Influence of different post-polymerization methods on the dimensional accuracy of additively manufactured dental crowns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.45100Keywords:
Additive manufacturing, 3D-printing, post-polymerization, dimensional accuracy, dental crownsAbstract
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of different post-polymerization methods and types of polymerization units on the dimensional accuracy of additive manufactured (AM) permanent crown resins.
Methods: Three crown materials were evaluated: two permanent restoration-indicated resins (Saremco print Crowntec and Varseosmile Crownplus) and one long-term temporary resin (NextDent C&B MFH). These were additively manufactured and post-polymerized using four different polymerization units with varying protocols. Post-polymerization was performed either at room temperature or at 60°C, as well as without an inert medium, with glycerine, or with nitrogen as the inert medium. A typical mandibular molar full crown design was used and subtractively manufactured (SM) crowns served as the control group. Post-processed AM crowns were digitally scanned, and three specific regions (margin, intaglio surface and interproximal contacts) of the STL of the crowns were analyzed using Geomagic Control X software. Root Mean Square (RMS) and average deviation values were collected and statistically analyzed in PRISM version 9. Additionally, scanning electron microscopy analysis was conducted.
Results: The SM crowns exhibited the highest accuracy (the lowest RMS) for both the intaglio (18.6 ± 0.9 µm) and marginal surfaces (32.5 ± 3 µm). AM crowns showed variable accuracy depending on the post-polymerization method. Crowns post-polymerized in glycerine generally demonstrated lower RMS values. The glass filler-reinforced resin composite (Crowntec) material consistently exhibited higher RMS values (89 ± 5.4 µm to 120 ± 8.1 µm) across all regions studied. Post-polymerization temperatures did not significantly impact the dimensional accuracy of any of the materials studied (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Using glycerine during post-polymerization, alongside the manufacturer’s recommended polymerization unit, generally enhanced the dimensional accuracy of AM dental crowns. SM crowns demonstrated superior accuracy in the intaglio and marginal surfaces; however, no significant differences were observed in the interproximal compared to AM crowns.
Clinical significance: Given the variety of available post-polymerization units and protocols, dental practitioners should consider their impact on the dimensional accuracy of AM dental crowns. Awareness of these effects can help to prevent issues with crown accuracy, including adaptation to preparations and the contact points. Furthermore, this study provides alternative post-polymerization methods for practitioners lacking access to the manufacturer’s recommended equipment.
Downloads
References
van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:783948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783948
Chaudhary R, Fabbri P, Leoni E, Mazzanti F, Akbari R, Antonini C. Additive manufacturing by digital light processing: a review. Progr Addit Manuf. 2023;8(2):331–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00336-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00336-0
Abualsaud R, Alalawi H. Fit, precision, and trueness of 3D-printed zirconia crowns compared to milled counterparts. Dent J. 2022;10(11):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10110215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10110215
Cameron AB, Evans JL, Robb ND. A technical and clinical digital approach to the altered cast technique with an intraoral scanner and polyvinyl siloxane impression material. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(2):315–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.028
Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a literature-based review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):179–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
Kang S-Y, Park J-H, Kim J-H, Kim W-C. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(5):354–60. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354
Tsolakis IA, Papaioannou W, Papadopoulou E, Dalampira M, Tsolakis AI. Comparison in terms of accuracy between DLP and LCD printing technology for dental model printing. Dent J. 2022;10(10):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100181
Lim B, Kim D, Song JS, Kim S, Kim H, Shin Y. Influence of post-curing in nitrogen-saturated condition on the degree of conversion and color stability of 3D-printed resin crowns. Dent J. 2024;12:68. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12030068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12030068
Atria PJ, Bordin D, Marti F, Nayak VV, Conejo J, Benalcázar Jalkh E, et al. 3D‐printed resins for provisional dental restorations: comparison of mechanical and biological properties. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(5):804–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12888
Bayarsaikhan E, Lim J-H, Shin S-H, Park K-H, Park Y-B, Lee J-H, et al. Effects of postcuring temperature on the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of three-dimensional printed dental resin material. Polymers. 2021;13(8):1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081180
Al-Aali KA, Alhamdan RS, Maawadh AM, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T. Influence of contemporary CAD-CAM milling systems on the fit and adaptation of partially stabilized Zirconia fixed partial dentures. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3490
Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):285–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.012
Tieh MT, Waddell JN, Choi JJE. Optical and mechanical properties of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture teeth. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;126:105061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105061
Park J-Y, Bae S-Y, Lee J-J, Kim J-H, Kim H-Y, Kim W-C. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(3):159–69. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159
Lee B-I, You S-G, You S-M, Kang S-Y, Kim J-H. Effect of rinsing time on the accuracy of interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.24
Cao J, Liu X, Cameron A, Aarts J, Choi JJE. Influence of different post-processing methods on the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed photo-polymers for dental crown applications – a systematic review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;150:106314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106314
Zhang T, Zheng Y, Pradies G, Bai S. Factors affecting accuracy in the additive manufacturing of interim dental prosthesis: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.011
Lim J-H, Lee S-Y, Gu H, Jin G, Kim J-E. Evaluating oxygen shielding effect using glycerin or vacuum with varying temperature on 3D printed photopolymer in post-polymerization. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;130:105170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105170
Cornelio RB, Wikant A, Mjosund H, Kopperud HM, Haasum J, Gedde UW, et al. The influence of bis-EMA vs bis GMA on the degree of conversion and water susceptibility of experimental composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(6):440–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.856467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.856467
Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997;25(6):435–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00063-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00063-2
Shim JS, Kim J-E, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(4):468–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034
Sasany R, Jamjoom FZ, Uçar SM, Yilmaz B. Nanoindentation creep: the impact of water and artificial saliva storage on milled and 3D-printed resin composites. J Prosthodont. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13913
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jason Cao, Xiaoyun Liu, Andrew B. Cameron, John Aarts, Joanne Jung Eun Choi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
