National Learning Objectives in Dermatology and Venereology for the New Swedish Medical Programme

Authors

  • Sam Polesie Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Gothenburg, Sweden; Center for Digital Health, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden
  • John Paoli Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Kari Nielsen Lund University Cancer Center, LUCC and Lund University Skin Cancer Research Group, LUSCaR Lund, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Sweden; Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Andreas Sonesson Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Alexander Shayesteh Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venereology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Anna Josefson School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Dermatology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
  • Charlotta Enerbäck Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • Emma K. Johansson Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Torborg Hoppe Department of Medical Sciences, Dermatology and Venereology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.44059

Keywords:

Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Dermatology/education, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Learning, Professional Competence, Sexually Transmitted Diseases/education, Venereology/education

Abstract

Effective medical education relies on clearly defined learning objectives that foster deep and meaningful learning. This article presents a consensus-driven proposal for national learning objectives in dermatology and venereology within Sweden’s new medical programme qualifying for licensure. The primary aim is to harmonize educational standards across all medical faculties and to establish a common understanding of the expected level of knowledge and competence at the point of medical licensure. Using a structured approach, existing curricula were analysed and categorized according to a modified version of Bloom’s taxonomy. The initial list of objectives and core conditions was then expanded through input from invited educators at all participating medical faculties as well as practising GPs. One designated assessor from each institution independently reviewed the expanded material to determine the expected knowledge level for each condition and to assess whether any items fell outside the intended scope. This process resulted in the identification of 36 learning objectives, along with a list of 124 core diagnoses and/or medications. The learning objectives encompass knowledge, practical skills, and professional attitudes in the management of dermatological and sexually transmitted diseases. The next step is to implement them with the aim of evaluating their impact on dermatology and venereology education. In this future work, student involvement should be prioritized to ensure a learner-centred approach throughout the process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Läkartidingen. Nu rullas nya läkarutbildningen ut. 2021. Available from: https://lakartidningen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/2021/08/nu-rullas-nya-lakarutbildningen-ut/.

Ireland P, Rosen R, Spencer S, Nielssen A, Rosen R. Evaluating dermatology education in Australia: medical students’ and junior doctors’ perceptions. Australas J Dermatol 2023; 64: e145–e51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14000

Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.

Allouch S, Ali RM, Al-Wattary N, Nomikos M, Abu-Hijleh MF. Tools for measuring curriculum integration in health professions’ education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05618-5

Puerta Martinez F, Winterton D. Curriculum development in medical education – Part I: Laying the foundation with Kern’s framework. Clinics in Medical Education 2025; 1. Available from: https://medicaleducationclinic.com/articles-volume-1-issue-5-2025-01-02/

Singh M, Coulton A, King T, Salam A, Sharma M, Griffiths TW, et al. The British Association of Dermatologists’ Undergraduate Curriculum Update 2021. Clin Exp Dermatol 2021; 46: 710–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14534

American Academy of Dermatology Association. Basic dermatology curriculum: medical student resources. 2025. Available from: https://www.aad.org/member/education/residents/bdc

Hu A, Vender R. Undergraduate dermatology education in Canada: a national survey. J Cutan Med Surg 2018; 22: 31–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1203475417725876

Kliesener T, Jandek M, Navarini A, Brandt O, Müller S. Dermatology teaching for undergraduate medical students in clinical routine: a structured four-week curriculum. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04921-x

Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach 2001; 23: 123–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120036547

Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000; 34: 551–557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00697.x

Burge SM. Learning dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29: 337–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01463.x

Sharma M, Murphy R, Doody GA. Do we need a core curriculum for medical students? A scoping review. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e027369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027369

Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 1996; 32: 347–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20: 461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

Polesie, S., Paoli, J., Nielsen, K., Sonesson, A., Shayesteh, A., Josefson, A., … Hoppe, T. (2026). National Learning Objectives in Dermatology and Venereology for the New Swedish Medical Programme. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 106, adv44059. https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.44059

Issue

Section

Special report