Investigating the influence of titanium particle size and concentration on osteogenic response of human osteoblasts – in vitro study

Authors

  • Soumya Sheela Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • Waad Kheder College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • A B Rani Samsudin College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v11.40843

Keywords:

Titanium dioxide, osteoblasts, particles

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between the size and concentration of titanium particles and the osteogenic response of human osteoblasts (HOB). 

Materials and Methods: Different concentrations of titanium dioxide nano- and micro-particles were prepared and their biocompatibility on HOBs was analyzed using XTT assay. The changes in the actin cytoskeletal organization were studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) by HOBs after exposure to titanium dioxide particles was analyzed using ROS assay. Besides, the osteogenic potential represented by alkaline phosphatase activity, osteoprotegerin, macrophage colony stimulating factor levels, and biomineralization were analyzed.

Results: Short-term interaction of titanium dioxide nano- and micro-particles did not induce toxicity to HOBs. However, cells treated with 100 μg/mL titanium dioxide nano- and micro-particles demonstrated higher ROS generation compared to control. Besides, cells treated with 100 µg/mL titanium dioxide nanoparticles showed higher alkaline phosphatase activity, osteoprotegerin, macrophage colony stimulating factor levels and biomineralization compared to titanium dioxide microparticles. 

Conclusion: Collectively, the study found titanium dioxide nanoparticles to be more biocompatible than microparticles providing an insight into the capability of nanostructures in supporting osteoblast differentiation and its plausibility in biomedical applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Irandoust S, Müftü S. The interplay between bone healing and remodeling around dental implants. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60735-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60735-7

Kheder W, Al Kawas S, Khalaf K, Samsudin AR. Impact of ­tribocorrosion and titanium particles release on dental implant complications – a narrative review. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021;57:182–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.09.001

Costa BC, Alves AC, Toptan F, Pinto AM, Grenho L, Fernandes MH, et al. Exposure effects of endotoxin-free titanium-based wear particles to human osteoblasts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;95:143–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.003

Barrère F, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. Bone regeneration: molecular and cellular interactions with calcium phosphate ceramics. Int J Nanomed. 2006;1(3):317–32.

Yao JJ, Lewallen EA, Trousdale WH, Xu W, Thaler R, Salib CG, et al. Local cellular responses to titanium dioxide from orthopedic implants. Biores Open Access. 2017;6(1):94–103. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2017.0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2017.0017

Abdulhameed EA, Al-Rawi NH, Omar M, Khalifa N, Samsudin ABR. Titanium dioxide dental implants surfaces related oxidative stress in bone remodeling: a systematic review. PeerJ. 2022;10:e12951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12951

Kheder W, Soumya S, Samsudin AR. Impact of titanium dioxide particle size on macrophage production of intracellular reactive oxygen species. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;127:105133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105133

Niska K, Pyszka K, Tukaj C, Wozniak M, Radomski MW, Inkielewicz-Stepniak I. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhance production of superoxide anion and alter the antioxidant system in human osteoblast cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1095–107. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S73557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S73557

Zupan J, Jeras M, Marc J. Osteoimmunology and the influence of pro-inflammatory cytokines on osteoclasts. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(1):43–63. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.007

Yokoi Y. Osteoblast-like cell proliferation, alp activity and photocatalytic activity on sintered anatase and rutile titanium dioxide. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(16):4414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164414

Cheng W, Xu X, Lang Y, Cheng Z, Rizwan M, Tang X, et al. Anatase and rutile TiO2 nanoparticles lead effective bone damage in young rat model via the IGF-1 signaling pathway. Int J Nanomed. 2021;16:7233–47. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S333632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S333632

Gu Y, Wang Z, Shi J, Wang L, Hou Z, Guo X, et al. Titanium particle-induced osteogenic inhibition and bone destruction are mediated by the GSK-3β/β-catenin signal pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(6):e2878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.275

Santiago-Medina P, Sundaram PA, Diffoot-Carlo N. Titanium oxide: a bioactive factor in osteoblast differentiation. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:357653. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/357653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/357653

Martin TJ, Sims NA. RANKL/OPG; Critical role in bone physiology. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015;16(2):131–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-014-9308-6

Yao GQ, Sun BH, Weir EC, Insogna KL. A role for cell-surface CSF-1 in osteoblast-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;70(4):339–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-001-1079-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-001-1079-x

Khosla S. Minireview: the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Endocrinology. 2001;142(12):5050–5. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.12.8536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.142.12.5050

Mun SH, Park PSU, Park-Min KH. The M-CSF receptor in osteoclasts and beyond. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(8):1239–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0484-z

Gopinath VK, Soumya S, Jayakumar MN. Osteogenic and odontogenic differentiation potential of dental pulp stem cells isolated from inflamed dental pulp tissues (I-DPSCs) by two different methods. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020;78(4):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1702716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1702716

Olmedo DG, Paparella ML, Brandizzi D, Cabrini RL. Reactive lesions of peri-implant mucosa associated with titanium dental implants: a report of 2 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(5):503–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.007

Cionca N, Hashim D, Mombelli A. Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading? Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):241–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12180

Ren Y, Feng X, Lang X, Wang J, Du Z, Niu X. Evaluation of osteogenic potentials of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with different sizes and shapes. J Nanomater. 2020;2020:1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8887323

Chellappa M, Anjaneyulu U, Manivasagam G, Vijayalakshmi U. Preparation and evaluation of the cytotoxic nature of TiO2 nanoparticles by direct contact method. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S79978

AlHarthi MA, Soumya S, Rani A, Kheder W, Samsudin AR. Impact of exposure of human osteoblast cells to titanium dioxide particles in-vitro. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022;12(6):760–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.08.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.08.024

Tovani CB, Ferreira CR, Simão AMS, Bolean M, Coppeta L, Rosato N, et al. Characterization of the in vitro osteogenic response to submicron TiO2 particles of varying structure and crystallinity. ACS Omega. 2020;5(27):16491–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00900

Hou Y, Cai K, Li J, Chen X, Lai M, Hu Y, et al. Effects of titanium nanoparticles on adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:3619–30. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S38992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S38992

Choi MG, Koh HS, Kluess D, O’Connor D, Mathur A, Truskey GA, et al. Effects of titanium particle size on osteoblast functions in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(12):4578–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500693102

Sukwong P, Kongseng S, Chaicherd S, Yoovathaworn K, Tubtimkuna S, Pissuwan D. Comparison effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on immune cells in adaptive and innate immune system. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017;11(7):759–65. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0205

Villanueva-Flores F, Castro-Lugo A, Ramírez OT, Palomares LA. Understanding cellular interactions with nanomaterials: towards a rational design of medical nanodevices. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(13):132002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab5bc8

Farah ME, Sirotkin V, Haarer B, Kakhniashvili D, Amberg DC. Diverse protective roles of the actin cytoskeleton during oxidative stress. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2011;68(6):340–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20516

Saldaña L, Vilaboa N. Effects of micrometric titanium particles on osteoblast attachment and cytoskeleton architecture. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(4):1649–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.033

Gao J, Feng Z, Wang X, Zeng M, Liu J, Han S, et al. SIRT3/SOD2 maintains osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by regulating mitochondrial stress. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(2):229–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.144

Shaban S, El-Husseny MWA, Abushouk AI, Salem AMA, Mamdouh M, Abdel-Daim MM. Effects of antioxidant supplements on the survival and differentiation of stem cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:5032102. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5032102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5032102

Atkins GJ, Kostakis P, Pan B, Farrugia A, Gronthos S, Evdokiou A, et al. RANKL Expression is related to the differentiation state of human osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(6):1088–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.1088

Cadosch D, Gautschi OP, Chan E, Simmen HP, Filgueira L. Titanium induced production of chemokines CCL17/TARC and CCL22/MDC in human osteoclasts and osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92(2):475–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32390

Takeuchi S, Hirukawa K, Togari A. Acidosis inhibits mineralization in human osteoblasts. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93(3):233–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-013-9746-2

Plotkin LI, Aguilar-Perez A, Bivi N. Local Regulation of Bone Cell Function. In: Basic and Applied Bone Biology (D.B. Burr and Allen MR, editors). Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2019. p. 57–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813259-3.00004-X

Starlinger J, Sarahrudi K, Kecht M, Koerbler F, Pietschmann P, Aharinejad S. The influence of M-CSF on fracture healing in a mouse model. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01673-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01673-w

Zhang L, Haddouti EM, Welle K, Burger C, Wirtz DC, Schildberg FA, et al. The effects of biomaterial implant wear debris on osteoblasts. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00352

Arakaki N, Yamashita A, Niimi S, Yamazaki T. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells accompanied by mitochondrial morphological dynamics. Biomed Res. 2013;34(3):161–6. https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.34.161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.34.161

Pioletti DP, Kottelat A. The influence of wear particles in the expression of osteoclastogenesis factors by osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2004;25(27):5803–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.053

Published

2024-06-13

How to Cite

Sheela, S. ., Kheder, W., & Samsudin, A. B. R. (2024). Investigating the influence of titanium particle size and concentration on osteogenic response of human osteoblasts – in vitro study. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 11(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v11.40843