Effect of salivary pH variations on the adhesive performance of Transbond XT and Orthocem in orthodontic bracket bonding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45568Keywords:
Orthodontic brackets, shear bond strength, Transbond XT, Orthocem, salivary pH, adhesive systemsAbstract
Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to acrylic resin specimens with two adhesive systems, Transbond XT and Orthocem, under different salivary pH levels (4, 5, 6, and 7).
Materials and methods: A total of 120 acrylic resin specimens (Brava Block®, FGM) were prepared and randomly assigned to three groups: control bonded with Transbond XT and Orthocem with no salivary exposure (n = 24), Transbond XT (n = 48), and Orthocem (n = 48). Each adhesive group was subdivided and immersed in artificial saliva at pH 4, 5, 6, or 7 for 30 days. Metal premolar brackets (Vector+ Roth prescription, Aditek®) were bonded following manufacturers’ protocols and subjected to shear bond strength testing using a Universal Testing Machine, following ISO 4049 standards. Data were analyzed with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), t-test, and Tukey tests at a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results: Transbond XT consistently showed higher bond strength than Orthocem across all pH levels. Maximum resistance was observed at pH 7 (21.19 ± 5.06 MPa), followed by the control group (19.64 ± 5.28 MPa). Orthocem demonstrated significantly lower values, ranging from 9.51 ± 3.87 MPa (pH 5) to 4.94 ± 2.15 MPa (pH 6). Acidic conditions reduced the bond strength of both adhesives, but Transbond XT maintained clinically reliable values, while Orthocem was more susceptible to performance decline at moderately acidic levels.
Conclusions: Salivary pH directly influenced adhesive performance. Transbond XT demonstrated superior resistance under all conditions, whereas Orthocem showed lower but still clinically acceptable shear bond strength values, except at pH 6, where a marked decrease was observed.
Downloads
References
Abdelnaby YL, Al-Wakeel Eel S. Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:208–14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.034
Almosa N, Zafar H. Incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34:744–50.
https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.15012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.15012
Castillejos Cartas L, Sáez Espínola G, Álvarez Gayosso C, Herrera Chávez MG. Bond strength of brackets bonded with resin in contact with an alcoholic beverage. Rev Mex Ortod. 2014;2:e166–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2395-9215(16)30143-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2395-9215(16)30143-X
Mitic V, Todorovic A, Mitic A. A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36:1477–84.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13282
Juneja R, Duhan J, Tewari S, Sangwan P, Bhatnagar N. Effect of blood contamination and decontamination protocols on acetone-based and ethanol-based total etch adhesive systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26:403–16.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12089
Lon L, Knop L, Shintcovsk R, Filho O, Raveli D. Shear bond strength of three different bonding systems for orthodontic brackets. Braz J Oral Sci. 2018;17:1–7.
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883
Shaik M, Pattanaik S, Pathuri S, Arunachalam S. Shear bond strength of different adhesive materials used for bonding orthodontic brackets: a comparative in vitro study. Orthod J Nepal. 2016;5:22.
https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v5i1.14495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v5i1.14495
Sen Yilmaz B, Yildirim Z, Seker E, Ozden F, Kurt G. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives with integrated primer: a comparative study. APOS Trends Orthod. 2023;13:1–7.
https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_218_2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_218_2022
Buktare K, Parikh S, Shah J. Comparative evaluation of salivary flow rate, pH, and alkaline phosphatase in tobacco users and healthy individuals: a biomarker study. J Int Oral Health. 2024;16:479.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_122_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_122_24
Iosif C, Cuc S, Prodan D, Moldovan M, Petean I, Labunet A, et al. Mechanical properties of orthodontic cements and their behavior in acidic environments. Materials. 2022;15(22):7904.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227904
Contreras A, López A, Arriola-Guillén L. Effect of different levels of salivary pH on the shear bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems for bracket placement: an in-vitro study. J Orofac Sci. 2020;12:47.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_109_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_109_19
Toodehzaeim MH, Khanpayeh E. Effect of saliva pH on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12:257–62.
Ganiger CR, Sathe TT, Pawar R, Phaphe S, Ronad YA, Mane P, et al. Comparative evaluation of the effect of different salivary pH on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets – an in vitro study. Int J Dent Sci Innov Res. 2020;3:578–85.
Campoy MD, Plasencia E, Vicente A, Bravo LA, Cibrián R. Effect of saliva contamination on bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137:679–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.032
Maia SRC, Cavalli V, Liporoni PCS, Do Rego MA. Influence of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 2010;138:79–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.035
Maia LH, Lopes Filho H, Ruellas AC, Araújo MT, Vaitsman DS. Corrosion behavior of self-ligating and conventional metal brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014;19:108–14.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.108-114.oar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.108-114.oar
Rodríguez-Chávez JA, Flores-Ruiz HM, Flores-Ledesma A, García-Pérez A, Bazán-Diaz L. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of metallic and aesthetic bracket meshes before and after debonding. Korean J Orthod. 2025;55:15–25.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.073
Hamdy TM. Evaluation of compressive strength, surface microhardness, solubility and antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer dental cement reinforced with silver doped carbon nanotube fillers. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:777.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03542-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03542-6
Mallmann A, Ataíde JC, Amoedo R, Rocha PV, Jacques LB. Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements using different specimen dimensions. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21:204–8.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000300003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000300003
Ionta FQ, Mendonça FL, De Oliveira GC, De Alencar CR, Honório HM, Magalhães AC, et al. In vitro assessment of artificial saliva formulations on initial enamel erosion remineralization. J Dent. 2014;42:175–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.009
Calabrese L, Fabiano F, Bonaccorsi LM, Fabiano V, Borsellino C. Evaluation of the clinical impact of ISO 4049 in comparison with miniflexural test on mechanical performances of resin based composite. Int J Biomater. 2015;2015:149798.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/149798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/149798
Huerta E, Corona JE, Oliva AI, Avilés F, González-Hernández J. Universal testing machine for mechanical properties of thin materials. Rev Mex Fis. 2010;56:317–22.
Hellak A, Ebeling J, Schauseil M, Stein S, Roggendorf M, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6307107.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6307107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6307107
Tallani S, Singla R, Singla N, Natarajan M, Kukkila J. Clinical performance of light-cured orthodontic adhesives for bonding brackets – an in-vitro study. F1000Res. 2023;12:1442.
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141328.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141328.1
Uslu F, Gunes TE, Akin M, Akman H. A comparison of the effectiveness of combined primer and adhesive systems in orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2025;14:4892.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144892
Rodríguez-Chávez JA, Arenas-Alatorre J, Flores-Ruiz HM, Flores-Ledesma A, Aguilar-Pérez FJ. Evaluation of enamel loss by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets place with four different adhesives. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84:912–20.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23652
Roedel L, Bednarzig V, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U, Zorzin J. Self-adhesive resin cements: pH-neutralization, hydrophilicity, and hygroscopic expansion stress. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1735–41.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1947-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1947-4
Ganiger C, Agarwal N, Pawar R, Phaphe S, Ahammed Y, Mane P, et al. To evaluate the shear bond strength of bondable molar tubes by two enamel conditioning techniques. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;9:2507–10.
https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/545
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lismory Karina Leiton Narváez, Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata, Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas, Yalil Rodríguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
