Clinical applications and perceptions of bioceramics in endodontics: a cross-sectional survey

Authors

  • Kawther Belhaj Salah Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, University of Monastir, LR12SP10 University Hospital of Farhat Hached -University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5336-9169
  • Dorra Samet Private Practice. Research Laboratory: LR 12SP10: Functional and Aesthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillary, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
  • Hanen Boukhris Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, LR12SP10 University Hospital of Farhat Hached -University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-1872
  • Roua Habbachi Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, University of Monastir, LR12SP10 University Hospital of Farhat Hached -University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
  • Imen Gnaba Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, University of Monastir, LR12SP10 University Hospital of Farhat Hached -University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5043-8196
  • Souha Ben Youssef Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, LR12SP10 University Hospital of Farhat Hached -University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6568-9425

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.45127

Keywords:

Bioceramics, calcium silicate-based sealer, clinical Applications, clinical perception, mineral trioxide aggregate

Abstract

Background: Bioceramic materials have emerged as a significant advancement in endodontics, offering excellent biocompatibility, sealing ability, and bioactivity.

Their use has expanded in recent years, particularly for pulp capping, perforation repair, and regenerative procedures.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge of bioceramics among private practice dentists, evaluate the frequency of use of sealing and filling bioceramics, and examine the applied clinical protocols as well as potential shortcomings.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines, based on an epidemiological Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) survey. It was carried out among Tunisian private practice dentists. Data were processed and analyzed using Excel 2007 and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics 21.0. The sample size was calculated using the standard formula for estimating a proportion in a cross-sectional study, and participants were randomly selected. Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and confidential.

Results: A total of 200 dentists participated. Only 54.5% reported using sealing bioceramics, with 35.05% using them in all cases, 19.94% for periapical lesions, and 16.92% for root perforations. Approximately half of the dentists (53.01%) observed faster healing when using these sealers. Regarding filling bioceramics, 67.5% of participants used them, with a preference for MTA. These materials were indicated for various clinical situations, including repair of floor perforations, pulp capping, apexification of immature permanent teeth, and repair of root perforations. However, 45.61% of participants reported treatment failures when using these bioceramics, with failure to adhere to one of the endodontic treatment steps identified as the primary cause.

Conclusion: This study concluded that younger dentists tend to use bioceramics more frequently, filling bioceramics are better known than sealing ones, and most participants are familiar with the clinical indications of these materials. It is essential to provide further guidance and recommendations on the clinical application of bioceramics to optimize treatment outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rawat A, Geogi CC, Dubey S, Singh P. Bioceramics in endodontics – a review. IP Indian J Conserv Endod. 2022;7(4):163–71. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijce.2022.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijce.2022.037

Parirokh M, Torabinejad M, Dummer PMH. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part I: vital pulp therapy. Int Endod J. 2018;51(2):177–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12841

Torabinejad M, Parirokh M, Dummer PMH. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications. Int Endod J. 2018;51(3):284–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12843

Raghavendra SS, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, Kotadia P. Bioceramics in endodontics – a review. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1): S128–37. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.63659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.63659

Jitaru S, Hodisan I, Timis L, Lucian A, Bud M. The use of bioceramics in endodontics – literature review. Clujul Med 1957. 2016;89(4):470–3. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-612

Camilleri J. BiodentineTM microstructure and composition. In: About I, ed. BiodentineTM: properties and clinical applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80932-4_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80932-4_1

Kachari M. Bioceramic root canal sealers: a brief review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2023;9(3):418–19. https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i3f.1838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i3f.1838

Suwartini T, Santoso J, Widyarman AS, Ratnasari D. Efficacy of bioceramic and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers against pathogenic endodontic biofilms: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022;13(4):322–30. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_198_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_198_21

Donnermeyer D, Bürklein S, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology. 2019;107(4):421–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0400-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0400-3

Kebudi Benezra M, Schembri Wismayer P, Camilleri J. Influence of environment on testing of hydraulic sealers. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17280-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17280-7

Zhekov KI, Stefanova VP. Definition and classification of bioceramic endodontic sealers. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2021;63(6):901–4. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.63.e58912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.63.e58912

Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13 (Suppl 1):S31–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18

Mente J, Leo M, Panagidis D, Saure D, Pfefferle T. Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate: repair of root perforations-long-term results. J Endod. 2014;40(6):790–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.003

Guivarc’h M, Jeanneau C, Giraud T, Pommel L, About I, Azim AA, et al. An international survey on the use of calcium silicate-based sealers in non-surgical endodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(1):417–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02920-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02920-1

Ha W-N, Hawa A, Yardley J, Grandini S, Ricucci D. Use of MTA and biodentine among Australian endodontists: a survey. Aust Endod J. 2016;42(2):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12170

Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG. Are premixed calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers comparable to conventional materials? A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2017;43(4):527–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019

Khandelwal A, Janani K, Teja K, Jose J, Battineni G, Riccitiello F, et al. Periapical healing following root canal treatment using different endodontic sealers: a systematic review. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:3569281. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3569281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3569281

Yildirim T, Gencoglu N. Use of mineral trioxide aggregate in the treatment of large periapical lesions: reports of three cases. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(4):468–74. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697867

Saed SM, Ashley MP, Darcey J. Root perforations: aetiology, management strategies and outcomes. The hole truth. Br Dent J. 2016;220(4):171–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.132

Stefanova V, Zhekov K, Raycheva R. Application of bioceramic endodontic sealers in clinical practice. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(4):816–20. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.6462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.6462

Wavdhane MB, Bansode PV, Pathak SD, Priyadarshini L. Management of pulpal floor perforation using BIODENTINE: a clinical report. J Med Dent Sci Res [Internet]. 2021;8(2):1–5. Available from:https://questjournals.org/jmdsr/papers/vol8-issue2/2/A08020105.pdf [Accessed on April 2025]

Singla M, Verma KG, Goyal V, Jusuja P, Kakkar A, Ahuja L. Comparison of push-out bond strength of furcation perforation repair materials – glass ionomer cement type II, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(3):410–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18

Abdelmotelb MA, Gomaa YF, Khattab NMA, Elheeny AAH. Premixed bioceramics versus mineral trioxide aggregate in furcal perforation repair of primary molars: in vitro and in vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(8):4915–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03800-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03800-3

Al-Nazhan S, El Mansy I, Al-Nazhan N, Al-Rowais N, Al-Awad G. Outcomes of furcal perforation management using mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine: a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2022;30:e20220330. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0330

Wang X, Xiao Y, Song W, Ye L, Yang C, Xing Y, et al. Clinical application of calcium silicate-based bioceramics in endodontics. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):853. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04550-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04550-4

Bhasin P, Saraf BG, Chauhan S, Kumar H, Wahi P, Vats V. The successful interdisciplinary outcome of blunderbuss canal with an open apex using MTA under magnification: a case report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;17(1):97–101. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2740

Niang SO, Bane K, Kaboré AD, N’Diaye D, Léye-Benoist F, Faye B. Critères de succès et facteurs d’échec du traitement endodontique initial: revue de la littérature. Rev Iv Odonto Stomatol [Internet]. 2015;17(2):6–14. Available from: https://www.revues-ufhb-ci.org/fichiers/FICHIR_ARTICLE_333.pdf [Accessed on April 2025]

Çiçek E, Yılmaz N, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Koçak S, Bilgin B. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate apical plug thickness on fracture resistance of immature teeth. J Endod. 2017;43(10):1697–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.007

Pandey R, Kararia N, Sharma DK, Rathod V, Bansod AV, Desai D. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different endodontic sealers: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024;27(9):962. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_334_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_334_24

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Belhaj Salah, K., Samet, D., Boukhris, H., Habbachi, R., Gnaba, I., & Ben Youssef, S. (2025). Clinical applications and perceptions of bioceramics in endodontics: a cross-sectional survey. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 12(1), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.45127