Influence of expanded graphene on physical and chemical properties, and in vitro toxicity of glass ionomer cements for luting

Authors

  • Sarah Pereira Martins Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
  • Carolina Mara Geraldino Monteiro São Leopoldo Mandic College, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Renan Rocha da Silva Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Andrea Vaz Braga Pintor Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Marcela Baraúna Magno Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Maria Augusta Visconti University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Maria Teresa Villela Romanos Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Livia Rodrigues de Menezes Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Institute of Macromolecules, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Lucianne Cople Maia Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Matheus Melo Pithon Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45910

Keywords:

Glass ionomer cement, nanomaterials, chemical properties, expanded graphene

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate physical and chemical properties and in vitro toxicity of six luting glass ionomer cements (GICs) – Vidrion, Vitro Cem, Meron, Gold Label (GCGL), GC Fuji Plus (GCFP), and Riva Luting – incorporated with expanded graphene to correct the GICs’ deficiencies.

Methodology: Expanded graphene was incorporated into GICs at concentrations of 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1%. Disc-shaped specimens (4 × 2 mm) were fabricated and submitted to an erosive challenge (EC) by immersion in 30 mL of lactic acid/lactate solution (pH 2.74) for 24 h at 37°C. Thickness, surface roughness (Ra), and microhardness were evaluated before and after EC. Fluoride release was measured in the acid solution. Radiopacity was evaluated in specimens (15 ± 1 mm; n = 3), and gray values were analyzed with ImageJ. Cytotoxicity was assessed by the neutral red uptake assay using L929 fibroblasts exposed to DMEM extracts.

Results: No microhardness loss after EC was observed in Vitro Cem 0.25% (p = 0.056) and 0.5% (p = 0.457) or Meron 0.5% (p = 0.167), while Vidrion 0.5% showed increased hardness (p < 0.001). Surface roughness remained unchanged in Meron, GCGL, and Riva Luting. Riva Luting containing 0.25% (p < 0.01) and 1% rGO (p < 0.01) released more fluoride compared with the control. GCGL showed improved cell viability at all expanded graphene concentrations. Vidrion demonstrated greater radiopacity with expanded graphene addition, and Meron exhibited enhanced radiopacity at all concentrations. Worsening effects were observed, including reduced fluoride release in GCFP 1% (p < 0.05), decreased cell viability in GCFP (45% reduction), Meron, and Vitro Cem at all percentages, and increased microhardness loss in Vitro Cem 1%, Meron 0.5%, and GCFP at all concentrations.

Conclusion: Expanded graphene incorporation produced positive, neutral, and negative effects depending on the GIC and concentration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Collado-González M, Pecci-Lloret MR, Tomás-Catalá CJ, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Llena C, et al. Thermo-setting glass ionomer cements promote variable biological responses of human dental pulp stem cells. Dent Mater. 2018;34:932–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.015

Nicholson JW. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to teeth: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;69:33–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.012

Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials: fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23:343–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022

Sidhu SK, Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of glass-ionomer materials: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 2001;14:387–96.

Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: from conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10(4):411–20.

Alsunbul H, Khan AA, Alqahtani YM, Hassan SA, Asiri W, Saadaldin S, et al. Using functionalized micron-sized glass fibres for the synergistic effect of glass ionomer on luting material. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(11):550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14110550

Qasim SSB, Ali D, Soliman MS, Zafiropoulos GG. The effect of chitosan- derived silver nanoparticles on mechanical properties and color stability of glass ionomer luting cements. Mater Res Express. 2021;8:085401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac1cd5

Saran R, Upadhya NP, Ginjupalli K, Amalan A, Rao B, Kumar S. Effect on physical and mechanical properties of conventional glass ionomer luting cements by incorporation of all-ceramic additives: an in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:8896225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8896225

Khan AA, Bari A, Al-Kheraif AA, Alsunbul H, Alhaidry H, Alharthi R, et al. Oxidized natural biopolymer for enhanced surface, physical and mechanical properties of glass ionomer luting cement. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15:2679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122679

Leung GKH, Wong AWY, Chu CH, Yu OY. Update on dental luting materials. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10:208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10110208

Xie H, Cao T, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Luong-Van EK, Rosa V. Graphene for the development of the next generation of biocomposites for dental and medical applications. Dent Mater. 2017;33(7):765–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.008

Sari F, Ugurlu M. Reinforcement of resin-modified glass- ionomer cement with glass fiber and graphene oxide. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;142:105850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105850

Sun L, Yan Z, Duan Y, Zhang J, Liu B. Improvement of the mechanical, tribological and antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements by fluorinated graphene. Dent Mater. 2018;34(6):e115–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.006

Chen J, Zhao Q, Peng J, Yang X, Yu D, Zhao W. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of reduced graphene-silver nanoparticle nanocomposite modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 2020; 96:103332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103332

Willers AE, Lussi A, Schlueter N, Carvalho TS. Effect of erosive challenge with hydrochloric acid on restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(8):5189–5203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04487-w

Oliveira LC, Dos Santos PH, Ramos FSS, Moda MD, Briso ALF, Fagundes TC. Wear, roughness and microhardness analyses of single increment restorative materials submitted to different challenges in vitro. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):247–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00554-6

Silva FWGP, Queiroz AMD, Freitas ACD, Assed S. Utilização do ionômero de vidro em odontopediatria. Odontol Clín Cient. 2011;10:13–17.

Brito CR, Velasco LG, Bonini GA, Imparato JC, Raggio DP. Glass ionomer cement hardness after different materials for surface protection. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93(1):243–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32524

Causton BE. The physico-mechanical consequences of exposing glass ionomer cements to water during setting. Biomaterials. 2001;22:112–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(81)90008-9

Cury JA, de Oliveira BH, dos Santos AP, Tenuta LMA. Are fluoride- releasing dental materials clinically effective on caries control? Dent Mater. 2016;32(3):323–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.002

Jordão TRS, Souza JCM, Gonçalves LM, Bresciani E, Rangel EC, Lisboa-Filho PN. Effect of graphene incorporation on fluoride release and physicochemical properties of glass ionomer cements. Restor Dent Endod. 2024;49:e37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e37

Liu R, Wang E, Guo Y, Zhou Q, Zheng Y, Zhai J, et al. Enhanced antibacterial properties and promoted cell proliferation in glass ionomer cement modified with fluorinated graphene. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2021;19:22808000211037487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000211037487

Zhang X, Li Z, Liu Y, Gao J, Wang J, Zhang L. Fluorinated graphene: a new material for biomedical applications. Nanoscale. 2013;5(3):859–64.

Robinson JT, Perkins FK, Snow ES, Wei Z, Sheehan PE. Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. Nano Lett. 2011;11(9):3875–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/nl2019855

Ou L, Song B, Liang H, Liu J, Feng X, Deng B, et al. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. J Appl Toxicol. 2016;36(10):1236–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

Josic U, Teti G, Ionescu AC, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Cokic S, et al. Cytotoxicity and microbiological behavior of universal resin composite cements. Dent Mater. 2024;40(10):1515–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.004

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Martins, S. P., Geraldino Monteiro, C. M., da Silva, R. R., Pintor, A. V. B., Magno, M. B., Visconti, M. A., … Pithon, M. M. (2026). Influence of expanded graphene on physical and chemical properties, and in vitro toxicity of glass ionomer cements for luting. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 13(1), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45910