Surface roughness of contemporary resin composites after exposure to energy drinks

Authors

  • Jhonatan Vilca-Mayta School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Privada de Tacna, Tacna, Peru
  • José Giancarlo Tozo-Burgos Research Group on Dental Biomaterials and Natural Products, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Privada de Tacna, Tacna, Peru
  • Marco Sánchez-Tito Research Group on Dental Biomaterials and Natural Products, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Privada de Tacna, Tacna, Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46583

Keywords:

Energy drinks, resin composites, surface roughness, erosive degradation, citric acid, restorative materials

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three energy drinks (Red Bull®, Volt®, and 360 Energy Drink®) on the surface roughness of three contemporary resin composites: Filtek Z350 XT, PALFIQUE LX5, and Vittra APS.

Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental design was conducted with 108 resin specimens (n = 12 per group). After polishing, baseline roughness (Ra, µm) was measured using a profilometer. Specimens were immersed in one of the three beverages for 1 and 7 days, with daily renewal. Roughness was recorded at T₀, T₁, and T₂. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with Sidak-adjusted post hoc comparisons (α = 0.05).

Results: All resins composites exhibited a progressive increase in Ra from T₀ to T₂. Filtek Z350 XT showed the greatest resistance to surface degradation, while PALFIQUE LX5 and Vittra APS were more susceptible. Red Bull® and 360 Energy Drink® induced greater roughness increases than Volt® (p < 0.05). Although most roughness values remained at or near the clinically accepted threshold of Ra ≤ 0.2 µm, a slight increase above this threshold was observed for PALFIQUE LX5 exposed to 360 Energy Drink® at T₂. A significant resin × time interaction (p = 0.034) indicated that degradation patterns depended on composite type.

Conclusion: Energy drinks promoted measurable increases in the surface roughness of all evaluated resin composites. Filtek Z350 XT showed greater resistance to roughness changes, whereas PALFIQUE LX5 and Vittra APS demonstrated higher susceptibility to acidic degradation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abouelmagd DM, Basheer RR. Microhardness evaluation of microhybrid versus nanofilled resin composite after exposure to acidic drinks. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(3):353–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_66_22

Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105(2):97–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x

Xu KY, Baumgartner KT, Shankar S, Huckenpahler A, Glaser PE. Energy drinks: a clinical primer and national data update. Mo Med. 2024;121(6):481–8.

Breda JJ, Whiting SH, Encarnação R, Norberg S, Jones R, Reinap M, et al. Energy drink consumption in Europe: a review of the risks, adverse health effects, and policy options to respond. Front Public Health. 2014;2:134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00134

Grandner MA, Knutson KL, Troxel W, Hale L, Jean-Louis G, Miller KE. Implications of sleep and energy drink use for health disparities. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(Suppl. 1):14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nure.12137

Nadeem IM, Shanmugaraj A, Sakha S, Horner NS, Ayeni OR, Khan M. Energy drinks and their adverse health effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2021;13(3):265–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738120949181

Puupponen M, Tynjälä J, Välimaa R, Paakkari L. Associations between adolescents’ energy drink consumption frequency and several negative health indicators. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15055-6

Li P, Haas NA, Dalla-Pozza R, Jakob A, Oberhoffer FS, Mandilaras G. Energy drinks and adverse health events in children and adolescents: a literature review. Nutrients. 2023;15(11):2537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112537

Naveh G, Mansour B, Bader M, Steckler R, Nasrallah E, Hujeyrat H, et al. Physiological impacts of energy drink consumption: a clinical analysis in adolescents. Nutrients. 2024;16(14):2328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142328

von Fraunhofer JA, Rogers MM. Effects of sports drinks and other beverages on dental enamel. Gen Dent. 2005;53(1):28–31.

Kose HD, Giray I, Boyacioglu H, Turkun LS. Can energy drinks affect the surface quality of bioactive restorative materials? BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04781-x

Al-Samadani KH. Effect of energy drinks on the surface texture of nanoflled composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(5):830–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1411

Kolarovszki B, Sándor A, Szabó P, Kopniczky J, Frank D, Nagy Á, et al. Energy drinks alter the surface morphology and roughness of composites, fissure sealants and titanium: an in vitro study. Heliyon. 2022;8(9):e10764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10764

Barve D, Dave PN, Gulve MN, Meera Sahib MA, Naz F, Shahabe SA. Effect of commonly consumed beverages on microhardness of two types of composites. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(6):663–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1854

Bengal S, Badole GP, Shenoi PR, Kubde R, Shahu S. Evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of bulk-fill and nanohybrid composite after exposure to different beverages at various time intervals – an in vitro study. Ann Afr Med. 2024;23(3):466–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_157_23

Pietrokovski Y, Zeituni D, Schwartz A, Beyth N. Comparison of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of resin composite. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(21):7415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217415

Sánchez-Tito M, Tay LY. Effect of the addition of silver nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of an orthodontic adhesive. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36(2):359–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.021

Peker O, Bolgul B. Evaluation of surface roughness and color changes of restorative materials used with different polishing procedures in pediatric dentistry. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47(4):72–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2565762/v1

Aref NS, Abdallah RM. Surface analysis and spectrophotometric evaluation of different esthetic restorative materials frequently exposed to a desensitizing agent. Int J Biomater. 2021;2021:9989747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9989747

Alshehri A, Alhalabi F, Mustafa M, Awad MM, Alqhtani M, Almutairi M, et al. Effects of accelerated aging on color stability and surface roughness of a biomimetic composite: an in vitro study. Biomimetics (Basel). 2022;7(4):158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7040158

Alrahlah A, Khan R, Al-Odayni AB, Saeed WS, Bautista LS, Alnofaiy IA, et al. Advancing dimethacrylate dental composites by synergy of pre-polymerized TEGDMA co-filler: a physio-mechanical evaluation. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023;8(8):577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8080577

Tapety CM, Carneiro YK, Chagas YM, Souza LC, Souza NO, Valadas LA. Degree of conversion and mechanical properties of a commercial composite with an advanced polymerization system. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2023;36(2):112–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.36/2/112

Basílio M, Gregorio R, Câmara JV, Serrano L, Campos PR, Pierote JJ, et al. Influence of different photoinitiators on the resistance of union in bovine dentin: experimental and microscopic study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(2):e132–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57756

Kumari CM, Bhat KM, Bansal R, Singh N, Anupama A, Lavanya T. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of newer nanoposterior composite resins after immersion in food-simulating liquids. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10(2):289–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_535_18

Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Amiri Daneshvar F, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(1):9–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.002

Loo-Valle J, Aguilar Gálvez D, Arriola-Guillén LE. Effect of energy drinks on the surface microhardness of bulk fill resins. In vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(2):e131–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61896

Published

2026-08-04

How to Cite

Vilca-Mayta, J., Tozo-Burgos, J. G., & Sánchez-Tito, M. (2026). Surface roughness of contemporary resin composites after exposure to energy drinks. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 13(1), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46583