The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Analysis of Elicit Against Human Reviewers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2025-0213Keywords:
artificial intelligence, Elicit, dermatologyDownloads
References
Borah R, Brown AW, Capers PL, Kaiser KA. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e012545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545
Khalil H, Ameen D, Zarnegar A. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 144: 22–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.005
Bernard N, Sagawa Y Jr, Bier N, Lihoreau T, Pazart L, Tannou T. Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit. BMC Med Res Methodol 2025; 25: 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02528-y
Johns JR, Vyas J, Ali FM, Ingram JR, Salek S, Finlay AY. The Dermatology Life Quality Index as the primary outcome in randomized clinical trials: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2024; 191: 497–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae228
Stephen HH, Douglas MJ. Appendix: Jadad scale for reporting randomized controlled trials. Evidence-based Obstetric Anesthesia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2005.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
Gusenbauer M. Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics 2019; 118: 177–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Vetter TR, Mascha EJ. Defining the primary outcomes and justifying secondary outcomes of a study: usually, the fewer, the better. Anesth Analg 2017; 125: 678–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002224
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized ActaDV contents is available freely online. The Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica owns the copyright for all material published until volume 88 (2008) and as from volume 89 (2009) the journal has been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work.
Unless otherwise specified, all Open Access articles are published under CC-BY-NC licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
