National Learning Objectives in Dermatology and Venereology for the New Swedish Medical Programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.44059Keywords:
Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Dermatology/education, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Learning, Professional Competence, Sexually Transmitted Diseases/education, Venereology/educationAbstract
Effective medical education relies on clearly defined learning objectives that foster deep and meaningful learning. This article presents a consensus-driven proposal for national learning objectives in dermatology and venereology within Sweden’s new medical programme qualifying for licensure. The primary aim is to harmonize educational standards across all medical faculties and to establish a common understanding of the expected level of knowledge and competence at the point of medical licensure. Using a structured approach, existing curricula were analysed and categorized according to a modified version of Bloom’s taxonomy. The initial list of objectives and core conditions was then expanded through input from invited educators at all participating medical faculties as well as practising GPs. One designated assessor from each institution independently reviewed the expanded material to determine the expected knowledge level for each condition and to assess whether any items fell outside the intended scope. This process resulted in the identification of 36 learning objectives, along with a list of 124 core diagnoses and/or medications. The learning objectives encompass knowledge, practical skills, and professional attitudes in the management of dermatological and sexually transmitted diseases. The next step is to implement them with the aim of evaluating their impact on dermatology and venereology education. In this future work, student involvement should be prioritized to ensure a learner-centred approach throughout the process.
Downloads
References
Läkartidingen. Nu rullas nya läkarutbildningen ut. 2021. Available from: https://lakartidningen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/2021/08/nu-rullas-nya-lakarutbildningen-ut/.
Ireland P, Rosen R, Spencer S, Nielssen A, Rosen R. Evaluating dermatology education in Australia: medical students’ and junior doctors’ perceptions. Australas J Dermatol 2023; 64: e145–e51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14000
Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.
Allouch S, Ali RM, Al-Wattary N, Nomikos M, Abu-Hijleh MF. Tools for measuring curriculum integration in health professions’ education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05618-5
Puerta Martinez F, Winterton D. Curriculum development in medical education – Part I: Laying the foundation with Kern’s framework. Clinics in Medical Education 2025; 1. Available from: https://medicaleducationclinic.com/articles-volume-1-issue-5-2025-01-02/
Singh M, Coulton A, King T, Salam A, Sharma M, Griffiths TW, et al. The British Association of Dermatologists’ Undergraduate Curriculum Update 2021. Clin Exp Dermatol 2021; 46: 710–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14534
American Academy of Dermatology Association. Basic dermatology curriculum: medical student resources. 2025. Available from: https://www.aad.org/member/education/residents/bdc
Hu A, Vender R. Undergraduate dermatology education in Canada: a national survey. J Cutan Med Surg 2018; 22: 31–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1203475417725876
Kliesener T, Jandek M, Navarini A, Brandt O, Müller S. Dermatology teaching for undergraduate medical students in clinical routine: a structured four-week curriculum. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04921-x
Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach 2001; 23: 123–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120036547
Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000; 34: 551–557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00697.x
Burge SM. Learning dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29: 337–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01463.x
Sharma M, Murphy R, Doody GA. Do we need a core curriculum for medical students? A scoping review. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e027369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027369
Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 1996; 32: 347–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20: 461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sam Polesie, John Paoli, Kari Nielsen, Andreas Sonesson, Alexander Shayesteh, Anna Josefson, Charlotta Enerbäck, Emma K. Johansson, Torborg Hoppe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized ActaDV contents is available freely online. The Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica owns the copyright for all material published until volume 88 (2008) and as from volume 89 (2009) the journal has been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work.
Unless otherwise specified, all Open Access articles are published under CC-BY-NC licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.