Microhardness evaluation of silorane and methacrylate composites submitted to erosion and abrasion processes

Authors

  • Eloá Aguiar Gazola Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Marcos Augusto Rego Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil
  • William Cunha Brandt Department of Implantodology, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Maria Beatriz Freitas D’Arce Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil, ;Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884

Keywords:

Composite resins, microhardness, silorane composite resin, tooth erosion, tooth abrasion

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of methacrylate (MC) and silorane (SC) composites after being submitted to erosion and abrasion processes.

Material and methods: Forty samples were made with each composite: MC and SC. The samples were divided into eight groups (n = 10) according to the type of composite (G1–G4, MC; G5–G8, SC) and the beverages involved in the erosion process (G1 and G5 – Control (C), without erosion, with abrasion; G2 and G6 – Orange Juice (OJ), abrasion; G3 and G7 – Smirnoff Ice® (SI), abrasion; G4 and G8 – Gatorade® (GA), abrasion). The KHN test was performed 24 h after the last cycle of erosion/abrasion.

Results: The MC groups showed smaller KHN values for the SI group (p < 0.05) when compared to the Control and OJ groups; however, for the SC groups, no differences were found (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Methacrylate composite when submitted to acidic beverages erosive challenge combined with abrasive process might alter its surface microhardness. However, the beverages used in the present study were not able to interfere in silorane composite surface microhardness.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-23

How to Cite

Aguiar Gazola, E., Augusto Rego, M., Cunha Brandt, W., Freitas D’Arce, M. B., & Suzy Liporoni, P. C. (2015). Microhardness evaluation of silorane and methacrylate composites submitted to erosion and abrasion processes. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 1(2-4), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884