Higher Doses of Oral Propranolol for Resistant Infantile Haemangio­mas

Authors

  • Isabelle Dreyfus Reference Center for rare diseases of the skin, CHU Toulouse Larrey, Toulouse, France
  • Charlène Dénos Reference Center for rare diseases of the skin, CHU Toulouse Larrey, Toulouse, France
  • Olivia Boccara Dermatology Department, Necker Children's Hospital, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • Sébastien Barbarot Department of Dermatology, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
  • Véronique Gagey-Caron Dermatology Cabinet, Nantes, France
  • Annabel Maruani Department of Dermatology, Unit of Pediatric Dermatology, University of Tours, Inserm 1246-SPHERE, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
  • Juliette Miquel Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, CHU La Réunion site Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France
  • Catherine Droitcourt Department of Dermatology and Venereology, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
  • Michèle Bigorre Orthopedic surgery and infantile plastic surgery, CHU Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
  • Ludovic Martin Department of Dermatology and Venereology, CHU Angers, Angers, France
  • Christine Leauté-Labrèze Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
  • Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier Reference Center for rare diseases of the skin, CHU Toulouse Larrey, Toulouse, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.43152

Keywords:

resistance, infantile haemangioma, propranolol

Abstract

Propranolol at 3 mg/kg/day is considered the gold standard for treating infantile haemangiomas. Nevertheless, the management of propranolol-resistant infantile haemangiomas (PRIH) remains challenging. This national multicentre retrospective observational study includes all PRIHs who received propranolol > 3 mg/kg/day. The study aims to investigate the pattern of PRIHs, assess the effects and tolerance of a higher dose, and identify predictive factors for response to this increased dosage. Fifteen PRIHs were included (prevalence 0.45%), mainly females, and most presented with a large lesion. Three distinct patterns of PRIH were identified: facial segmental lesions (47%), facial localized lesions with a subcutaneous component (40%), and body-localized mixed and ulcerated lesions (13%). Six PRIH (40%) responded to the higher dose (from 3.75 to 4 mg/kg/day). Three predictive factors were significantly associated with a good response: IGIc-IH1 at the end of 3 mg/kg/day regimen (OR = 22.9, 95% CI [1.2–1844.1]), a duration of 3.5 months or more at 3 mg/kg/day (OR = 17.5, 95% CI [1.22–250.37]), and 7 months or more at > 3 mg/kg/day (OR = 17.5, 95% CI [1.22–250.37]). Tolerance was generally good, although one patient experienced severe hypotension during dose escalation. Propranolol doses higher than 3 mg/kg/day may therefore be considered a potential treatment option for PRIHs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Léauté-Labrèze C, Harper JI, Hoeger PH. Infantile haemangioma. Lancet 2017; 390: 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00645-0

Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics 1976; 58: 218–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.58.2.218

Léauté-Labrèze C, Prey S, Ezzedine K. Infantile haemangioma: part I. Pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical features, life cycle and associated structural abnormalities. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011; 25: 1245–1253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04102.x

Chang LC, Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga E, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC, et al. Growth characteristics of infantile hemangiomas: implications for management. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 360–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2767

Jacobs AH. Strawberry hemangiomas; the natural history of the untreated Lesion. Calif Med 1957; 86: 8–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195705000-00023

Baselga E, Roe E, Coulie J, Muñoz FZ, Boon LM, McCuaig C, et al. Risk factors for degree and type of sequelae after involution of untreated hemangiomas of Infancy. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152: 1239–1243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2905

Léauté-Labrèze C, Prey S, Ezzedine K. Infantile haemangioma: Part II. Risks, complications and treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011; 25: 1254–1260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04105.x

Hoeger PH, Harper JI, Baselga E, Bonnet D, Boon LM, Atti MCD, et al. Treatment of infantile haemangiomas: recommendations of a European expert group. Eur J Pediatr 2015; 174: 855–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-015-2570-0

Drolet BA, Frommelt PC, Chamlin SL, Haggstrom A, Bauman NM, Chiu YE, et al. Initiation and use of propranolol for infantile hemangioma: report of a consensus conference. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 128–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1691

Léauté-Labrèze C, de la Roque ED, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo J-B, Taïeb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2649–2651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc0708819

Canadas KT, Baum ED, Lee S, Ostrower ST. Case report: Treatment failure using propranolol for treatment of focal subglottic hemangioma. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74: 956–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.05.012

Fuchsmann C, Quintal M-C, Giguere C, Ayari-Khalfallah S, Guibaud L, Powell J, et al. Propranolol as first-line treatment of head and neck hemangiomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137: 471–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.55

Chang L, Chen H, Yang X, Jin Y, Ma G, Lin X. Intralesional bleomycin injection for propranolol-resistant hemangiomas. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29: e128–e130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004152

Caussé S, Aubert H, Saint-Jean M, Puzenat E, Bursztejn A-C, Eschard C, et al. Propranolol-resistant infantile haemangiomas. Br J Dermatol 2013; 169: 125–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12417

Gnanasakthy A, Barrett A, Norcross L, D’Alessio D, DeMuro Romano C. Use of patient and investigator global impression scales: a review of food and drug administration-approved labeling, 2009 to 2019. Value Health 2021; 24: 1016–1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.005

Léaute-Labrèze C, Boccara O, Degrugillier-Chopinet C, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Prey S, Lebbé G, et al. Safety of oral propranolol for the treatment of infantile hemangioma: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20160353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0353

Onnis G, Dreyfus I, Mazereeuw-Hautier J. Factors associated with delayed referral for infantile hemangiomas necessitating propranolol. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32: 1584–1588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14842

Qiu T, Yang K, Dai S, Chen S, Ji Y. Clinical features of segmental infantile hemangioma: a prospective study. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2021; 17: 119–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S291059

Dávila-Osorio VL, Iznardo H, Roé E, Puig L, Baselga E. Propranolol-resistant infantile hemangioma successfully treated with sirolimus. Pediatr Dermatol 2020; 37: 684–686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.14163

Pratico AD, Caraci F, Pavone P, Falsaperla R, Drago F, Ruggieri M. Propranolol: effectiveness and failure in infantile cutaneous hemangiomas. Drug Saf Case Rep 2015; 2: 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40800-015-0009-1

Ritter MR, Moreno SK, Dorrell MI, Rubens J, Ney J, Friedlander DF, et al. Identifying potential regulators of infantile hemangioma progression through large-scale expression analysis: a possible role for the immune system and indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) during involution. Lymphat Res Biol 2003;1: 291–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/153968503322758094

Kaulanjan-Checkmodine P, Oucherif S, Prey S, Gontier E, Lacomme S, Loot M, et al. Is infantile hemangioma a neuroendocrine tumor? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 5140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095140

Zhou HH, Koshakji RP, Silberstein DJ, Wilkinson GR, Wood AJ. Altered sensitivity to and clearance of propranolol in men of Chinese descent as compared with American whites. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 565–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198903023200905

Ma X, ZhaoT, Ouyang T, Xin S, Ma Y, Chang M. Propranolol enhanced adipogenesis instead of induction of apoptosis of hemangiomas stem cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014; 7: 3809–3817.

Fernández Faith E, Shah S, Witman PM, Harfmann K, Bradley F, Blei F, et al. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and treatment interventions for ulceration in patients with infantile hemangioma. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157: 566–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0469

Meyer-Mueller C, Nicholson C, Polcari I, Boull C, Maguiness S. Worsening ulceration of infantile hemangioma after initiation or escalation of propranolol. Pediatr Dermatol 2022; 39: 255–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.14933

Chen T, Gudipudi R, Nguyen SA, Carroll W, Clemmens C. Should propranolol remain the gold standard for treatment of infantile hemangioma? A systematic review and meta-analysis of propranolol versus atenolol. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132: 332–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221089758

Warren D, Diaz L, Levy M. Diffuse hepatic hemangiomas successfully treated using sirolimus and high-dose propranolol. Pediatr Dermatol 2017; 34: e286–e287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.13219

Kaylani S, Theos AJ, Pressey JG. Treatment of infantile hemangiomas with sirolimus in a patient with PHACE syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol 2013; 30: e194–e197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12023

Greenberger S, Yuan S, Walsh LA, Boscolo E, Kang KT, Matthews B, et al. Rapamycin suppresses self-renewal and vasculogenic potential of stem cells isolated from infantile hemangioma. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 2467–2476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2011.300

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

Dreyfus, I., Dénos, C., Boccara, O., Barbarot, S., Gagey-Caron, V., Maruani, A., … Mazereeuw-Hautier, J. (2026). Higher Doses of Oral Propranolol for Resistant Infantile Haemangio­mas. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 106, adv43152. https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.43152