Feasibility and safety of automated multi-channel FES-assisted gait training in incomplete spinal cord injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42638Keywords:
Functional electrical stimulation, Gait-rehabilitation, Incomplete, Spinal cord injury, WalkingAbstract
Objective: The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of automated multi-channel functional electrical stimulation-assisted gait training was assessed in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury, using an electrical stimulation suit with built-in surface electrodes and motion capture sensors (Teslasuit).
Design: 10-week functional electrical stimulation-assisted gait training, twice weekly for 30 min.
Subjects/Patients: Five individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (≥ 12 months post-injury, ASIA C/D, minimal Walking Index Spinal Cord Injury II ≥ 9).
Methods: The quadriceps, gluteii, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius muscles were stimulated bilaterally during gait. Feasibility and safety were evaluated via questionnaires, session adherence, and adverse events. Gait function was assessed using a 10 m walk test, Walking Index Spinal Cord Injury II, and Hoffer classification at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up. Surface electromyography and spatiotemporal parameters (walking speed, step length and width, cadence) were recorded during the 10 m walk test.
Results: All participants completed the training (91% adherence) with no serious adverse events. Temporary skin redness, muscle soreness, and fatigue were reported by participants. Post-intervention, 4 participants increased their walking speed, step length, and cadence, with 2 maintaining and 2 further improving at follow-up. No consistent changes were found in muscle activity post training.
Conclusion: Automated multi-channel functional electrical stimulation-assisted gait training was feasible, safe, and well received. Preliminary findings suggest that gait improved in most participants, though individual responses varied. The results highlight the potential of multi-channel functional electrical stimulation-assisted gait training as a valuable tool for enhancing gait recovery.
Downloads
References
Drolet M, Noreau L, Vachon J, Moffet H. Muscle strength changes as measured by dynamometry following functional rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 791–800.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90229-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90229-0
Thomas CK, Zaidner EY, Calancie B, Broton JG, Bigland-Ritchie BR. Muscle weakness, paralysis, and atrophy after human cervical spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 1997; 148: 414–423.
https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1997.6690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1997.6690
Calancie B, Broton JG, John Klose K, Traad M, Difini J, Ram Ayyar D. Evidence that alterations in presynaptic inhibition contribute to segmental hypo- and hyperexcitability after spinal cord injury in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 89: 177–186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(93)90131-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(93)90131-8
Crozier KS, Cheng LL, Graziani V, Zorn G, Herbison G, Ditunno JF. Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery. Spinal Cord 1992; 30: 762–767.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1992.147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1992.147
Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 1371–1383.
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371
Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JTC, Wolfe DL; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research Team. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29: 1548–1555.
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2226
Ditunno P, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno J. Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 500–506.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102172
Sherwood AM, Dimitrijevic MR, Barry McKay W. Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI. J Neurol Sci 1992; 110: 90–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(92)90014-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(92)90014-C
Gerasimenko Y, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Epidural stimulation: comparison of the spinal circuits that generate and control locomotion in rats, cats and humans. Exp Neurol 2008; 209: 417–425.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.07.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.07.015
Grillner S. Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion. Neuron 2006; 52: 751–766.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.008
Harkema S, Dobkin B, Edgerton VR. Pattern generators in locomotion: implications for recovery of walking after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2000; 6: 82–96.
https://doi.org/10.1310/E3W4-PCN9-V5FY-900A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/E3W4-PCN9-V5FY-900A
Guertin PA. Central pattern generator for locomotion: anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological considerations. Front Neur 2013; 3: 183.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00183
Eisdorfer JT, Smit RD, Keefe KM, Lemay MA, Smith GM, Spence AJ. Epidural electrical stimulation: a review of plasticity mechanisms that are hypothesized to underlie enhanced recovery from spinal cord injury with stimulation. Front Mol Neurosci 2020; 13: 163.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.00163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.00163
Bersch I, Tesini S, Bersch U, Frotzler A. Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury: clinical evidence versus daily practice. Artificial Organs 2015; 39: 849–854.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12618
Granat MH, Ferguson ACB, Andrews BJ, Delargy M. The role of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury: observed benefits during gait studies. Spinal Cord 1993; 31: 207–215.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.39
Hesse S, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Electromechanical gait training with functional electrical stimulation: case studies in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 346–352.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101595
Kapadia N, Masani K, Catharine Craven B, Giangregorio LM, Hitzig SL, Richards K, et al. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on walking competency. J Spinal Cord Med 2014; 37: 511–524.
https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000263
Nightingale EJ, Raymond J, Middleton JW, Crosbie J, Davis GM. Benefits of FES gait in a spinal cord injured population. Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 646–657.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102101
Sharif H, Gammage K, Chun S, Ditor D. Effects of FES-ambulation training on locomotor function and health-related quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2014; 20: 58–69.
https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2001-58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2001-58
Thrasher TA, Flett HM, Popovic MR. Gait training regimen for incomplete spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 357–361.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101864
Street T, Singleton C. A clinically meaningful training effect in walking speed using functional electrical stimulation for motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2018; 41: 361–366.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2017.1392106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2017.1392106
Maležič M, Hesse S. Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic patients: a modified programme of treatment. Spinal Cord 1995; 33: 126–131.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.28
Laufer Y, Dickstein R, Chefez Y, Marcovitz E. The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: a randomized study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 69–78.
Field-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 48–60.
https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090359
Braz GP, Russold MF, Fornusek C, Hamzaid NA, Smith RM, Davis GM. A novel motion sensor-driven control system for FES-assisted walking after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Med Eng Phys 2016; 38: 1223-1231.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.007
Nooijen CF, Ter Hoeve N, Field-Fote EC. Gait quality is improved by locomotor training in individuals with SCI regardless of training approach. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 2009; 6: 36.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-36
Kobetic R, Triolo RJ, Marsolais EB. Muscle selection and walking performance of multichannel FES systems for ambulation in paraplegia. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 1997; 5: 23–29.
https://doi.org/10.1109/86.559346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.559346
Müller P, Del Ama AJ, Moreno JC, Schauer T. Adaptive multichannel FES neuroprosthesis with learning control and automatic gait assessment. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 2020; 17: 36.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-0640-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-0640-7
Zero AM, Paris MT, Rice CL. Differential effects of stimulation frequency on isometric and concentric isotonic contractile function in human quadriceps. J Appl Physiol 2024; 137: 111–124.
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00075.2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00075.2024
Lyu C, Panteli G, Bollheimer LC, Leonhardt S, Von Platen P. Evaluation of FES-induced muscle fatigue and recovery using torque and surface electromyography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2024; 2024: 1–4.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782626
Ackermann PW, Juthberg R, Flodin J. Unlocking the potential of neuromuscular electrical stimulation: achieving physical activity benefits for all abilities. Front Sports Act Living 2024; 6: 1507402.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1507402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1507402
Geerse DJ, Coolen BH, Roerdink M. Kinematic validation of a multi-kinect v2 instrumented 10-meter walkway for quantitative gait assessments. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0139913.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139913
Salbach NM, O’Brien KK, Brooks D, Irvin E, Martino R, Takhar P, et al. Reference values for standardized tests of walking speed and distance: a systematic review. Gait Posture 2015; 41: 341–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.10.002
Zeni JA, Richards JG, Higginson JS. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture 2008; 27: 710–714.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007
Hermens HJ, Roessingh Research and Development BV, editors. European recommendations for surface ElectroMyoGraphy: results of the SENIAM project. Enschede: SENIAM; 1999, 122 p.
Boonstra TW, Breakspear M. Neural mechanisms of intermuscular coherence: implications for the rectification of surface electromyography. J Neurophysiol 2012; 107: 796–807.
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00066.2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00066.2011
Gagnon DH, Escalona MJ, Vermette M, Carvalho LP, Karelis AD, Duclos C, et al. Locomotor training using an overground robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with a chronic spinal cord injury living in the community: lessons learned from a feasibility study in terms of recruitment, attendance, learnability, performance and safety. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 2018; 15: 12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0354-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0354-2
Alajam RA, Alqahtanti AS, Frederick J, Liu W. The feasibility of an 8-week walking training program using a novel assistive gait training device in individuals with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2022; 17: 658–667.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1805801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1805801
Hubli M, Dietz V, Bolliger M. Spinal reflex activity: a marker for neuronal functionality after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 188–196.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311420844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311420844
Van Hedel HJA, Wirth B, Dietz V. Limits of locomotor ability in subjects with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 593–603.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101768
Wirz M, Zemon DH, Rupp R, Scheel A, Colombo G, Dietz V, et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 672–680.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004
Edgerton VR, Tillakaratne NJK, Bigbee AJ, De Leon RD, Roy RR. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004; 27: 145–167.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144308
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Simone Berkelmans, Nadia Dominici, Maarten Afschrift, Sjoerd Bruijn, Thomas W.J. Janssen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
