The efficiency of artificial intelligence methods for finding radiographic features in different endodontic treatments - a systematic review

Authors

  • Shaqayeq Ramezanzade a Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Section for Clinical Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Tudor Laurentiu b Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Azam Bakhshandah a Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Section for Clinical Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Bulat Ibragimov b Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Thomas Kvist c Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • EndoReCo
  • Lars Bjørndal a Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Section for Clinical Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2022.2158929

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, deep learning, endodontics, endodontic diagnosis, machine learning

Abstract

Abstract Objectives

To assess the efficiency of AI methods in finding radiographic features in Endodontic treatment considerations.

Material and methods

This review was based on the PRISMA guidelines and QUADAS 2 tool. A systematic search was performed of the literature on cases with endodontic treatments, comparing AI algorithms (test) versus conventional image assessments (control) for finding radiographic features. The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria were studies on the use of AI and machine learning in endodontic treatments using dental X-rays.

Results

The initial search retrieved 1131 papers, from which 24 were included. High heterogeneity of the materials left out a meta-analysis. The reported subcategories were periapical lesion, vertical root fractures, predicting root/canal morphology, locating minor apical foramen, tooth segmentation and endodontic retreatment prediction. Radiographic features assessed were mostly periapical lesions. The studies mostly considered the decision of 1–3 experts as the reference for training their models. Almost half of the included materials campared their trained neural network model with other methods. More than 58% of studies had some level of bias.

Conclusions

AI-based models have shown effectiveness in finding radiographic features in different endodontic treatments. While the reported accuracy measurements seem promising, the papers mostly were biased methodologically.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-08-18