Muscle strength and stiffness of elbow muscles: correlation with upper limb motor functions in people with chronic stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.44075Keywords:
stroke, upper limb, assessment toolAbstract
Objective: To (i) quantify elbow flexor and extensor strength and stiffness in people with stroke; (ii) compare affected and unaffected sides; (iii) compare stroke survivors and healthy older adults; and (iv) examine correlations between muscle properties, motor control, and ADLs.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Participants: 65 stroke survivors and 31 healthy older adults.
Methods: Elbow muscle strength and stiffness (biceps and triceps) were assessed bilaterally by Myoton PRO. Stroke participants also completed the Fugl-Meyer Assessment–Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Oxford Participation and Activity Questionnaire (OxPAQ).
Results: Stroke participants had significantly weaker elbow muscles on the affected side (p < 0.001) than the unaffected side, but stiffness did not differ significantly. Compared with healthy adults, stroke participants showed reduced strength but similar stiffness. Weak to moderate correlations were found between muscle strength and FMA-UE, ARAT, and DASH (ρ = 0.336–0.613), but not with OxPAQ. Weak negative correlations were found between biceps stiffness and motor function (FMA, ARAT) (ρ = –0.343 to –0.397), and a weak negative correlation between triceps stiffness and OxPAQ emotional well-being (ρ = –0.313).
Conclusion: Stroke survivors have reduced elbow strength but similar stiffness compared with the healthy elderly. Strength correlates moderately with upper limb function; stiffness shows inconsistent associations.
Downloads
References
Collaborators GLRoS. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2429–2437.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804492
Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N, et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394: 51–62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4
Brainin M, Norrving B, Sunnerhagen KS, Goldstein LB, Cramer SC, Donnan GA, et al. Poststroke chronic disease management: towards improved identification and interventions for poststroke spasticity-related complications. Int J Stroke 2011; 6: 42–46.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00539.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00539.x
Dutta D, Sen S, Aruchamy S, Mandal S. Prevalence of post-stroke upper extremity paresis in developing countries and significance of m-Health for rehabilitation after stroke: a review. Smart Health 2022; 23: 100264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100264
Hunnicutt JL, Gregory CM. Skeletal muscle changes following stroke: a systematic review and comparison to healthy individuals. Top Stroke Rehabil 2017; 24: 463–471.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1292720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1292720
Gray V, Rice CL, Garland SJ. Factors that influence muscle weakness following stroke and their clinical implications: a critical review. Physiother Can 2012; 64: 415–426.
https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2011-03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2011-03
Scherbakov N, Von Haehling S, Anker SD, Dirnagl U, Doehner W. Stroke induced sarcopenia: muscle wasting and disability after stroke. Int J Cardiol 2013; 170: 89–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.031
Kuo C-L, Hu G-C. Post-stroke spasticity: a review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatments. Int J Gerontol 2018; 12: 280–284.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2018.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2018.05.005
Järvinen TA, Józsa L, Kannus P, Järvinen TL, Järvinen M. Organization and distribution of intramuscular connective tissue in normal and immobilized skeletal muscles. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 2002; 23: 245–254.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020904518336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020904518336
Ryan AS, Buscemi A, Forrester L, Hafer-Macko CE, Ivey FM. Atrophy and intramuscular fat in specific muscles of the thigh: associated weakness and hyperinsulinemia in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 865–872.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311408920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311408920
Miller T, Ying MT, Chung RC, Pang MY. Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of multimodal ultrasonography and related clinical measures in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 103: 459–472. e454.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.09.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.09.015
De Deyne PG, Hafer-Macko CE, Ivey FM, Ryan AS, Macko RF. Muscle molecular phenotype after stroke is associated with gait speed. Muscle Nerve 2004; 30: 209–215.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20085
Konieczny M, Pakosz P, Domaszewski P, Błaszczyszyn M, Kawala-Sterniuk A. Analysis of upper limbs target-reaching movement and muscle co-activation in patients with first time stroke for rehabilitation progress monitoring. Appli Sci 2022; 12: 1551.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031551
Ada L, Canning CG, Low SL. Stroke patients have selective muscle weakness in shortened range. Brain 2003; 126: 724–731.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg066
Chuang L-l, Wu C-y, Lin K-c. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of myotonometric measurement of muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 532–540.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.014
Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua Y-H, Williams GP, et al. Assessment of lower limb muscle strength and power using hand-held and fixed dynamometry: a reliability and validity study. PloS One 2015; 10: e0140822.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140822
Nguyen AP, Detrembleur C, Fisette P, Selves C, Mahaudens P. MyotonPro is a valid device for assessing wrist biomechanical stiffness in healthy young adults. Front Sports Act Living 2022; 4: 797975.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.797975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.797975
Aird L, Samuel D, Stokes M. Quadriceps muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness in older males: reliability and symmetry using the MyotonPRO. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2012; 55: e31–e39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.005
Lettner J, Królikowska A, Ramadanov N, Oleksy Ł, Hakam HT, Becker R, et al. Evaluating the reliability of MyotonPro in assessing muscle properties: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. Medicina 2024; 60: 851.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060851
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13–31.
https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197771331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197771331
Boz Sönmez D, Giray E, Atıcı A, Illeez ÖG, Akpınar P, Ünlü Özkan F, et al. Validity and reliability of selective control of upper extremity scale (SCUES) in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46: 4813–4824.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2291551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2291551
See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 732–741.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313491000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313491000
Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 483–492.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
Fernández-Solana J, Pardo-Hernández R, González-Bernal JJ, Sánchez-González E, González-Santos J, Soto-Cámara R, et al. Psychometric properties of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scale in post-stroke patients: Spanish population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 14918.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214918
Dixon D, Johnston M, McQueen M, Court-Brown C. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-114
Dalton E, Lannin NA, Laver K, Ross L, Ashford S, McCluskey A, et al. Validity, reliability and ease of use of the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in adults following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39: 2504–2511.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1229364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1229364
Morley D, Dummett S, Kelly L, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C. Validation of the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2016: 73–80.
https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S96822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S96822
Oxford participation and activities questionnaire in people with stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 15450.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315450
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences: Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2003.
Nguyen H, Phan T, Shadmehr R, Lee SW. Impact of unilateral and bilateral impairments on bimanual force production following stroke. J Neurophysiol 2023; 130: 60–618.
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00125.2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00125.2023
Kamper DG, Fischer HC, Cruz EG, Rymer WZ. Weakness is the primary contributor to finger impairment in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1262–1269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.013
Johnson M, Paranjape R, Strachota E, Tchekanov G, McGuire J. Quantifying learned non-use after stroke using unilateral and bilateral steering tasks. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011: 2011:5975457.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975457
Ditroilo M, Forte R, Benelli P, Gambarara D, De Vito G. Effects of age and limb dominance on upper and lower limb muscle function in healthy males and females aged 40–80 years. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 667–677.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640411003642098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640411003642098
Tieland M, Trouwborst I, Clark BC. Skeletal muscle performance and ageing. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018; 9: 3–19.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12238
Pandian S, Arya KN. Motor impairment of the ipsilesional body side in poststroke subjects. J Bodywork Movement Ther 2013; 17: 495–503.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.03.008
Lacroix S, Havton LA, McKay H, Yang H, Brant A, Roberts J, et al. Bilateral corticospinal projections arise from each motor cortex in the macaque monkey: a quantitative study. J Comp Neurol 2004; 473: 147–161.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20051
Vega-González A, Granat MH. Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 541–548.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.049
Lee SS, Jakubowski KL, Spear SC, Rymer WZ. Muscle material properties in passive and active stroke-impaired muscle. J Biomech 2019; 83: 197–204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.043
Willoughby DS, Priest JW, Jennings RA. Myosin heavy chain isoform and ubiquitin protease mRNA expression after passive leg cycling in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 157–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.0810157
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90134-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90134-5
Olsson MC, Krüger M, Meyer LH, Ahnlund L, Gransberg L, Linke WA, et al. Fibre type-specific increase in passive muscle tension in spinal cord-injured subjects with spasticity. J Physiology 2006; 577: 339–352.
https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116749
Tabary J, Tabary C, Tardieu C, Tardieu G, Goldspink G. Physiological and structural changes in the cat’s soleus muscle due to immobilization at different lengths by plaster casts. J Physiology 1972; 224: 231–244.
https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009891
Fröhlich-Zwahlen A, Casartelli N, Item-Glatthorn J, Maffiuletti N. Validity of resting myotonometric assessment of lower extremity muscles in chronic stroke patients with limited hypertonia: a preliminary study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2014; 24: 762–769.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.06.007
Norlander A, Iwarsson S, Jönsson A-C, Lindgren A, Månsson Lexell E. Participation in social and leisure activities while re-constructing the self: understanding strategies used by stroke survivors from a long-term perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 4284–4292.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1900418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1900418
Miller AEJ, MacDougall J, Tarnopolsky M, Sale D. Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1993; 66: 254–262.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235103
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shamay S.M. Ng, Peiming Chen, Shun Hei Choi, Tung Ji Lam, Hei Yee Lau, Hing Ki Lau, Ho Yeung Law, Desmond Y.W. Lam, Cynthia Y.Y. Lai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.