Effect of a silicon carbide bur on shear bond strength between resin cement and zirconia

Authors

  • Khalil Aburawa Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Kamel Al Hijazi Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Christel Larsson Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
  • Martin Janda Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Chulalongkorn University Implant and Esthetic Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46767

Keywords:

Zirconia, adhesive resin cement, silicon carbide bur, shear bond strength, airborne-particle abrasion

Abstract

Purpose: This in-vitro pilot study aimed to investigate the effect of a silicon carbide grinding bur on the shear bond strength (SBS) between zirconia and 10-MDP-containing cement.

Materials and methods: Thirty zirconia specimens were prepared and randomly assigned to three groups based on surface pretreatment: airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (APA), treatment with a silicon carbide grinding bur (SiC bur), and airborne-particle abrasion followed by silicon carbide bur treatment (APA + SiC bur). All specimens were bonded with an adhesive resin cement (PANAVIA V5), aged with 5,000 thermocycles, and subjected to an SBS test. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Fracture modes were assessed.

Results: The APA group showed significantly higher SBS than the SiC bur and APA + SiC bur groups (p < 0.001). The APA + SiC bur group showed a higher mean SBS than the SiC bur group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Silicon carbide bur treatment did not have a beneficial effect on SBS after 5,000 thermocycles. Airborne-particle abrasion resulted in significantly higher SBS than silicon carbide bur treatment alone or airborne-particle abrasion followed by silicon carbide bur treatment.

Clinical relevance: Under the tested conditions, the silicon carbide bur cannot be recommended as an alternative or an adjunct to airborne-particle abrasion for improving zirconia-resin cement bonding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Feitosa VP, Tamada Y, Irie M, Yoshida Y, et al. Chemical interaction mechanism of 10-MDP with zirconia. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45563

Chatterjee N, Ghosh A. Current scenario on adhesion to zirconia; surface pretreatments and resin cements: a systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022;22(1):13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_478_21

Lundberg K, Wu L, Papia E. The effect of grinding and/or airborne-­particle abrasion on the bond strength between zirconia and veneering porcelain: a systematic review. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3(1):8–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1293486

Martins FV, Vasques WF, Guyatt GH, Fonseca EM. Effect of aluminum oxide airborne-particle abrasion on zirconia bond strength to tooth or composite resin substrates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2026;135(2):278.e1–e16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.09.020

Rekow ED, Silva NRFA, Coelho PG, Zhang Y, Guess P, Thompson VP. Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements. J Dent Res. 2011;90(8):937–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510391795

Li X, Liang S, Inokoshi M, Zhao S, Hong G, Yao C, et al. Different surface treatments and adhesive monomers for zirconia-resin bonds: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024;60:175–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.05.004

Kirmali O, Kapdan A, Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Ozarslan MM. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(1):28–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.946963

Kocaağaoğlu H, Manav T, Albayrak H. In vitro comparison of the bond strength between ceramic repair systems and ceramic materials and evaluation of the wettability. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(3):238–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12381

Janda M, Papia E, Larsson C. Shear bond strength of five different repair systems to three different ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2025;38(6):695–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9179

Le M, Larsson C, Papia E. Bond strength between MDP-based cement and translucent zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(3):480–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-194

VOCO GmbH. Cimara: instructions for use. Cuxhaven: VOCO GmbH; 2016.

Baldissara P, Querzè M, Monaco C, Scotti R, Fonseca RG. Efficacy of surface treatments on the bond strength of resin cements to two brands of zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(3):259–67.

Kirmali O, Barutcigil Ç, Ozarslan MM, Barutcigil K, Harorlı OT. Repair bond strength of composite resin to sandblasted and laser irradiated Y-TZP ceramic surfaces. Scanning. 2015;37(3):186–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21197

Libecki W, Elsayed A, Lehmann F, Kern M. Efficacy of different surface treatments for intraoral repair of veneered zirconia frameworks. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(4):323–9.

Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148

Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Teixeira EC, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Fatigue bond strength of dental adhesive systems: historical background of test methodology, clinical considerations and future perspectives. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:193–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2022.05.001

Abdulla MA, Hasan RH. Shear bond strength of two repair systems to zirconia ceramic by different surface treatments. J Lasers Med Sci. 2022;13:e31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2022.31

Çınar S, Kırmalı O. Repair bond strength of composite resin to zirconia restorations after different thermal cycles. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(5):297–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.297

Bömicke W, Schürz A, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Rues S. Durability of resin-zirconia bonds produced using methods available in dental practice. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):17–27.

Kim JH, Chae S, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Comparison of shear test methods for evaluating the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):745–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.903516

Lopes GRS, Ramos NC, Grangeiro MTV, Matos JDM, Bottino MA, Özcan M, et al. Adhesion between zirconia and resin cement: a critical evaluation of testing methodologies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;120:104547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104547

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Aburawa, K., Al Hijazi, K., Larsson, C., & Janda, M. (2026). Effect of a silicon carbide bur on shear bond strength between resin cement and zirconia. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 13(1), 703–709. https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46767