients: a non-randomized clinical trial in the Netherlands. PloS One 2017; 12: e0170047.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170047
Khan F, Amatya B, Hoffman K. Systematic review of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with multiple trauma. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 88–96.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7776
Kamenov K, Mills JA, Chatterji S, Cieza A. Needs and unmet needs for rehabilitation services: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 1227–1237.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1422036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1422036
Shiner CT, Vratsistas-Curto A, Bramah V, McDonell K, Mahoney AEJ, Sweeney S, et al. Assessing unmet rehabilitation needs and the feasibility of a telehealth rehabilitation consultation service for road trauma survivors recently discharged from hospital. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 3795–3804.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1887377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1887377
Andelic N, Røe C, Tenovuo O, Azouvi P, Dawes H, Majdan M, et al. Unmet rehabilitation needs after traumatic brain injury across Europe: results from the CENTER-TBI study. J Clin Med 2021; 10.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051035
Graham SK, Cameron ID. A survey of rehabilitation services in Australia. Australian health review: a publication of the Australian Hospital Association 2008; 32: 392–399.
https://doi.org/10.1071/ah080392å DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AH080392
Sirois MJ, Dionne CE, Lavoie A. Regional differences in rehabilitation needs, rehabilitation access, and physical outcomes among multiple trauma survivors. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 387–398.
https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0b013e31819c592f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31819c592f
Polinder S, van Beeck EF, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, Looman CW, Mulder S, et al. Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma 2007; 62: 133–141.
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31802b71c9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31802b71c9
Andelic N, Soberg HL, Berntsen S, Sigurdardottir S, Roe C. Self-perceived health care needs and delivery of health care services 5 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. PM R 2014; 6: 1013–1021; quiz 1021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.005
Soberg HL, Moksnes H, Anke A, Røise O, Røe C, Aas E, et al. Rehabilitation needs, service provision, and costs in the first year following traumatic injuries: protocol for a prospective cohort study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10: e25980.
https://doi.org/10.2196/25980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/25980
Moksnes H, Schäfer C, Rasmussen MS, Søberg HL, Røise O, Anke A, et al. Factors associated with discharge destination from acute care after moderate-to-severe traumatic injuries in Norway: a prospective population-based study. Inj Epidemiol 2023; 10: 20.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-023-00431-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-023-00431-y
Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2005; 2008 [accessed on 18 October 2022]. Available from: https://www.aaam.org/abbreviated-injury-scale-ais/
American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System [cited 2022 October 10]. Available from: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system.
Høydahl E. Classification of centrality 2020. Statistics Norway; 2020.
Turner-Stokes L, Scott H, Williams H, Siegert R. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale–extended version: detection of patients with highly complex needs. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 715–720.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.615880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.615880
Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care. PR FNFoNM. Rehabilitation Complexity Scale – Extended (RCS-E v13). [cited 2024 Feb 9]; Available from: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/cicelysaunders/resources/toolkits/rehabilitation-complexity-scale.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Turner-Stokes L, McCrone P, Jackson DM, Siegert RJ. The Needs and Provision Complexity Scale: a multicentre prospective cohort analysis of met and unmet needs and their cost implications for patients with complex neurological disability. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002353.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002353
NCASRI Project team LT-SL. Final report of the National Clinical Audit of Specialist Rehabilitation following major injury. London: NCASRI; 2019.
Jacob L, Cogné M, Tenovuo O, Røe C, Andelic N, Majdan M, et al. Predictors of access to rehabilitation in the year following traumatic brain injury: a European prospective and multicenter study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 34: 814–830.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320946038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320946038
Siegert RJ, Jackson DM, Playford ED, Fleminger S, Turner-Stokes L. A longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study of community rehabilitation service delivery in long-term neurological conditions. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004231.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004231
van Walsem MR, Howe EI, Iversen K, Frich JC, Andelic N. Unmet needs for healthcare and social support services in patients with Huntington’s disease: a cross-sectional population-based study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015; 10: 124.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0324-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0324-8
Forslund MV, Borgen IMH, Karic T, Kleffelgård I, Hauger SL, Løvstad M, et al. Validity of the Norwegian Version of the Needs and Provision Complexity Scale (NPCS) in patients with traumatic brain injury and atraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin MEd 2024; 13: 752.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030752
Foster M, Allen S, Fleming J. Unmet health and rehabilitation needs of people with long-term neurological conditions in Queensland, Australia. Health Soc Care Community 2015; 23: 292–303.
https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12146
Mitsch V, Curtin M, Badge H. The provision of brain injury rehabilitation services for people living in rural and remote New South Wales, Australia. Brain Injury 2014; 28: 1504–1513.
https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.938120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.938120
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. State of Health in the EU Norway Country Health Profile 2021. 2021; Brussels: OECD and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, in cooperation with the European Commission; 2021.
Noreau L, Noonan VK, Cobb J, Leblond J, Dumont FS. Spinal cord injury community survey: a national, comprehensive study to portray the lives of Canadians with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2014; 20: 249–264.
https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2004-249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2004-249
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Håkon Øgreid Moksnes, Nada Andelic, Christoph Schäfer, Audny Anke, Helene Lundgaard Soberg, Cecilie Røe, Emilie Isager Howe, Marit V. Forslund, Olav Røise, Hilde Margrete Dahl, Frank Becker, Marianne Løvstad, Paul B. Perrin, Juan Lu, Unni Sveen, Torgeir Hellstrøm, Mari S. Rasmussen
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
Funding data
-
Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Grant numbers 2019043