Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated PMMA, PEEK, and PEKK three-unit provisional fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46737Keywords:
Marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, CAD/CAM, provisional, fixed dental prostheses, PMMA, PEEK, PEKKAbstract
Background: Although polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is widely used for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) provisional restorations, high-performance polymers such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) have been proposed as alternatives. However, limited data are available comparing these materials in multi-unit provisional fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated three-unit provisional FDPs constructed from PMMA, PEEK, and PEKK.
Materials and Methods: A total of 48 sound human maxillary teeth (24 second premolars and 24 second molars) were prepared to receive 24 CAD/CAM-fabricated three-unit provisional FDPs. Specimens were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 8) according to material: PMMA, PEEK, and PEKK. Marginal adaptation was initially measured before cementation using a stereomicroscope. Following cementation, all specimens underwent standardized thermomechanical aging (10,000 thermal cycles and 240,000 mechanical loading cycles), after which marginal adaptation was reevaluated. Fracture resistance was then assessed using a universal testing machine, followed by analysis with scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and Fisher’s exact test (P ≤ 0.05).
Results: Following cementation and aging, PMMA showed significantly lower marginal discrepancy than PEEK and PEKK (P < 0.001). PEEK exhibited a significant improvement in marginal adaptation after thermomechanical aging (P = 0.002), whereas PMMA and PEKK showed no significant changes. Fracture resistance differed significantly among groups (P < 0.001), with PEKK recording the highest mean fracture load (2,669 ± 204 N), followed by PEEK (1,849 ± 183 N), while PMMA showed the lowest mean value (1,072 ± 127 N).
Conclusions: Under the tested experimental conditions, material type significantly affected both marginal adaptation and fracture resistance. Among the tested materials, PMMA demonstrated the lowest marginal discrepancy, and PEKK exhibited the highest fracture resistance, whereas PEEK provided a balanced performance.
Downloads
References
Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(5): 474–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
Aldegheishem A, Ioannidis G, Att W, Petridis H. Success and survival of various types of all-ceramic single crowns: a critical review and analysis of studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years or longer. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(2):168–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4703
Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3): 649–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012
Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA. Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(2):225–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121406
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
Amalorpavam V, Sreelal T, Chandramohan G, Jithin GN, Ponjayanthi, Kamalashankar. Comparison of marginal fit and internal adaptation of copings fabricated with polyetheretherketone and zirconia – an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(2):1199–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_328_21
Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(6):743–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002
Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):7–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-345
Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The Use of a modified poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(7):580–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12325
Hasanzade M, Yaghoobi N, Nematollahi P, Ghazanfari R. Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023;9(5):832–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.758
Shams A, Sakrana AA, Abo El-Farag SA, Özcan M. Assessment of biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with novel endocrown system. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022;30(1):20–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2244Shams16
Peñate L, Basilio J, Roig M, Mercadé M. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(2):248–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.023
Chandki R, Maru R, Gunwal M, Garg A, Mishra A. A comparison of different methods for disinfection or sterilization of extracted human teeth to be used for dental education purposes. World J Dent. 2013;4(1):29–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1198
Shams A, Abdelshafi MA, Salem MT. Fracture behavior of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with different lithium silicate-based endocrown restorations. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07149-x
Qali M, Alsaegh H, Alsaraf S. Clinical considerations for crown lengthening: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2024;16(11):72934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72934
Nawafleh N, Bibars AR, Elshiyab S, Janzeer Y. In vitro simulation of periodontal ligament in fatigue testing of dental crowns. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(3):380–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713953
AlZahrani F, Richards L. Micro-CT evaluation of a novel periodontal ligament simulation technique for dental experimental models. Arch Orofac Sci. 2018;13(2):93–103.
Hajaj T, Lile IE, Veja I, Titihazan F, Rominu M, Negruțiu ML, et al. Influence of pontic length on the structural integrity of zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs). J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(4):116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16040116
Amalorpavam V, Chandramohan G, Soundar J, Shankar K, Missier MS, Hines AJ. Stereomicroscope-based in vitro study evaluating the marginal and internal fit of PEEK and PEKK crowns. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(2):1404–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_756_23
Moawed ARM, El-Mahllawi O, Hashem RMM. Fracture resistance of interim restoration constructed by 3D printing versus CAD/CAM technique in different oral media (in vitro study). Egypt Dent J. 2024;70(2):1547–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.258131.2848
Abdullah AO, Tsitrou EA, Pollington S. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(3):258–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150451
Elmetwaly ME, Abd El Hamid T, Atta MO. Marginal integrity of temporary bridges constructed by CAD/CAM, three dimensional printer and conventional method. Dent Sci Updates. 2023;4(2):357–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2023.194261.1161
Baran MC, Demirci F, Tuzlalı M. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made using CAD/CAM metal-free materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2022;130(6):12901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12901
Shetty K, Alderea EW, Altaf RW, Suqati EA, Sindi MA. Comparison and evaluation of marginal accuracy of provisional restoration by 3 different materials in vitro study. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2020;9(5):68–76.
Demirci F, Bahce E, Baran MC. Mechanical analysis of three-unit metal-free fixed dental prostheses produced in different materials with CAD/CAM technology. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(9):5969–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04623-6
Güney B, Nalbant AD, Bankoğlu Güngör M. Comparison of the fracture resistance of provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures manufactured with conventional, milling, and 3D-printing techniques. Appl Sci. 2025;15(12):6539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126539
Bhambhu S, Sahni S, Padiyar N, Kaurani P. Comparison of fracture resistance of three-unit provisional fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital methods. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022;12(2):59–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1363
Salagalla UR, Mandava J, Ravi RC, Nunna V. Effect of intratooth location and thermomechanical cycling on microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite resin. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(6):657–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_30_18
Dartora G, Rocha Pereira GK, Varella de Carvalho R, Zucuni CP, Valandro LF, Cesar PF, et al. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;100:103401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103401
Tribst JP, Dal Piva AO, Madruga CF, Valera MC, Bresciani E, Bottino MA, et al. The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CADCAM endocrowns. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):969–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56002
Shams A, Elsherbini M, Elsherbiny AA, Özcan M, Sakrana AA. Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;126:105031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105031
de Oliveira Limírio JPJ, Gomes JML, Alves Rezende MCR, Lemos CAA, Rosa CDDRD, Pellizzer EP. Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: conventional versus CAD-CAM resin – a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(6):1221–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.018
Qin L, Yao S, Zhao J, Zhou C, Oates TW, Weir MD, et al. Review on development and dental applications of polyetheretherketone-based biomaterials and restorations. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(2):408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020408
Zol SM, Alauddin MS, Said Z, Mohd Ghazali MI, Hao-Ern L, Mohd Farid DA, et al. Description of poly(aryl-ether-ketone) materials (PAEKS), polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) for application as a dental material: a materials science review. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(9):2170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092170
Alabdulkader MA, Habib SR. Effect of cement application techniques on the adaptation and retention of provisional crowns. Technol Health Care. 2018;26(6):945–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-181351
Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
Temizci T, Bozoğulları HN. Effect of thermal cycling on the flexural strength of 3-D printed, CAD/CAM milled and heat-polymerized denture base materials. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04122-y
Jalalian E, Younesi F, Golalipour S, Khorshidi S, Mahdavisaedabadi SH, Sayyari M. Assessment of marginal and internal adaptation in provisional crowns utilizing three distinct materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023;24(11):853–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3589
Mendes JM, Botelho PC, Mendes J, Barreiros P, Aroso C, Silva AS. Comparison of fracture strengths of three provisional prosthodontic CAD/CAM materials: laboratory fatigue tests. Appl Sci. 2021;11(20):9589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209589
Elgohary N, Abdelshafi M, Shams A. Influence of repeated firings on the optical properties of zirconia ceramic core with different thicknesses of veneering ceramic: an in vitro study. Egypt Dent J. 2024;70(4):3657–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.309952.3150
Shams A, Elgohary N. Impact of artificial aging on the color stability and translucency of ceramic laminate veneers using different glass and hybrid ceramic materials. Biomater Investig Dent. 2026;13:287–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.45798
Wang B, Huang M, Dang P, Xie J, Zhang X, Yan X. PEEK in fixed dental prostheses: application and adhesion improvement. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(12):2323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122323
Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G. Using modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: a short-term clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):335–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.009
Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller WD. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1377–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.151
Mangtani V, Sonkesriya S, Gupta A, Chansoria H, Tripathi A, Gupta S. Fracture resistance of direct versus CAD-CAM PMMA provisional restorations: an in vitro study. Bioinformation. 2025;21(9):3395–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300213395
Astudillo-Rubio D, Delgado-Gaete A, Bellot-Arcís C, Montiel-Company JM, Pascual-Moscardó A, Almerich-Silla JM. Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193162
Visuttiwattanakorn S, Suthamwat A, Urapepon S, Kiattavorncharoen S. Reliability of polyetherketoneketone as definitive implant-supported bridges in the posterior region – an in vitro study of the ultimate fracture load and vertical marginal discrepancy after artificial aging. Appl Sci. 2022;12(22):11454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211454
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mustafa Mohammad Harfi, Shaimaa Ahmed Abo El-Farag, Ahmed Shams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry is a Diamond Open Access peer-reviewed journal, publishing research in oral biomaterials science. The publishing of articles is free for authors, thanks to the support of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Society (AOSS), a not-for-profit society. 
