Comparison of physico-mechanical properties of 3D-printed resins used as permanent indirect restoration materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46113Keywords:
3D printing, dental resin, CAD/CAM, microhardness, surface roughness, flexural strengthAbstract
Objective: To compare the physico-mechanical properties (microhardness, surface roughness, and flexural strength) of permanent 3D-printed dental resins with those of a resin nanoceramic computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) block and a composite resin.
Methods: Four groups were tested: composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic), resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM block (Cerasmart), and two 3D-printed resins (Saremco Crowntec, VarseoSmile Crown Plus). Disk- and bar-shaped specimens were prepared according to ISO standards. Microhardness (Vickers test), surface roughness (profilometer), and flexural strength (three-point bending test) were evaluated. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests (p < 0.05).
Results: Cerasmart showed the highest microhardness (85.53 ± 3.97) and flexural strength (184.45 ± 9.42), while Saremco Crowntec exhibited the lowest microhardness (38.63 ± 2.14). Clearfil Majesty had the highest surface roughness (1.24 ± 0.35). Although the measured flexural strength values of 3D-printed resins exceeded the ISO 4049 minimum threshold, several samples were close to or below the limit.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, 3D-printed permanent resins exhibited mechanical properties comparable to conventional restorative materials in certain parameters, although inferior hardness values were observed compared to CAD/CAM blocks. Nevertheless, the present findings should be interpreted with caution, and further long-term clinical investigations are necessary before translating these results into clinical practice.
Downloads
References
Dejak B, Młotkowski A. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dent Mater. 2015;31(3):e77–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.016
Watanabe H, Fellows C, An H. Digital technologies for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2022;66(4):567–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2022.05.006
Andonović V, Vrtanoski G. Growing rapid prototyping as a technology in dental medicine. Mech Eng Sci J. 2010;29(1):31–9.
Lee W-S, Lee D-H, Lee K-B. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(4):265–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry – a review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):171–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12566
Peskersoy C, Oguzhan A. Evaluation of the mechanical and adhesion characteristics of indirect restorations manufactured with three-dimensional printing. Polymers. 2024;16(5):613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16050613
Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34(2):192–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003
Alshamrani AA, Raju R, Ellakwa A. Effect of printing layer thickness and postprinting conditions on the flexural strength and hardness of a 3D‐printed resin. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022(1):8353137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8353137
Zhang Q, Davis AY, Black MS. Emissions and chemical exposure potentials from stereolithography vat polymerization 3D printing and post-processing units. ACS Chem Health Saf. 2022;29(2):184–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.2c00002
Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K. A review of 3D printing in dentistry: technologies, affecting factors, and applications. Scanning. 2021;2021(1):9950131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
C. Espinar, A.D. Bona, M.M. Pérez et al. The influence of printing angle on color and translucency of 3D printed resins for dental restorations. Dental Materials 39 (2023) 410–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.03.011
Katreva I, Dikova T, Abadzhiev M, Tonchev T, Dzhendov D, Simov M. 3D-printing in contemporary prosthodontic treatment. Scr Sci Med Dent. 2016;2(1):7–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14748/ssmd.v1i1.1446
Daher R, Ardu S, di Bella E, Krejci I, Duc O. Efficiency of 3D printed composite resin restorations compared with subtractive materials: evaluation of fatigue behavior, cost, and time of production. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(5):943–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.001
Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(2):72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003
Ellakany P, Fouda SM, AlGhamdi MA, Aly NM. Comparison of the color stability and surface roughness of 3-unit provisional fixed partial dentures fabricated by milling, conventional and different 3D printing fabrication techniques. J Dent. 2023;131:104458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104458
Nulty, A. B. 3D Printing Part 1 - A History and Literature Review Of 3D Printing in Dentistry. Preprints 2021, 2021050221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202105.0221.v1
Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
Tsolakis IA, Gizani S, Panayi N, Antonopoulos G, Tsolakis AI. Three-dimensional printing technology in orthodontics for dental models: a systematic review. Children. 2022;9(8):1106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081106
Lo Giudice A, Ronsivalle V, Rustico L, Aboulazm K, Isola G, Palazzo G. Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):303–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03999-1
Temizci T, Bozoğulları HN. Effect of thermocycling on the mechanical properties of permanent composite-based CAD-CAM restorative materials produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing techniques. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04016-z
Revilla‐León M, Morillo JA, Att W, Özcan M. Chemical composition, knoop hardness, surface roughness, and adhesion aspects of additively manufactured dental interim materials. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(8):698–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13302
Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):760–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002
Sahin Z, Ozer N, Kιlιçarslan M. Mechanical characteristics of composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing. Eur J Prosthodont Restorat Dent. 2023;31(3):278–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2478Sahin08
Wu C-J. CAD/CAM technology in dentistry: a comparative analysis of milling and 3D printing techniques. MedScien. 2025;1(3):1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61173/4bserq28
Alharbi N, Alharbi A, Osman R. Stain susceptibility of 3D-printed nanohybrid composite restorative material and the efficacy of different stain removal techniques: an in vitro study. Materials. 2021;14(19):5621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195621
Lozada MIT, Rondón AKA, Cordeiro IB, Borella PS, Junqueira PC, Mendonça G. Physicomechanical properties of 3D printed resins for producing definitive dental crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;S0022-3913(25)00345-7.
Husain NA-H, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Abou-Ayash S, Özcan M. Effect of hydrothermal aging on the microhardness of high-and low-viscosity conventional and additively manufactured polymers. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):822.e821–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.022
Borella PS, Alvares LA, Ribeiro MT, Moura GF, Soares CJ, Zancope K. Physical and mechanical properties of four 3D-printed resins at two different thick layers: an in vitro comparative study. Dent Mater. 2023;39(8):686–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.06.002
Karaoğlanoğlu S, Aydın N, Oktay E, Ersöz B. Comparison of the surface properties of 3D-printed permanent restorative resins and resin-based CAD/CAM blocks. Oper Dent. 2023;48(5):588–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/23-006-L
Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Dve S. Mechanical properties and nternal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):384–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.001
Lee E-H, Ahn J-S, Lim Y-J, Kwon H-B, Kim M-J. Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on the color stability and stainability of a 3D-printed resin material. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(5):784.e781–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.024
Shim JS, Kim J-E, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(4):468–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034
Prause E, Malgaj T, Kocjan A, Beuer F, Hey J, Jevnikar P. Mechanical properties of 3D‐printed and milled composite resins for definitive restorations: an in vitro comparison of nitial strength and fatigue behavior. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(2):391–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13132
Çakmak G, Donmez MB, de Paula MS, Akay C, Fonseca M, Kahveci Ç. Surface roughness, optical properties, and microhardness of additively and subtractively manufactured CAD‐CAM materials after brushing and coffee thermal cycling. J Prosthodont. 2025;34(1):68–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13796
Shin J-W, Kim J-E, Choi Y-J, Shin S-H, Nam N-E, Shim J-S. Evaluation of the color stability of 3D-printed crown and bridge materials against various sources of discoloration: an in vitro study. Materials. 2020;13(23):5359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235359
Arnold C, Monsees D, Hey J, Schweyen R. Surface quality of 3D-printed models as a function of various printing parameters. Materials. 2019;12(12):1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121970
Kumari CM, Bhat KM, Bansal R. Evaluation of surface roughness of different restorative composites after polishing using atomic force microscopy. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(1):56–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173200
Di Fiore A, Stellini E, Alageel O, Alhotan A. Comparison of mechanical and surface properties of two 3D printed composite resins for definitive restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(4):839.e831–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.003
Alfawaz Y. Impact of polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(8):647–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2100
Son J, Lee H. Preliminary study on polishing SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resins for surface roughness and glossiness reduction. Micromachines. 2020;11(9):843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11090843
Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NH, Blum IR. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2018;71:25–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.008
Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins. J Dent. 2017;14(2):69.
Farkas AZ, Galatanu S-V, Nagib R. The influence of printing layer thickness and orientation on the mechanical properties of DLP 3D-printed dental resin. Polymers. 2023;15(5):1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051113
Piedra-Cascón W, Krishnamurthy VR, Att W, Revilla-León M. 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: a narrative review. J Dent. 2021;109:103630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103630
Grzebieluch W, Kowalewski P, Grygier D, Rutkowska-Gorczyca M, Kozakiewicz M, Jurczyszyn K. Printable and machinable dental restorative composites for CAD/CAM application – comparison of mechanical properties, fractographic, texture and fractal dimension analysis. Materials. 2021;14(17):4919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174919
Bora PV, Sayed Ahmed A, Alford A, Pitttman K, Thomas V, Lawson NC. Characterization of materials used for 3D printing dental crowns and hybrid prostheses. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(1):220–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13174
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049:2000. Dentistry—Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. Geneva: ISO; 2000. 27 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Merve Arıkan, Serdar Akarsu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
