In vitro effect of mouthwash containing chlorhexidine and chlorine dioxide against halitosis pathogens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45222Keywords:
Halitosis, chlorhexidine, chlorine dioxide, antimicrobial synergyAbstract
Objective: This study evaluated the antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine-chlorine dioxide (CHX-CDO) mouthwash formulations against major halitosis-related pathogens: Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), and Eikenella corrodens (Ec).
Materials and methods: Five bacterial strains were cultured anaerobically. Experimental mouthwashes with varying concentrations of CHX (0.01–0.2%) and CDO (0.05–0.1%), labeled solution A–J, were tested. Agar diffusion assays measured inhibition zones. MICs were determined by broth microdilution with 24 h anaerobic incubation and OD600 measurement. The time-kill test quantified CFUs from serial dilutions at time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h).
Results: All CHX-CDO mouthwash combinations inhibited bacterial growth, with A (0.05% CHX + 0.05% CDO), C (0.2% CHX + 0.05% CDO), F (0.2% CHX + 0.1% CDO), and J (CHX 0.02/CDO 0.1) showing the largest inhibition zones and G (CHX 0.01/CDO 0.05) and H (CHX 0.02/CDO 0.05) exhibiting the most favorable MIC values. Time-kill assays confirmed sustained bactericidal effects for low concentration-CHX/0.05% CDO formulations. Significant differences in antibacterial activity were observed among the formulations (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Low-dose CHX combined with 0.05% CDO mouthwash maintains antibacterial efficacy against halitosis-associated pathogens, suggesting a promising CHX dose reduction while preserving effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Degif R, Abaynew Y. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward halitosis among dental patients at Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1522682. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1522682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1522682
Akaji EA, Folaranmi N, Ashiwaju O. Halitosis: a review of the literature on its prevalence, impact and control. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2014;12:297–304. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a33135
Izidoro C, Botelho J, Machado V, Reis AM, Proença L, Alves RC, et al. Revisiting standard and novel therapeutic approaches in halitosis: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:11303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811303
Kapoor U, Sharma G, Juneja M, Nagpal A. Halitosis: current concepts on etiology, diagnosis and management. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:292–300. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.178294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.178294
Tangerman A, Winkel EG. Intra- and extra-oral halitosis: finding of a new form of extra-oral blood-borne halitosis caused by dimethyl sul-phide. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(9):748–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01116.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01116.x
Poppolo Deus F, Ouanounou A. Chlorhexidine in dentistry: pharmacology, uses, and adverse effects. Int Dent J. 2022;72:269–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.01.005
Szalai E, Tajti P, Szabó B, Hegyi P, Czumbel LM, Shojazadeh S, et al. Daily use of chlorine dioxide effectively treats halitosis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0280377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280377
Anna H, Barnabás P, Zsolt L, Romána Z. Tracking of the degradation process of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and chlorhexidine diglu-conate in the presence of hyper-pure chlorine dioxide in endodontic disinfection. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019;164:360–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2018.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2018.11.005
Buyukozer Ozkan H, Terlemez A, Orhan EO. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis of mixtures of chlorhexidine with different oxidizing agents activated by photon-induced photoacoustic streaming for root canal irrigation. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38:374–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4734
Thao TTP, Ngan LTM, Thuy PAV. Isolation and identification of porphyromonas gingivalis from sub-gingival plaque samples of patients with periodontitis. Ho Chi Minh City J Med. 2018;22(5):178.
Thao TTP, Ngan LTM, Van NTT, Thuy PAV. Isolation and storage Aggregatibacter actinomicetemcomitans from the subgingival plaque of patients with periodontitis. Sci Tech Dev J Health Sci. 2021;2(2):185–93. https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjhs.v2i2.467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjhs.v2i2.467
Thao TTP, Tham DT, Hung TT. Isolation and storage of Fusobacterium nucleatum from the subgingival plaque of patients with periodontitis. HIUJS. 2022;19:31–40.
Brookes ZLS, Bescos R, Belfield LA, Ali K, Roberts A. Current uses of chlorhexidine for management of oral disease: a narrative review. J Dent. 2020;103:103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103497
Mejía K, Rodríguez-Hernández AP, Martínez-Hernández M. Insights into the mechanism of action of chlorhexidine on Porphyromonas gingi-valis. Int J Dent. 2025;2025:1492069. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/1492069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/1492069
Jefri UHNM, Khan A, Lim YC, Lee KS, Liew KB, Kassab YW, et al. A systematic review on chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant. J Med Life. 2022;15:313–8. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0180
Deka A, Anil TA, Barua P, Paul R. An ex vivo comparative study determining the bactericidal activity of 3 different irrigants against Entero-coccus faecalis. Int J Oral Health Dent. 2017;3:85–8. https://doi.org/10.18231/2395-499X.2017.0020
Noszticzius Z, Wittmann M, Kály-Kullai K, Beregvári Z, Kiss I, Rosivall L, et al. Chlorine dioxide is a size-selective antimicrobial agent. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079157
Ogata N. Denaturation of protein by chlorine dioxide: oxidative modification of tryptophan and tyrosine residues. Biochemistry. 2007;46:4898–911. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi061827u DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi061827u
Medir M, Giralt F. Stability of chlorine dioxide in aqueous solution. Water Res. 1982;16:1379–82. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(82)90221-4
Andrés CMC, Lastra JMP, Andrés Juan C, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. Chlorine dioxide: friend or foe for cell biomolecules? A chemical approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:15660. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(82)90221-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660
Paraskevas S, Rosema NA, Versteeg P, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden GA. Chlorine dioxide and chlorhexidine mouthrinses compared in a 3-day plaque accumulation model. J Periodontol. 2008;79(8):1395–400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070630
Alvarado Rodríguez PY, Rodríguez Zaragoza DE, Ruiz-Reyes H. Comparison of the antimicrobial effect of chlorine dioxide, sodium hypo-chlorite, and chlorhexidine on bacteria isolated from the root canal. J Dent Oral Sci. 2022;4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.37191/Mapsci-2582-3736-4(4)-141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37191/Mapsci-2582-3736-4(4)-141
Nagy E, Boyanova L, Justesen US. How to isolate, identify, and deter- mine antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in routine laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1139–48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.008
Abbood HM, Hijazi K, Gould IM. Chlorhexidine resistance or cross resistance, that is the question. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12:798. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050798
Gränicher KA, Karygianni L, Attin T, Thurnheer T. Low concentrations of chlorhexidine inhibit the formation and structural integrity of enzyme-treated multispecies oral biofilms. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:741863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741863
Becker K, Brunello G, Scotti L, Drescher D, John G. Efficacy of 0.05% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash to elimi-nate living bacteria on in situ collected biofilms: an in vitro study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10:730. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060730
Drake D, Villhauer AL. An in vitro comparative study determining bactericidal activity of stabilized chlorine dioxide and other oral rinses. J Clin Dent. 2011;22:1–5.
Carda-Diéguez M, Rosier BT, Lloret S, Llena C, Mira A. The tongue biofilm metatranscriptome identifies metabolic pathways associated with the presence or absence of halitosis. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022;8(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00364-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00364-2
Kulis E, Cvitkovic I, Pavlovic N, Kumric M, Rusic D, Bozic J. A comprehensive review of antibiotic resistance in the oral microbiota: mecha-nisms, drivers, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025;14:828. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080828
Brookes Z, Teoh L, Cieplik F, Kumar P. Mouthwash effects on the oral microbiome: are they good, bad, or balanced? Int Dent J. 2023;73(Suppl 2):S74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2023.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2023.08.010
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thao Thi Phuong Tran, Thuy Anh Vu Pham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
