Effect of carbonate apatite nanoparticles on the physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of an experimental dental adhesive

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45433

Keywords:

Physicochemical properties, degree of conversion, water sorption/solubility, cytotoxicity, nanofillers, carbonate apatite, silanization, surface treatment, experimental adhesive

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating silanized and non-silanized carbonate apatite nanoparticles (CA5n) on the physicochemical properties and cytotoxicity of a hydrophilic experimental adhesive.

Materials and methods: A dental adhesive composed of 70% bisphenol A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate, 28.75% 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 0.25% camphorquinone, and 1% ethyl N, N-dimethyl-4-aminobenzoate was used. CA5n, synthesized with a CO₃/PO₄ molar ratio of 5, was used in both silanized and non-silanized forms at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2 or 4% (wt). The degree of conversion (DC) was measured using Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (n = 5) immediately, 5 minutes, and 60 minutes after curing. Water sorption and solubility were evaluated over 28 days (n = 6). The cytotoxicity of 24-hour and 7-day extracts (n = 6) was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay in triplicate. DC data were statistically analyzed using a mixed model. Independent-samples t-tests and Wilcoxon tests were used, depending on data normality, to analyze water sorption, solubility, and cell viability results. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: The addition of CA5n significantly increased the DC over time, regardless of the concentration or silanization status. All CA5n groups exhibited high water sorption and acceptable water solubility, unaffected by concentration or silanization. Water sorption increased significantly with higher CA5n concentrations compared to the control, except in the 0.5% non-silanized (NS) group. Water solubility remained below 7.5 µg/mm³ (ISO 4049 requirement), with no significant differences among groups. Cell viability decreased significantly across all experimental groups compared to the negative control, with similar effects observed in both 24-hour and 7-day extracts.

Conclusion: Adding CA5n to an experimental adhesive increased the DC and the water sorption. According to ISO 10993-5, the experimental adhesive, with and without CA5n, demonstrated low cytotoxicity potential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Haikel Y, Hardan L. A literature review of adhesive systems in dentistry: key components and their clinical applications. Appl Sci (Basel). 2024;14(18):8111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188111

Cadenaro M, Josic U, Maravić T, Mazzitelli C, Marchesi G, Mancuso E, et al. Progress in dental adhesive materials. J Dent Res. 2023;102(3):254–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221145673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221145673

Santos M, Fidalgo-Pereira R, Torres O, Carvalho O, Henriques B, Özcan M, et al. The impact of inorganic fillers, organic content, and polymerization mode on the degree of conversion of monomers in resin-matrix cements for restorative dentistry: a scoping review. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(8):454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05829-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05829-6

Rubaie AJ, Schulze KA. Polymer chemistry of dental adhesives. Pac J Health. 2022;5(1):1. https://doi.org/10.56031/2576-215x.1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56031/2576-215X.1014

Al-Abbas MAFAA, Al-Badr RJ, Shamash MSA. Long-term water sorption/solubility of two dental bonding agents containing a colloidal dispersion of titanium dioxide. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2023;14(2):142–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.japtr_47_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.japtr_47_23

Odabasi D, Guler C, Kucukaslan D. Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04005-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04005-2

Madhyastha PS, Naik DG, Natarajan S, Kumar Bhat MR, Vinodhini RS. Effects of water sorption and solubility on degradation of silorane and methacrylate-based dental composites. Indian J Dent Res. 2024;35(1):76–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_195_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_195_23

Zhou W, Liu S, Zhou X, Hannig M, Rupf S, Feng J, et al. Modifying adhesive materials to improve the longevity of resinous restorations. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):723. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030723

Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B. Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer? J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(2):117–32. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42304

de Cardoso GC, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, Jardim PDS, de Moraes RR. Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902578

Xia Y, Zhang F, Xie H, Gu N. Nanoparticle reinforced resin-based dental composites. J Dent. 2008;36(6):450–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.001

Provenzi C, Cb Leitune V, Collares FM, Trommer R, Bergmann CP, Samuel SM. Interface evaluation of experimental dental adhesives with nanostructured hydroxyapatite incorporation. Appl Adhes Sci. 2014;2:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-4351-2-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-4351-2-2

Par M, Spanovic N, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Tarle Z. Degree of conversion of experimental resin composites containing bioactive glass 45S5: the effect of post-cure heating. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54035-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54035-y

Braga RR. Calcium phosphates as ion-releasing fillers in restorative resin-based materials. Dent Mater J. 2019;35(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.288

Campos R, Oliveira C, Macedo J, França F, Basting R, Turssi C, et al. Effect of zinc chloride added to self-etching primer on bond strength to caries-affected dentin and chemical-physical-mechanical properties of adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;95:102412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102412

Farooq I, Ali S, Al-Saleh S, Alhamdan E, Alrefeai M, Abduljabbar T, et al. Synergistic effect of bioactive inorganic fillers in enhancing prop-erties of dentin adhesives – a review. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(13):2169. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132169

Ghiasi B, Sefidbakht Y, Mozaffari-Jovin S, Gharehcheloo B, Mehrarya M, Khodadadi A, et al. Hydroxyapatite as a biomaterial – a gift that keeps on giving. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2020;46(7):1035–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2020.1776321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2020.1776321

Cahyanto A, Liemidia M, Karlina E, Zakaria M, Shariff K, Sukotjo C, et al. Bioactive carbonate apatite cement with enhanced compressive strength via incorporation of silica calcium phosphate composites and calcium hydroxide. Materials. 2023;16(5):2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052071

Huang H, Luo L, Li L, Guan Y, Yan Y, Jiang Z, et al. Calcium phosphate cement promotes odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp cells in vitro and in vivo. Coatings. 2022;12(4):543. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12040543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12040543

Zhou L, Zhao S, Xing X. Effects of different signaling pathways on odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells: a review. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1272764. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1272764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1272764

Amir M, Jeevithan L, Barkat M, Fatima S, Khan M, Israr S, et al. Advances in regenerative dentistry: a systematic review of harnessing Wnt/β-Catenin in dentin-pulp regeneration. Cells. 2024;13(13):1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131153

Dipalma G, Inchingolo A, Guglielmo M, Morolla R, Palumbo I, Riccaldo L, et al. Nanotechnology and its application in dentistry: a systematic review of recent advances and innovations. J Clin Med. 2024;13(17):5268. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175268

Aktas OC, Puchert K, Vurucu EE, Ersöz B, Veziroglu S, Sen S. A review on nanocomposite coatings in dentistry. J Mater Sci. 2024;59(38):17991–8008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09915-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09915-8

Yotsova R, Peev S. Biological properties and medical applications of carbonate apatite: a systematic review. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(2):291. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16020291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16020291

International Standard Organization. ISO 10993-5-2009-biological evaluation of medical devices: Geneva. Part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxi-city.

Nakamura M, Hiratai R, Hentunen T, Salonen J, Yamashita K. Hydroxyapatite with high carbonate substitutions promotes osteoclast re-sorption through osteocyte-like cells. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(2):259–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00509

Lung CYK, Sarfraz Z, Habib A, Khan AS, Matinlinna JP. Effect of silanization of hydroxyapatite fillers on physical and mechanical properties of a bis-GMA based resin composite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;54:283–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.033

Matinlinna JP, Dahl JE, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The effect of trialkoxysi lane coupling agent coatings on e-glass fibers on the flexural prop erties of fiber-reinforced composites. In Mittal, KL (Ed.), Silanes and Other Coupling Agents. 2007;4: 83–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789067644525.i-410.44

Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Codan B, Agee K, Tay F, Dorigo E, et al. Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experi-mental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content. Dent Mater J 2010;26(4):288–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078

de Souza Balbinot G, Collares FM, Herpich TL, Visioli F, Samuel SMW, Leitune VCB. Niobium containing bioactive glasses as remineralizing filler for adhesive resins. Dent Mater J. 2020;36(2):221–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.014

Robertson L, Phaneuf M, Haimeur A, Pesun I, França R. Degree of conversion and oxygen-inhibited layer effect of three dental adhesives. Dent J (Basel). 2016;4(4):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4040037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4040037

Ling L, Chen Y, Malyala R. Assessment of degree of conversion and volumetric shrinkage of novel self-adhesive cement. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(5):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16050581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16050581

Al-Qahtani A, Tulbah H, Binhasan M, Shabib S, Al-Aali K, Alhamdan M, et al. Influence of concentration levels of β-tricalcium phosphate on the physical properties of a dental adhesive. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(5):853. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050853

International Standard Organization;ISO 4049:2019: Geneva. Dentistry – polymer-based restorative materials.

Esteban Florez FL, Kraemer H, Hiers RD, Sacramento C, Rondinone A, Silvério K, et al. Sorption, solubility and cytotoxicity of novel antibac-terial nanofilled dental adhesive resins. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70487-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70487-z

Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater J. 2006;22(10):973–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020

da Silva EM, Amaral CM, Jardim RN, Barbosa MP, Rabello TB. Influence of specimen dimension, water immersion protocol, and surface roughness on water sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative materials. Materials. 2024;17(5):984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17050984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17050984

Morisbak E, Uvsløkk S, Samuelsen JT. In vitro effects of dental monomer exposure – dependence on the cell culture model. In Vitro Toxi-col. 2020;67:104906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104906

Carneiro K, Araujo T, Carvalho E, Meier M, Tanaka A, Carvalho C, et al. Bioactivity and properties of an adhesive system functionalized with an experimental niobium-based glass. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;78:188–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.016

Chladek G, Barszczewska-Rybarek I, Chrószcz-Porębska M, Mertas A. The effect of quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles on bacterial adherence, cytotoxicity, and physical and mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43851-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43851-y

D'Acierno F, Liu L, Nguyen T, Michal C, Palma-Dibb R, Carvalho R, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of a dental resin adhesive con-taining hydrophobic chitin nanocrystals. Dent Mater J. 2022;38(12):1855–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.013

Al-Hamdan R, Almutairi B, Kattan H, Alsuwailem N, Farooq I, Vohra F, et al. Influence of hydroxyapatite nanospheres in dentin adhesive on the dentin bond integrity and degree of conversion: a scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman, Fourier Transform-Infrared (FTIR), and microtensile study. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(12):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122948

Shah PK, Stansbury JW. Role of filler and functional group conversion in the evolution of properties in polymeric dental restoratives. Dent Mater J. 2014;30(5):586–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.015

Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. The effect of filler and silane content on conversion of resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2003;19(4):327–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00062-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00062-3

Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P. Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res. 2008;87(1):84–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700115

Bendary IM, Garcia IM, Collares FM, Takimi A, Samuel SMW, Leitune VCB. Wollastonite as filler of an experimental dental adhesive. J Dent. 2020;102:103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103472

Li X, Liang S, Inokoshi M, Zhao S, Hong G, Yao C, et al. Different surface treatments and adhesive monomers for zirconia-resin bonds: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024;60:175–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.05.004

Rifane T, Cordeiro K, Silvestre F, Souza M, Zanotto E, Araújo-Neto V, et al. Impact of silanization of different bioactive glasses in simplified adhesives on degree of conversion, dentin bonding and collagen remineralization. Dent Mater J. 2023;39(2):217–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.01.005

Michelotti G, Niedzwiecki M, Bidjan D, Dieckmann P, Deari S, Attin T, et al. Silane effect of universal adhesive on the composite-composite repair bond strength after different surface pretreatments. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(4):950. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12040950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040950

Araújo-Neto V, Moreira M, Ñaupari-Villasante R, De Paula D, Medeiros S, Loguercio A, et al. Nanofiller particles and bonding durability, water sorption, and solubility of universal adhesives. Oper Dent. 2021;46(6):690–7. https://doi.org/10.2341/20-239-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/20-239-L

Esteves S, Barcellos D, Silva T, Silva M, Campos T, Rosetti E, et al. How Water Content Can Influence the Chemomechanical Properties and Physical Degradation under Aging of Experimental Adhesives. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:5771341. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5771341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5771341

Robakowska M, Gierz Ł. Effect of nanosilica fillers on photopolymerisation behaviour and mechanical performance of dental resin compo-sites. Coatings. 2025;15(11):1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15111316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15111316

ElEmbaby AES, Nassar AE, Elawsya ME. Impact of silica nanoparticles incorporation on the properties of resin infiltration: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05107-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05107-7

Kazak M, Sarialioglu Gungor A, Ozman Z, Donmez N. Comparative cell viability of dentin-bonding adhesive systems on human dental pulp stem cells: time-dependent analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):663. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04438-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04438-9

Ohlsson E, Bolay C, Arabulan S, Galler K, Buchalla W, Schmalz G, et al. In-vitro cytotoxicity of self-adhesive dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2024;40(4):739–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.015

Diemer F, Stark H, Helfgen E, Enkling N, Probstmeier R, Winter J, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of different dental resin-cements on human cell lines. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021;32(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06471-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06471-w

Şişmanoğlu S, Demirci M, Schweikl H, Ozen-Eroglu G, Cetin-Aktas E, Kuruca S, et al. Cytotoxic effects of different self-adhesive resin ce-ments: cell viability and induction of apoptosis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(2):89–99. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.89

Maletin A, Ristic I, Veljovic T, Ramic B, Puskar T, Jeremic-Knezevic M, et al. Influence of dimethacrylate monomer on the polymerization efficacy of resin-based dental cements – FTIR analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(2):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020247

Janani K, Teja K, Sandhya R, Alam M, Al-Qaisi R, Shrivastava D, et al. Monomer elution from three resin composites at two different time interval using high performance liquid chromatography – an in-vitro study. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(24):4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244395

Vervliet P, De Nys S, Duca R, Boonen I, Godderis L, Elskens M, et al. Identification of chemicals leaching from dental resin-based materials after in vitro chemical and salivary degradation. Dent Mater J. 2022;38(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.006

Garcia IM, Assad-Loss TF, Schneider LFJ, Collares FM, Cavalcante LMA, Tostes MA. Cytotoxicity evaluation, antibacterial effect, and de-gree of conversion of QAM-containing adhesives. Braz Oral Res. 2024;38:e001. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0001

Maimansomsuk S, Teangrom P, Teanchai C, Sinthuvanich C, Ruengket P, Attarataya J, et al. Methacrylic acid/tween 80 engineered amor-phous calcium phosphate as an effective bioactive reinforcing nanofillers in dental adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2025;44(2):190–200. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2024-285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2024-285

Wawrzynkiewicz A, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, et al.The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three dental universal adhesives – an in vitro study. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):3950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950

Published

2026-02-11

How to Cite

AbdelRazik, H. E., Dahl, J. E., & Kopperud, S. E. (2026). Effect of carbonate apatite nanoparticles on the physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of an experimental dental adhesive. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 13(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45433