Psychometric Assessment of the Swedish version of the Work Ability Index in Patients with Chronic Pain in Specialized Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.7146Keywords:
chronic pain, construct validity, internal consistency, psychometrics, work abilityAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the Work Ability Index (WAI) in patients with chronic pain in secondary and tertiary care.
Methods: Cross-sectional study based on 200 patients with chronic pain (> 3 months), with a final sample of 118 participants, 18–64-years-old. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis for the structural validity of the WAI, and by correlating the WAI with EuroQol EQ-5D, Brief Pain Inventory pain severity and interference, Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scales. The study also assessed the discriminant validity of the WAI for occupational status, and the validity of the single-item work ability score. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency.
Results: A single-factor model of WAI was supported. Internal consistency was good. Moderate correlations were found, except for Brief Pain Inventory pain severity, where the correlation was weak; hence, both convergent and divergent validity of the WAI were supported. The work ability score correlated strongly with the total WAI, and the discriminant validity for both was good.
Conclusion: In patients with chronic pain in specialized care, the WAI and the work ability score displayed acceptable construct validity and internal consistency, supporting their use in a clinical context and research.
Downloads
References
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006; 10: 287-287.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009
OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers: a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD; 2010 [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/sickness-disability-and-work-breaking-the-barriers_9789264088856-en.
Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S, editors. Dimensions of Work Ability. Results of the Health 2000 Survey. Helsinki; 2008 [cited 2022 May 10]. Available from: https://sivusto.kykyviisari.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Gould-Dimensions-of-work-ability.pdf
Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Seitsamo J. New dimensions of work ability. Int Congr Ser 2005; 1280: 3-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.060
van den Berg TIJ, Elders LAM, de Zwart BCH, Burdorf A. The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2008; 66: 211-220.
https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.039883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.039883
Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola M, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd revised edn. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2006.
Radkiewicz P, Widerszal-Bazyl M. Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study. Assess Promot Work Abil Health Well-Ageing Work 2005; 1280: 304-309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.089
de Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, van Duivenbooden JC. Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med Lond 2002; 52: 177-181.
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.4.177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.4.177
Bascour-Sandoval C, Soto-Rodríguez F, Muñoz-Poblete C, Marzuca-Nassr GN. Psychometric properties of the Spanish Version of the Work Ability Index in working individuals. J Occup Rehabil 2020; 30: 288-297.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09871-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09871-0
Alexopoulos E. Work Ability Index: validation of the Greek version and descriptive data in heavy industry employees. Br J Med Med Res 2013; 3: 608-621.
https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2013/2552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2013/2552
Abdolalizadeh M, Arastoo AA, Ghsemzadeh R, Montazeri A, Ahmadi K, Azizi A. The psychometric properties of an Iranian translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2012; 22: 401-408.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9355-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9355-3
Lundin A, Leijon O, Vaez M, Hallgren M, Torgén M. Predictive validity of the Work Ability Index and its individual items in the general population. Scand J Public Health 2017; 45: 350-356.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759
Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The Work Ability Index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health - a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010; 36: 404-412.
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2917
Alavinia SM, de Boer AGEM, van Duivenbooden JC, Frings-Dresen MHW, Burdorf A. Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability. Occup Med 2009; 59: 32-37.
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn148
Mateo Rodríguez I, Knox ECL, Oliver Hernández C, Daponte Codina A, the esTAR Group. psychometric properties of the Work Ability Index in Health Centre workers in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 12988.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412988
Martus P, Jakob O, Rose U, Seibt R, Freude G. A comparative analysis of the Work Ability Index. Occup Med 2010; 60: 517-524.
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq093
Tunks ER, Crook J, Weir R. Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry 2008; 53: 224-234.
https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370805300403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370805300403
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737-745.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Ljungvall H, Lind AL, Zetterberg H, Wagner S, Ekselius L, Karlsten R, et al. U-PAIN cohort study among patients with chronic pain in specialised pain care: a feasibility study. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e062265.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062265
Mokkink L, Prinsen C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN Study Design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019 [cited 2021 Dec 6]. Available from: https: //www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf#
Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain 2019; 160: 19-27.
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384
Garratt AM, Furunes H, Hellum C, Solberg T, Brox JI, Storheim K, et al. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19: 155.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y
van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health 2012; 15: 708-715.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap 1994; 23: 129-138.
Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004; 5: 133-137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606-613.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
Hansson M, Chotai J, Nordstöm A, Bodlund O. Comparison of two self-rating scales to detect depression: HADS and PHQ-9. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 59: e283-288.
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X454070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X454070
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1092.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Third edition. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 1999; 6: 1-55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Collier JE. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: basic to advanced techniques. New York London: Routledge; 2020.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011; 2: 53-55.
https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Field AP. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd edn. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2009.
Dancey CP, Reidy. Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow, England; 2007.
Carlson KD, Herdman AO. Understanding the Impact of convergent validity on research results. Organ Res Methods 2012; 15: 17-32.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383
Torgén M. Experiences of WAI in a random sample of the Swedish working population. Int Congr Ser 2005; 1280: 328-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.01.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.01.016
Bethge M, Gutenbrunner C, Neuderth S. Work Ability Index predicts application for disability pension after work-related medical rehabilitation for chronic back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 2262-2268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.003
Bethge M, Radoschewski F, Gutenbrunner C. The Work Ability Index as a screening tool to identify the need for rehabilitation: longitudinal findings from the Second German Sociomedical Panel of Employees. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 980-987.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1063
Tseli E, Vixner L, LoMartire R, Grooten W, Gerdle B, Äng B. Prognostic factors for improved physical and emotional functioning one year after interdisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic pain: results from a national quality registry in Sweden. J Rehabil Med 2020; 52: jrm00019.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2648
Pietilä-Holmner E, Enthoven P, Gerdle B, Molander P, Stålnacke B. Long-term outcomes of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care for patients with chronic pain. J Rehabil Med 2020; 52: jrm00023.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2649
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hedvig Zetterberg, Sofia Wagner , Lisa Ekselius, Rolf Karlsten , Ida Flink, Pernilla Åsenlöf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
