Impact of red propolis addition on the color stability and surface roughness of glass ionomer cements

Authors

  • Giovanna Kelly Melo de Lima Sampaio Department of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Arcoverde, Pernambuco, Brazil
  • Pedro Henrique Sette-de-Souza Department of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Arcoverde, Pernambuco, Brazil
  • Basílio Rodrigues Vieira Department of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Arcoverde, Pernambuco, Brazil
  • Geisa Aiane de Morais Sampaio Department of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Arcoverde, Pernambuco, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45991

Keywords:

Glass ionomer cements, propolis, roughness, color variation

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness (SR) and color stability of ­conventional restorative glass ionomer cements (GICs) modified with the addition of red propolis ethanolic extract (RPEE) as an antimicrobial agent.

Methodology: Four GICs (Riva, Maxxion, Vidrion, and Ketac) were used with the addition of RPEE at ­concentrations of 11% and 20%. For the control groups, the GICs were manipulated according to the manufacturers’ instructions. SR was assessed using a surface profilometer. For the color variation analysis, the specimens’ colors were measured in the CIE Lab* color space using a spectrophotometer. The Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s test, was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Results: The addition of RPEE did not negatively affect the SR of Riva, Maxxion, and Ketac GICs (p = 0.796, p = 0.111, and p = 0.858, respectively). By contrast, a significant reduction in SR was observed in Vidrion GIC with the addition of RPEE (p = 0.009). When comparing the different GIC brands, Riva and Ketac exhibited the lowest SR, with significant differences relative to Vidrion (p = 0.008) and Maxxion (p = 0.006). Both RPEE concentrations (11% and 20%) caused major color changes in all GICs tested, with no statistical differences between the two concentrations (p = 1.000), nor among the different GIC brands (p = 0.071).

Conclusion: The incorporation of RPEE into conventional GIC did not increase SR, though in the case of Vidrion cement, it resulted in a significant reduction of this parameter. Conversely, the addition of red propolis at both 11% and 20% concentrations caused significant and clinically unacceptable color changes in all tested cements, regardless of brand or concentration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Saridena USNG, Sanka GSSJ, Alla RK, Ramaraju AV, Sajjan MCS, Mantena SR. Properties of glass ionomer dental materials. Int J Dent Mater. 2022;4(4):89-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37983/IJDM.2022.4403

Mylonas P, Zhang J, Banerjee A. Conventional glass-ionomer cements – a guide for practitioners. Dent Update. 2021;48(8):643–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2021.48.8.643

Hatunoglu E, Ozturk F, Bilenler T, Aksakalli S, Simsek N. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of propolis added to glass ionomer cement. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:368–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/020413-101.1

Marti LM, Mata M, Ferraz-Santos B, Azevedo ER, Giro EM, Zuanon AC. Addition of chlorhexidine gluconate to a glass ionomer cement: a study on mechanical, physical and antibacterial properties. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(1):33–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302328

Meneses IHC, Sampaio GAM, Carvalho FG, Carlo HL, Münchow EA, Pithon MM, et al. In vivo biocompatibility, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of cements modified with propolis in different concentrations. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(1):77–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702255

De Morais Sampaio GA, Lacerda-Santos R, Cavalcanti YW, Vieira GHA, Nonaka CFW, Alves PM. Antimicrobial properties, mechanics, and fluoride release of ionomeric cements modified by red propolis. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(4):522–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/083120-759.1

Sherief DI, Fathi MS, Abou El Fadl RK. Antimicrobial properties, ­compressive strength and fluoride release capacity of essential oil-modified glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.

Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):1879–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03493-0

Esmeraldo MR, Carvalho MG, Carvalho RA, Lima RF, Costa EM. Inflammatory effect of green propolis on dental pulp in rats. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27(5):417–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013005000022

Ferreira FB, Torres SA, Rosa OP, Ferreira CM, Garcia RB, Marcucci MC, et al. Antimicrobial effect of propolis and other substances against selected endodontic pathogens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(5):709–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.019

Grenho L, Barros J, Ferreira C, Santos VR, Monteiro FJ, Ferraz MP, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of propolis containing nanohydroxyapatite. Biomed Mater. 2015;10(2):025004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/10/2/025004

Andrade JKS, Denadai M, de Oliveira CS, Nunes ML, Narain N. Evaluation of bioactive compounds potential and antioxidant activity of brown, green and red propolis from Brazilian northeast region. Food Res Int. 2017;101:129–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.08.066

Machado BAS, Silva RPD, Barreto GdA, Costa SS, Silva DFd, Brandão HN, et al. Chemical composition and biological activity of extracts obtained by supercritical extraction and ethanolic extraction of brown, green and red propolis derived from different geographic regions in Brazil. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145954

Rufatto LC, Dos Santos DA, Marinho F, Henriques JAP, Ely MR, Moura S . Red propolis: Chemical composition and pharmacological activity. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2017; 7(7): 591–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.06.009

Sampaio GAM, Lacerda-Santos R, Cavalcanti YW, Vieira GHA, Nonaka CFW, Alves PM. Biocompatibility of ionomeric cements modified by red propolis: a morphological and immunohistochemical analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(5):515–22.

Almeida TMO, Borges MHN, Sette-de-Souza PH, Pinheiro MA, Vieira BR, Sampaio GAM. Incorporation of red propolis into ionomer restorative cements: an antimicrobial and fluoride release analysis. Braz Dent Sci. 2025;28(4):e4697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2025.e4697

Nunes Borges MH, de Oliveira Almeida TM, Sette-de-Souza PH, Pinheiro MA, Vieira BR, de Morais Sampaio GA. Antimicrobial efficacy of light-cured glass ionomer cements incorporating red propolis extract. Biomater Investig Dent. 2025;12:44895.

Ching HS, Luddin N, Kannan TP, Ab Rahman I, Abdul Ghani NRN. Modification of glass ionomer cements on their physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):557–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12413

Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu A, Garcia-Godoy F, Brambilla E.

Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: a review of the current literature. Am J Dent. 2015;28(6):311–20.

Alkhadim YK, Hulbah MJ, Nassar HM. Color shift, color stability, and post-polishing surface roughness of esthetic resin composites. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(6):1376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061376

Saraceni CHC, Neves ACA, Borges MCC, Araujo CT, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Zanata RL. In vitro evaluation of glass ionomer cement surface roughness submitted to different finishing procedures. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(3):411–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-064

Tüzüner T, Dimkov A, Nicholson JW. The effect of antimicrobial additives on the properties of glass-ionomer dental cements: a review. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2019;5(1):9–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1539623

Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3

Schmalz G, Galler KM. Biocompatibility of biomaterials – ­lessons learned and considerations for the design of novel materials. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):382–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.011

Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb7030016

Nicholson JW, Sidhu SK, Czarnecka B. The acid-base setting reaction and properties of glass-ionomer cements. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(11):2510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112510

Hill R. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future. Br Dent J. 2022;232(9):653–657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4239-1

Sidhu SK. Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J. 2011;56(Suppl 1):23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01293.x

Menezes-Silva R, Cabral LM, Pascotto RC, Borges AF, Martins CC, Navarro MF, et al. Mechanical and optical properties of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements – a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20200034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0357

Bala O, Arisu HD, Yikilgan I, Arslan S, Gullu A. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(1):79–86. PMID: 22229011

Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(Suppl 1):S1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149

Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptance and perceptibility thresholds for visual and instrumental color differences in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(2):103–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12465

Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Effect of herbal extracts on the color stability and surface roughness of restorative materials Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(6):824–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_592_18

Abdallah RM, Abdelghany AM, Aref NS. Optical and mechanical characterization of glass ionomer cement modified by propolis extract. Int J Biomater. 2020;2020:3180879.

Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Neeraja G, Pillai S. Antibacterial effect of plant extracts incorporated in glass ionomer cement. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(5):400–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.400

do Amaral GS, Negrini T, Maltz M, Arthur RA. Restorative materials containing antimicrobial agents: is there evidence for their antimicrobial and anticaries effects? A systematic review. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(1):6–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12338

Carvalho ILD, Borges MHN, Sampaio GAM, Almeida TMO, Pinheiro MA, Vieira BR, Sette-de-Souza PH. Color stability and surface characteristics of glass ionomer cements modified with red propolis extract. Biomater Investig Dent. 2025;12(1):274–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.44895

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

How to Cite

Sampaio, G. K. M. de L., Sette-de-Souza, P. H., Vieira, B. R., & Sampaio, G. A. de M. (2026). Impact of red propolis addition on the color stability and surface roughness of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 13(1), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45991