Surface roughness and microhardness of 3D printed denture base resins when printed with different printers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45751Keywords:
3D printing, additive manufacturing, denture base, digital light processingAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of using different printers on surface roughness and hardness of different 3D printed dentures.
Methods: Three denture base resins (ASIGA, NextDent, and FormLabs) were printed with one of two printers: ASIGA or NextDent. Surface roughness was measured with a non-contact profilometer, while a surface hardness tester was used to measure Vicker’s hardness values. One-way and Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and t-test were used to compare means with a significance level set at 0.05.
Results: FormLabs and NextDent specimens showed different hardness values when different printers were used (p < 0.001), while ASIGA specimens had no difference (p = 0.072). Roughness values were similar with NextDent specimens printed with different printers (p = 0.053), while ASIGA and FormLabs specimens’ roughness values were significantly influenced by the printer used (p < 0.001). When printed with ASIGA, ASIGA and NextDent specimens had similar hardness values, which were higher than FormLabs specimens. When NextDent printer was used, ASIGA specimens showed superior hardness values compared to NextDent and FormLabs. When comparing surface roughness of different resin specimens printed with the same printer, differences were observed among all specimens (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The type and brand of the printer used can affect surface properties of printed dentures. When the same printer was used, surface roughness and hardness were significantly different among all resin materials. The choice of resin material and printer combination affects both surface roughness and microhardness.
Clinical Significance: The choice of resin material and printer type may significantly impact the microhardness and surface roughness of 3D printed dentures. Careful material and printer selection is essential to ensure optimal clinical performance and longevity of prostheses.
Downloads
References
Wagner SA, Kreyer R. Digitally fabricated removable complete denture clinical workflows using additive manufacturing techniques. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:133–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13318
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ. Additive manufacturing for complete denture fabrication: a narrative review. J Prosthodont. 2022;31:47–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13426
Ishida Y, Kuwajima Y, Kobayashi T, Yonezawa Y, Asack D, Nagai M, et al. Current implementation of digital dentistry for removable prosthodontics in US dental schools. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:7331185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7331185
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0
Watanabe H, Fellows C, An H. Digital technologies for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin. 2022;66:567–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2022.05.006
Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73:178–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12164
Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:34–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60015-8
Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Finger I. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:351–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.014
Wimmer T, Gallus K, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Complete denture fabrication supported by CAD/CAM. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:541–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.016
Al-Qarni FD, Goodacre CJ, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Paravina RD. Stainability of acrylic resin materials used in CAD-CAM and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:880–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.004
Alhallak K, Hagi-Pavli E, Nankali A. A review on clinical use of CAD/CAM and 3D printed dentures. Br Dent J. 2023:1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-5401-5
Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics. J Dent. 2015;16:1.
Russo LL, Zhurakivska K, Guida L, Chochlidakis K, Troiano G, Ercoli C. Comparative cost-analysis for removable complete dentures fabricated with conventional, partial, and complete digital workflows. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131:689–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.023
Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219:521–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092010
Anadioti E, Musharbash L, Blatz MB, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P. 3D printed complete removable dental prostheses: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01328-8
Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive manufacturing techniques in prosthodontics: where do we currently stand? A critical review. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:474–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5079
Emir F, Ayyildiz S. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65:365–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_579
Anadioti E, Kane B, Zhang Y, Bergler M, Mante F, Blatz MB. Accuracy of dental and industrial 3D printers. J Prosthodont. 2022;31:30–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13470
Yousef H, Harris BT, Elathamna EN, Morton D, Lin WS. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128:1041–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.028
Yoo SY, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim JG. Dimensional accuracy of dental models for three-unit prostheses fabricated by various 3D printing technologies. Materials. 2021;14:1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061550
Lai YC, Yang CC, Levon JA, Chu TG, Morton D, Lin WS. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies. J Prosthodont. 2023;32:519–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13588
Yıldırım Ö, Yeşil Z, Hatipoğlu Ö. Effect of different 3D-printing systems on the flexural strength of provisional fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05470-z
Chen H, Cheng DH, Huang SC, Lin YM. Comparison of flexural properties and cytotoxicity of interim materials printed from mono-LCD and DLP 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126:703–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.003
Nemeth A, Vitai V, Czumbel ML, Szabo B, Varga G, Keremi B, et al. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models – a network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2023;134:104532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104532
Nulty A. A comparison of trueness and precision of 12 3D printers used in dentistry. BDJ Open. 2022;8:14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00108-6
Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Kamnoedboon P, Mekki M, Durual S, Özcan M, et al. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. J Dent. 2021;114:103785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103785
Lee HE, Alauddin MS, Mohd Ghazali MI, Said Z, Mohamad Zol S. Effect of different vat polymerization techniques on mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed denture base. Polymers. 2023;15:1463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061463
Al-Dulaijan YA, Alsulaimi L, Alotaibi R, Alboainain A, Alalawi H, Alshehri S, et al. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of 3D printed resins. Materials. 2022;15:6822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196822
Prpić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:524–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13175
Fouda SM, Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Ellakany P, AlRumaih HS, Khan SQ, et al. Flexural properties and hardness of CAD-CAM denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2024;32:318–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13535
Wada J, Wada K, Gibreel M, Wakabayashi N, Iwamoto T, Vallittu PK, et al. Effect of 3D printer type and use of protection gas during post-curing on some physical properties of soft occlusal splint material. Polymers. 2022;14:4618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214618
Carvalho-Silva JM, Gaspar CS, dos Reis AC, Teixeira ABV. Denture stomatitis: treatment with antimicrobial drugs or antifungal gels? A systematic review of clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134:1108-1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.014
Azab A, Abdelhady WA, Elwakeel E, Ashraf M, Wally R, Soliman A, et al. Systematic review and meta analysis of mechanical properties of 3D printed denture bases compared to milled and conventional materials. Sci Rep. 2025;15:29207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14288-2
Al‐Dwairi ZN, Al Haj Ebrahim AA, Baba NZ. A comparison of the surface and mechanical properties of 3D printable denture‐base resin material and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodont. 2023;32:40–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13491
Fouda SM, Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Ellakany P, AlRumaih HS, Farooqi FA, et al. In vitro evaluation of Candida albicans adhesion and related surface properties of CAD-CAM denture base resins. Eur J Dent. 2024;18:579–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774319
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faisal D. Al-Qarni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
