Effect of chemical post-processing on the compressive strength of MSLA 3D printed orthodontic models: an in vitro comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.44904Keywords:
MSLA 3D printing, compressive strength, post-processing, propylene glycol, orthodontic modelsAbstract
Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing, particularly Masked Stereolithography (MSLA), has emerged as a transformative technology in orthodontics for the fabrication of precise dental models. However, the mechanical integrity of these models, especially compressive strength, is critical during procedures such as thermoforming of clear aligners. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different chemical post-processing methods on the compressive strength of MSLA-printed dental models.
Materials and method: A total of 40 cylindrical resin samples (10 mm in height and 5 mm in diameter) were fabricated using an MSLA printer and divided into four groups (n = 10). Group 1: untreated group (acted as the control group), while Groups 2, 3, and 4 were treated with acetone, propylene glycol, and isopropyl alcohol, respectively. All treated samples were immersed in their respective chemicals for 5 min at room temperature. The compressive strength of each sample was measured utilising a Universal Testing Machine (UTM), and results were statistically analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Results: The compressive strength varied with statistical significance among the groups (p = 0.001). Compared to the untreated control group (107 ± 35 MPa), post-processing in propylene glycol (139 ± 48 MPa) or isopropyl alcohol (106 ± 10 MPa) resulted in statistically similar compressive strength, whereas post-processing in acetone (86 ± 19 MPa) led to significantly lower compressive strength. Furthermore, post-processing in propylene glycol resulted in significantly higher compressive strength than did post-processing in isopropyl alcohol or acetone. Propylene glycol showed greater variability, which makes its beneficial properties questionable.
Conclusion: In conclusion, chemical post-processing significantly influences the compressive strength of MSLA-printed models. Acetone had a deleterious impact on compressive strength. Isopropyl alcohol proved to be an acceptable solvent. Propylene glycol showed large variability in results, warranting further investigation.
Downloads
References
Attaran M. The rise of 3D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus Horiz. 2017;60(5):677–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011
Schmidleithner C, Kalaskar DM. Stereolithography. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen.
Hull CW, inventor; 3D Systems Inc, assignee. Method of and apparatus for production of three dimensional objects by stereo-lithography. United States patent US 5,236,637. 1993.
Dizon JR, Gache CC, Cascolan HM, Cancino LT, Advincula RC. Post-processing of 3D-printed polymers. Technologies. 2021;9(3):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9030061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9030061
Mayer J, Reymus M, Mayinger F, Edelhoff D, Hickel R, Stawarczyk B. Temporary 3D-printed fixed dental prosthesis materials: impact of postprinting cleaning methods on degree of conversion and surface and mechanical properties. Int J Prosthod. 2021;34(6):784–95. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7048
Groth CH, Kravitz ND, Shirck JM. Incorporating three-dimensional printing in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2018;52(1):28–33.
Riccio C, Civera M, Ruiz OG, Pedullà P, Rodriguez Reinoso M, Tommasi G, et al. Effects of curing on photosensitive resins in SLA additive manufacturing. Appl Mech. 2021;2(4):942–55. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech2040055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech2040055
Hassanpour M, Narongdej P, Alterman N, Moghtadernejad S, Barjasteh E. Effects of post-processing parameters on 3D-printed dental appliances: a review. Polymers. 2024;16(19):2795. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192795
International Organization for Standardization. Plastics – determination of compressive properties [Internet]. Geneva: ISO; 2002. Report No.: ISO 604:2002.
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR, editors. Phillips’ science of dental materials. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Elsevier Health Sci-ences; 2012.
Czajkowska M, Walejewska E, Zadrożny Ł, Wieczorek M, Święszkowski W, Wagner L, et al. Comparison of dental stone models and their 3D printed acrylic replicas for the accuracy and mechanical properties. Materials. 2020;13(18):4066. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184066
Joffe L. Current products and practices OrthoCAD™: digital models for a digital era. J Orthodon. 2004;31(4):344–7. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225026679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225026679
Jindal P, Juneja M, Siena FL, Bajaj D, Breedon P. Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners. Am J Orthodon Dentofac Orthoped. 2019;156(5):694–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.012
Tartaglia GM, Mapelli A, Maspero C, Santaniello T, Serafin M, Farronato M, Caprioglio A. Direct 3D printing of clear orthodontic aligners: current state and future possibilities. Materials. 2021;14(7):1799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071799
Lambart AL, Xepapadeas AB, Koos B, Li P, Spintzyk S. Rinsing postprocessing procedure of a 3D-printed orthodontic appli-ance material: impact of alternative post-rinsing solutions on the roughness, flexural strength and cytotoxicity. Dent Mater. 2022;38(8):1344–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.010
Percoco G, Lavecchia F, Galantucci LM. Compressive properties of FDM rapid prototypes treated with a low cost chemical finishing. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2012;4(19):3838–42.
Nowacki B, Kowol P, Kozioł M, Olesik P, Wieczorek J, Wacławiak K. Effect of post-process curing and washing time on me-chanical properties of mSLA printouts. Materials. 2021;14(17):4856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174856
Ledingham AD, English JD, Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, Ontiveros JC, Kasper FK. Accuracy and mechanical properties of orthodon-tic models printed 3Dimensionally from calcium sulfate before and after various postprinting treatments. Am J Orthodon Dentofac Orthoped. 2016;150(6):1056–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.027
Pantic O, Spasojevic M, Dzunuzovic E, Nikolic MS, Savic S, Markovic M, Spasojevic P. The effect of glycol derivatives on the properties of bio-based unsaturated polyesters. Polymers. 2022;14(15):2970. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14152970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14152970
Schroeder WF, Liu Y, Tomba JP, Soleimani M, Lau W, Winnik MA. Influence of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol on polymer diffusion in poly (butyl acrylate-co-methyl methacrylate) latex films. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114(9):3085–94. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9118875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9118875
Gao H, Kaweesa DV, Moore J, Meisel NA. Investigating the impact of acetone vapor smoothing on the strength and elongation of printed ABS parts. Jom. 2017;69:580–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2214-5
Garg A, Bhattacharya A, Batish A. Chemical vapor treatment of ABS parts built by FDM: analysis of surface finish and me-chanical strength. Int J Adv Manufac Technol. 2017;89:2175–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9257-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9257-1
Ekambaram M, Yiu CK, Matinlinna JP. An overview of solvents in resin–dentin bonding. Int J Adhes Adhesiv. 2015;57:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.09.007
Liu Y, Jin G, Lim JH, Kim JE. Effects of washing agents on the mechanical and biocompatibility properties of water-washable 3D printing crown and bridge resin. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60450-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60450-7
Hwangbo NK, Nam NE, Choi JH, Kim JE. Effects of the washing time and washing solution on the biocompatibility and me-chanical properties of 3D printed dental resin materials. Polymers. 2021;13(24):4410. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244410
Bae BG, Kim YH, Lee GH, Lee J, Min J, Kim H, et al. A study on the compressive strength of three-dimensional direct printing aligner material for specific designing of clear aligners. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):2489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86687-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86687-4
Jindal P, Juneja M, Bajaj D, Siena FL, Breedon P. Effects of post-curing conditions on mechanical properties of 3D printed clear dental aligners. Rapid Prototyp J. 2020;26(8):133744. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0118
Jungbauer R, Sabbagh H, Janjic Rankovic M, Becker K. 3D printed orthodontic aligners – a scoping review. Appl Sci. 2024;14(22):10084. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210084
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Neha Choudhary, Deepankar Bhatnagar, Swapna Sreenivasagan, Komal Yadav
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
