Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study

Authors

  • Khalaf Kridin Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology , University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, DE-23562 Lübeck, Germany
  • Christoph M. Hammers
  • Ralf J. Ludwig
  • Dana Tzur Bitan
  • Arnon D. Cohen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3831

Keywords:

metho­trexate, adjuvant drugs, drug survival, rituximab, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, dapsone, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin

Abstract

Drug survival reflects the real-life efficacy and safety of therapeutic agents. Evidence regarding the durability of adjuvant agents in the treatment of pemphigus is sparse. The aims of this study were to investigate the survival of adjuvant agents used to manage patients with pemphigus, and to identify predictors of treatment dropout. A retrospective population-based cohort study was designed to follow patients with pemphigus managed by adjuvant agents. The study population included 436 patients with pemphigus managed by 608 adjuvant agent courses. The highest median drug survival time was observed for rituximab (43.6 months, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.3–81.9), followed by cyclophosphamide (30.5 months; 95% CI 10.5–50.5), azathioprine (22.9 months; 95% CI 15.6–30.2), and mycophenolate mofetil (20.2 months; 95% CI 10.0–30.4). Compared with azathioprine, cyclosporine (adjusted hazard ratio 2.98; 95% CI 1.57–5.62; p = 0.005) and dapsone (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.07–3.15; p = 0.027) were associated with a significantly increased risk of drug discontinuation. To conclude, rituximab, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil demonstrated better durability, whilst dapsone and cyclosporine were associated with low drug survival and high dropout.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hertl M, Jedlickova H, Karpati S, Marinovic B, Uzun S, Yayli S, et al. Pemphigus. S2 guideline for diagnosis and treatment – guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29: 405–414.

Bystryn JC, Steinman NM. The adjuvant therapy of pemphigus. An update. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 203–212.

Schmidt E, Kasperkiewicz M, Joly P. Pemphigus. Lancet 2019; 394: 882–894.

Kridin K, Zelber-Sagi S, Bergman R. Pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: Differences in epidemiology and mortality. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97: 1095–1099.

Kridin K, Zelber-Sagi S, Bergman R. Mortality and cause of death in patients with pemphigus. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97: 607–611.

Kridin K. Emerging treatment options for the management of pemphigus vulgaris. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018; 14: 757–778.

Murrell DF, Peña S, Joly P, Marinovic B, Hashimoto T, Diaz LA, et al. Diagnosis and management of pemphigus: recommendations of an international panel of experts. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 82: 575–585.e1.

Harman KE, Brown D, Exton LS, Groves RW, Hampton PJ, Mohd Mustapa MF, et al. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of pemphigus vulgaris 2017. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177: 1170–1201.

Joly P, Maho-Vaillant M, Prost-Squarcioni C, Hebert V, Houivet E, Calbo S, et al. First-line rituximab combined with short-term prednisone versus prednisone alone for the treatment of pemphigus (Ritux 3): a prospective, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2017; 389: 2031–2040.

Shalom G, Cohen AD, Ziv M, Eran CB, Feldhamer I, Freud T, et al. Biologic drug survival in Israeli psoriasis patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76: 662–669.e1.

Lin PT, Wang SH, Chi CC. Drug survival of biologics in treating psoriasis: a meta-analysis of real-world evidence. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 16068.

Law Ping Man S, Bouzillé G, Beneton N, Safa G, Dupuy A, Droitcourt C. Drug survival and postdrug survival of first-line immunosuppressive treatments for atopic dermatitis: comparison between methotrexate and cyclosporine. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 2018; 32: 1327–1335.

Cohen AD, Dreiher J, Regev-Rosenberg S, Yakovson O, Lieberman N, Goldfracht M, et al. [The quality indigators program in Clalit Health Services: the first decade.] Harefuah 2010; 149: 204–209, 265 (in Hebrew).

Martin LK, Werth VP, Villaneuva E V, Murrell DF. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64: 903–908.

Chams-Davatchi C, Mortazavizadeh A, Daneshpazhooh M, Davatchi F, Balighi K, Esmaili N, et al. Randomized double blind trial of prednisolone and azathioprine, vs. prednisolone and placebo, in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 2013; 27: 1285–1292.

Beissert S, Werfel T, Frieling U, Böhm M, Sticherling M, Stadler R, et al. A comparison of oral methylprednisolone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 1447–1454.

Beissert S, Mimouni D, Kanwar AJ, Solomons N, Kalia V, Anhalt GJ. Treating pemphigus vulgaris with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130: 2041–2048.

Ioannides D, Apalla Z, Lazaridou E, Rigopoulos D. Evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil as a steroid-sparing agent in pemphigus: a randomized, prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26: 855–860.

Chams-Davatchi C, Esmaili N, Daneshpazhooh M, Valikhani M, Balighi K, Hallaji Z, et al. Randomized controlled open-label trial of four treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57: 622–628.

Atzmony L, Hodak E, Leshem YA, Rosenbaum O, Gdalevich M, Anhalt GJ, et al. The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73: 264–271.

Kridin K, Jones VA, Patel PM, Zelber-Sagi S, Hammers CM, Damiani G, et al. Patients with pemphigus are at an increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis: a large-scale cohort study. Immunol Res 2020; 68: 373–378.

Schmidt E, Sticherling M, Sárdy M, Eming R, Goebeler M, Hertl M, et al. S2k guidelines for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris/foliaceus and bullous pemphigoid: 2019 update. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 18: 516–526.

Piamphongsant T. Pemphigus controlled by dapsone. Br J Dermatol 1976; 94: 681–686.

Haim S, Friedman-Birnbaum R. Dapsone in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Dermatologica 1978; 156: 120–123.

Werth VP, Fivenson D, Pandya AG, Chen D, Rico MJ, Albrecht J, et al. Multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of dapsone as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent in maintenance-phase pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 25–32.

Ioannides D, Chrysomallis F, Bystryn JC. Ineffectiveness of cyclosporine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in the treatment of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 868–872.

Chrysomallis F, Ioannides D, Teknetzis A, Panagiotidou D, Minas A. Treatment of oral pemphigus vulgaris. Int J Dermatol 1994; 33: 803–807.

Published

2021-09-03

How to Cite

Kridin, K. . ., Hammers, C. M., Ludwig, R. J., Tzur Bitan, . D., & Cohen, A. D. (2021). Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 101(9), adv00535. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3831