Cobalt-chromium alloys in fixed prosthodontics in Sweden

Authors

  • Maria Kassapidou Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden; Department of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Victoria Franke Stenport Department of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Lars Hjalmarsson Department of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; Specialist Dental Clinic, Folktandvården Sörmland AB, The Mälar Hospital, Eskilstuna, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden
  • Carina B. Johansson Department of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776

Keywords:

Prosthodontics, cobalt-chromium survey, dental technician

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compile the usage of Co-Cr alloys in fixed prosthodontics (FP) among dental laboratories in Sweden.

Methods: From March to October 2015, questionnaires were sent to 542 registered dental laboratories in Sweden. The questionnaires were divided in two parts, one for fixed dental-supported prosthodontics (FDP) and one for fixed implant-supported prosthodontics (FIP). Reminders were sent three times.

Results: In total of 542 dental laboratories, 55% answered the questionnaires. Most dental laboratories use Co-Cr in FP, 134 (74%) in FDP and 89(66%) in FIP. The laboratories used Co-Cr alloys of various compositions in the prostheses, 35 for FDP and 30 for FIP. The most commonly used Co-Cr alloys for tooth-supported FDPs were (a) Wirobond® 280, (b) Cara SLM and (c) Wirobond® C. For implant-supported frameworks the frequently used alloys were: (a) Cara SLM, (b) Cara Milled and (c) Wirobond® 280. Except for the difference in composition of these alloys, they were also manufactured with various techniques. In tooth-supported prostheses the dominating technique was the cast technique while newer techniques as laser-sintering and milling were more commonly reported for implant-supported constructions. A fourth technique; the ‘pre-state’ milling was reported in FDP.

Conclusion: More than 30 different Co-Cr alloys were reported as being used in FP. Thus, there is a need for studies exploring the mechanical and physical behavior and the biological response to the most commonly used Co-Cr alloys.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Kassapidou, M., Franke Stenport, V., Hjalmarsson, L., & Johansson, C. B. (2017). Cobalt-chromium alloys in fixed prosthodontics in Sweden. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 3(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776