Paired associative stimulation improves motor function in the upper extremity in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a corroborative study

Authors

  • Carl Wahlgren Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
  • Richard Levi Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
  • Magnus Thordstein Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Neurobiology, Linköping University, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.41021

Keywords:

electric stimulation therapy, rehabilitation, spinal cord injuries, therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation

Abstract

Objective: To corroborate findings suggesting that spinally targeted paired associative stimulation improves upper extremity motor function in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Design: Prospective interventional study.

Subjects: Five adults with chronic tetraplegia.

Methods: Participants received paired associative stimulation, combining peripheral nerve stimulation and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation towards 1 arm (16 1-h sessions during 4 consecutive weeks, targeting the 3 large nerves). Manual muscle testing (MMT) was performed in 23 muscles in each arm, at 3 time points (pre-stimulation, t0; the week following the stimulation period, t1; and 4–5 weeks post-stimulation, t2). Additionally, grip strength and changes in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure were assessed.

Results: The mean improvement in manual muscle testing scores in the targeted extremity was +0.49 at t1 (p = 0.078) and +0.55 at t2 (p = 0.062). Grip strength in the stimulated extremity increased by 3.2 kg at t1 and 3.4 kg at t2, and in the non-targeted extremity by 2.2 and 3.6 kg, respectively. Performance and satisfaction increased by 2.1/2.4 points at t1, and by 2.0/1.9 points at t2.

Conclusion: Paired associative stimulation improved motor function: at the group level, MMT of the stimulated hand (p = 0.06) and non-stimulated hand (p = 0.04). Most participants achieved clinically relevant improvement. Thus, the results corroborate prior studies. The method may complement conventional rehabilitation for improving upper extremity function in incomplete tetraplegia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3: 17018.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.18

Kumar R, Lim J, Mekary RA, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Sharif SY, et al. Traumatic spinal injury: global epide-miology and worldwide volume. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: e345–363.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033

New PW, Cripps RA, Bonne Lee B. Global maps of non-traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: to-wards a living data repository. Spinal Cord 2014; 52: 97–109.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.165.

Tator CH. Update on the pathophysiology and pathology of acute spinal cord injury. Brain Pathol 1995; 5: 407–413.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00619.x

Donovan WH, Carter RE, Bedbrook GM, Young JS, -Griffiths ER. Incidence of medical complications in -spinal cord -injury: patients in specialised, compared with non--specialised centres. Paraplegia 1984; 22: 282–290.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1984.46

Kjell J, Olson L. Rat models of spinal cord injury: from pathology to potential therapies. Dis Model Mech 2016; 9: 1125–1137.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.025833

Zhang Y, Al Mamun A, Yuan Y, Lu Q, Xiong J, Yang S, et al. Acute spinal cord injury: pathophysiology and pharmacological intervention (Review). Mol Med Rep 2021; 23: 417.

https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.12056

Chen S, Levi AD. Restorative treatments for spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2017; 28: 63–71.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2016.08.004

Rodriguez-Jimenez FJ, Jendelova P, Erceg S. The activation of dormant ependymal cells following spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res Ther 2023; 14: 175.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03395-4

Cunningham CJ, Viskontas M, Janowicz K, Sani Y, -Håkansson ME, Heidari A, et al. The potential of gene therapies for spinal cord injury repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies. Neural Regen Res 2023; 18: 299–305.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.347941

Hejrati N, Fehlings MG. A review of emerging neuroprotective and neuroregenerative therapies in trau-matic spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2021; 60: 331–340.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2021.08.009

Kusiak AN, Selzer ME. Neuroplasticity in the spinal cord. Handb Clin Neurol 2013; 110: 23–42.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00003-4

Fuchs E, Flügge G. Adult neuroplasticity: more than 40 years of research. Neural Plast 2014; 2014: 541870–541870.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/541870

Minassian K, McKay WB, Binder H, Hofstoetter US. Targeting lumbar spinal neural circuitry by epidural stimulation to restore motor function after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics 2016; 13: 284–294.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-016-0421-y

Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, et al. Non-invasive electrical and mag-netic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and proce-dures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126: 1071–1107.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001

Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and re-lated non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 1031–1048.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012

Knotkova H, Hamani C, Sivanesan E, Le Beuffe MFE, Moon JY, Cohen SP, et al. Neuromodulation for chronic pain. Lancet 2021; 397: 2111–2124.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00794-7

Haastert-Talini K, Grothe C. Electrical stimulation for promoting peripheral nerve regeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol 2013; 109: 111–124.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420045-6.00005-5

Lefaucheur J-P, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, -Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the -therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131: 474–528.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002

Jannati A, Oberman LM, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A. Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2023; 48: 191–208.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01453-

Nardone R, Höller Y, Brigo F, Orioli A, Tezzon F, Schwenker K, et al. Descending motor pathways and cor-tical physiology after spinal cord injury assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review. Brain Res 2015; 1619: 139–154.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.036

Provencher J, Schneider C. Paired corticomotoneuronal stimulation of the preactivated ankle dorsi-flexor: an open-label study of magnetic and electrical painless protocols. Exp Brain Res 2023; 241: 629–647.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06534-0

Shulga A, Zubareva A, Lioumis P, Mäkelä JP. Paired associative stimulation with high-frequency periph-eral component leads to enhancement of corticospinal transmission at wide range of interstimulus intervals. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10: 470–470.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00470

Tolmacheva A, Savolainen S, Kirveskari E, Brandstack N, Mäkelä JP, Shulga A. Paired associative stimu-lation improves hand function after non-traumatic spinal cord injury: a case series. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2019; 4: 178–183.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.07.002

Shulga A, Lioumis P, Kirveskari E, Savolainen S, Mäkelä JP. A novel paired associative stimulation proto-col with a high-frequency peripheral component: a review on results in spinal cord injury rehabilita-tion. Eur J Neurosci 2021; 53: 3242–3257.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15191

Jo HJ, Richardson MSA, Oudega M, Perez MA. Paired corticospinal–motoneuronal stimulation and ex-ercise after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44: S23–27.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.1970908

Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 1997; 275: 213–215.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5297.213

Tolmacheva A, Savolainen S, Kirveskari E, Lioumis P, Kuusela L, Brandstack N, et al. Long-term paired associative stimulation enhances motor output of the tetraplegic hand. J Neurotrauma 2017; 34: 2668–2674.

https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.4996

Brown M, Hislop H, Avers D. Daniels and Worthingham’s muscle testing – e-Book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.

Svinøy O-E, Hilde G, Bergland A, Strand BH. Reference values for Jamar+ digital dynamometer hand grip strength in healthy adults and in adults with non-communicable diseases or osteoarthritis: the Nor-wegian Tromsø study 2015–2016. Eur J Ageing 2023; 20: 44.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-023-00791-w

Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational perfor-mance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990; 57: 82–87.

https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749005700207

Bai Y-W, Yang Q-H, Chen P-J, Wang X-Q. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation regulates neuro-inflammation in neuropathic pain. Front Immunol 2023; 14: 1172293.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1172293

Fernandes AM, Graven-Nielsen T, de Andrade DC. New updates on transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic pain. Curr Opin Support Palliati Care 2022; 16: 65.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000591

Attal N, Poindessous-Jazat F, De Chauvigny E, Quesada C, Mhalla A, Ayache SS, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain: a randomized multicentre sham-controlled trial. Brain 2021; 144: 3328–3339.

https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab208

Shulga A, Lioumis P, Kirveskari E, Savolainen S, Mäkelä JP, Ylinen A. The use of F-response in defining interstimulus intervals appropriate for LTP-like plasticity induction in lower limb spinal paired associa-tive stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2015; 242: 112–117.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.012

Gerasimenko Y, Gorodnichev R, Moshonkina T, Sayenko D, Gad P, Reggie Edgerton V. Transcutaneous electrical spinal-cord stimulation in humans. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 58: 225–231.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.003

Ding Y, Kastin AJ, Pan W. Neural plasticity after spinal cord injury. Curr Pharm Des 2005; 11: 1441–1450.

Lu T, Pan Y, Kao S-Y, Li C, Kohane I, Chan J, et al. Gene regulation and DNA damage in the ageing human brain. Nature 2004; 429: 883–891.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02661

Ghasemian-Shirvan E, Farnad L, Mosayebi-Samani M, Verstraelen S, Meesen RLJ, Kuo M-F, et al. Age-related differences of motor cortex plasticity in adults: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Brain Stimulation 2020; 13: 1588–1599.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.004

Pauwels L, Chalavi S, Swinnen SP. Aging and brain plasticity. Aging (Albany NY) 2018; 10: 1789–1790.

https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101514

Benedetti B, Weidenhammer A, Reisinger M, Couillard-Despres S. Spinal cord injury and loss of cortical inhibition. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 5622.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105622

Mazzone GL, Mohammadshirazi A, Aquino JB, Nistri A, Taccola G. GABAergic mechanisms can redress the tilted balance between excitation and inhibition in damaged spinal networks. Mol Neurobiol 2021; 58: 3769–3786.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-021-02370-5

Koltzenburg M, Wall PD, McMahon SB. Does the right side know what the left is doing? Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 122–127.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01302-2

Boddington LJ, Reynolds JNJ. Targeting interhemispheric inhibition with neuromodulation to enhance stroke rehabilitation. Brain Stimul 2017; 10: 214–222.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.006

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-13

How to Cite

Wahlgren, C., Levi, R., & Thordstein, M. (2024). Paired associative stimulation improves motor function in the upper extremity in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a corroborative study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 56, jrm41021. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.41021

Issue

Section

Original Report

Categories