Can Foot Dermatophyte Infections Signal Future Diabetes Risk? Findings from a Register-based Study

Authors

  • Anne Sofie Frølunde Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5857-0626
  • Jan Brink Valentin Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-7179
  • Lise Kristensen Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Pernille Kræmer Schachsen Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Janus Laust Thomsen Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0745-6815
  • Christian Vestergaard Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-3158

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2025-0125

Keywords:

Onychomycoses 1, Tinea pedis 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 3

Abstract

Dermatophyte infections are common in general practice and occur more often in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but whether they signal undiagnosed T2D remains unclear. We conducted a register-based cohort study including positive PCR tests for dermatophyte infection from the feet or nails, matched 1:3 to individuals from the same geographic area in Denmark. Those with known diabetes, type 1 diabetes or aged under 20 were excluded. Incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for new-onset T2D were estimated using Poisson regression. The final cohort comprised 78,140 individuals, with a median age of 51 years, and 60.8% were male. The IR for T2D was 9.23 per 100 person-years in the exposed group and 9.00 in the unexposed group, with an adjusted IRR of 1.00 (0.91–1.11, p=0.94), indicating no significant association. In a sensitivity analysis excluding unexposed individuals with prior topical antifungal treatment, the IRR increased to 1.15 (1.08–1.23, p=0.001). While the primary analysis showed no significant association, the sensitivity analysis suggested a modest increased risk when exposure misclassification was reduced, supporting dermatophyte infection as a possible early signal of undiagnosed T2D in selected populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rigopoulos D, Larios G, Katsambas A. Skin signs of systemic diseases. Clin Dermatol 2011; 29: 531–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.09.021

Behm B, Schreml S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Skin signs in diabetes mellitus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26: 1203–1211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04475.x

Kirsner RS, Yosipovitch G, Hu S, Andriessen A, Hanft JR, Kim PJ, et al. Diabetic skin changes can benefit from moisturizer and cleanser use: a review. J Drugs Dermatol 2019; 18: 1211–1217.

Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, Uribe KB, et al. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176275

Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 183: 109119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119

Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 157: 107843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843

Gedebjerg A, Almdal TP, Berencsi K, Rungby J, Nielsen JS, Witte DR, et al. Prevalence of micro- and macrovascular diabetes complications at time of type 2 diabetes diagnosis and associated clinical characteristics: A cross-sectional baseline study of 6958 patients in the Danish DD2 cohort. J Diabetes Complications 2018; 32: 34–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.09.010

Ogurtsova K, Guariguata L, Barengo NC, Ruiz PLD, Sacre JW, Karuranga S, et al. IDF diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2021. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 183: 109118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109118

Beagley J, Guariguata L, Weil C, Motala AA. Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 103: 150–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.001

Spravchikov N, Sizyakov G, Gartsbein M, Accili D, Tennenbaum T, Wertheimer E. Glucose effects on skin keratinocytes: implications for diabetes skin complications. Diabetes 2001; 50: 1627–1635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.50.7.1627

Al-Mutairi N, Eassa BI, Al-Rqobah DA. Clinical and mycologic characteristics of onychomycosis in diabetic patients. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 2010; 18: 84–91.

Oz Y, Qoraan I, Oz A, Balta I. Prevalence and epidemiology of tinea pedis and toenail onychomycosis and antifungal susceptibility of the causative agents in patients with type 2 diabetes in Turkey. Int J Dermatol 2017; 56: 68–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.13402

Saunte DML, Holgersen JB, Haedersdal M, Strauss G, Bitsch M, Svendsen OL, et al. Prevalence of toe nail onychomycosis in diabetic patients. Acta Derm Venereol 2006; 86: 425–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0113

David Greenwood RS, Peutherer J, Barer M. Medical Microbiology. 17th ed. Elsevier; 2007.

Osman M, Kasir D, Rafei R, Kassem II, Ismail MB, El Omari K, et al. Trends in the epidemiology of dermatophytosis in the Middle East and North Africa region. Int J Dermatol 2022; 61: 935–968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.15967

Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycoses 2008; 51 Suppl 4: 2–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x

Blutfield MS, Lohre JM, Pawich DA, Vlahovic TC. The immunologic response to Trichophyton rubrum in lower extremity fungal infections. J Fungi 2015; 1: 130–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof1020130

Gupta AK, Wang T, Polla Ravi S, Mann A, Bamimore MA. Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective. Mycoses 2024; 67: e13725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13725

Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a common fungal infection. Crit Rev Microbiol 2015; 41: 374–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.856853

Navarro-Pérez D, Lázaro-Martínez JL, García-Oreja S, Pérez- Pérez T, Álvaro-Afonso FJ, Tardáguila-García A. Prevalence and risk factors predicting onychomycosis in patients with and without diabetes mellitus in Spain: a cross-sectional study. J Fungi 2024; 10: 790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110790

Dogra S, Kumar B, Bhansali A, Chakrabarty A. Epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients with diabetes mellitus in India. Int J Dermatol 2002; 41: 647–651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01528.x

Agrawal S, Singal A, Grover C, Das S, Arora VK, Madhu SV. Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients with diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in North India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2023; 89: 710–717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/IJDVL_360_2022

Sinikumpu SP, Auvinen J, Jokelainen J, Huilaja L, Puukka K, Ruokonen A, et al. Abnormal skin in toe webs is a marker for abnormal glucose metabolism. A cross-sectional survey among 1,849 adults in Finland. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 9125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09354-3

Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Adelborg K, Sundbøll J, Laugesen K, Ehrenstein V, et al. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records. Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11: 563–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S179083

Kildemoes HW, Sørensen HT, Hallas J. The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 38–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394717

Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125

Grann AF, Erichsen R, Nielsen AG, Frøslev T, Thomsen RW. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: The clinical laboratory information system (LABKA) research database at Aarhus University, Denmark. Clin Epidemiol 2011; 3: 133–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S17901

Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 541–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3

Gyldenkerne C, Mortensen MB, Kahlert J, Thrane PG, Warnakula Olesen KK, Sørensen HT, et al. 10-year cardiovascular risk in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82: 1583–1594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.015

Gupta AK, Stec N, Summerbell RC, Shear NH, Piguet V, Tosti A, et al. Onychomycosis: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34: 1972–1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16394

Lipner SR, Scher RK. Onychomycosis: Clinical overview and diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80: 835–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.062

Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Pacini G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev 2016; 37: 278–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1137

Zhou MH, Gold JAW, Hay RJ, Lipner SR. Association between atopic dermatitis and dermatophytosis: A TriNetX retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2026; 94: 361–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2025.09.073

Lee SW, Park J, Kim H, Jang J, Choi KM, Baek YS, et al. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 204: 110883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110883

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

Frølunde, A. S., Valentin, J. B., Kristensen, L., Schachsen, P. K., Thomsen, J. L., & Vestergaard, C. (2026). Can Foot Dermatophyte Infections Signal Future Diabetes Risk? Findings from a Register-based Study. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 106, adv–2025. https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2025-0125