Physical activity and sedentary behaviour changes during and after cardiac rehabilitation: Can patients be clustered?

Authors

  • Marlou M. Limpens Department of Epidemiology
  • Rita J. G van den Berg Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Iris Den Uijl Department of Rehabilitation Medicine; Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation, Rotterdam
  • Madoka Sunamura Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation, Rotterdam
  • Trudy Voortman Department of Epidemiology; Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • Eric Boersma Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam
  • Nienke ter Hoeve Department of Rehabilitation Medicine; Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation, Rotterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.4343

Keywords:

Acute coronary syndrome, Sedentary behaviour, Physical activity, Step count, Cardiac rehabilitation, Latent class trajectory modelling

Abstract

Objective: To identify clusters of patients according to changes in their physical behaviour during and after cardiac rehabilitation, and to predict cluster membership.
Methods: The study included 533 patients (mean age 57.9 years; 18.2% females) with a recent acute coronary syndrome who participated in a 12-week multi-disciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme, within a cohort study design. Physical behaviour (light physical activity, moderate-to vigorous physical activity, step count, and sedentary behaviour) was measured using accelerometry at 4 timepoints. To identify clusters of patients according to changes in physical behaviour during and after cardiac rehabilitation, latent class trajectory modelling was applied. Baseline factors to predict cluster membership were assessed using multinomial logistic regression.
Results: During and after cardiac rehabilitation, 3 separate clusters were identified for all 4 physical behaviour outcomes: patients with steady levels (comprising 68–83% of the patients), and improving (6–21%) or deteriorating (4–23%) levels. Main predictor for membership to a specific cluster was baseline physical behaviour. Patients with higher starting physical behaviour were more likely to be a member of clusters with deteriorating levels.
Conclusion: Separate clusters of physical behaviour changes during and after cardiac rehabilitation could be identified. Clusters were mainly distinguished by baseline physical behaviour level.

LAY ABSTRACT
Physical behaviour is a construct including both physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Healthy levels of physical behaviour are important for cardiac patients. Cardiac rehabilitation programs are designed to promote a heart-healthy lifestyle for this group. Nevertheless, not all patients perform sufficient physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation. It is important to identify patients at risk for disappointing physical behaviour outcomes at an early stage to provide additional care. Outcomes of the current study show that cardiac patients can be clustered according to their change in physical behavior during and after cardiac rehabilitation. The majority showed steady levels and no improvements, but we could also identify groups of patients with improving and deteriorating levels. Patients with higher starting physical activity levels or low sedentary behaviour levels were more likely to be a member of clusters with deteriorating levels. These patients could benefit of additional interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bussmann JB, van den Berg-Emons RJ. To total amount of activity..... and beyond: perspectives on measuring physical behavior. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00463

Giannuzzi P, Mezzani A, Saner H, Bjornstad H, Fioretti P, Mendes M, et al. Physical activity for primary and secondary prevention. Position paper of the Working Group on Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Cardiovasc Prevent Rehab 2003; 10: 319–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000086303.28200.50

Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, Bittner V, Comoss P, Foody JM, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2007; 115: 2675–2682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180945

Al-Khalili F, Janszky I, Andersson A, Svane B, Schenck-Gustafsson K. Physical activity and exercise performance predict long-term prognosis in middle-aged women surviving acute coronary syndrome. J Intern Med 2007; 261: 178–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01755.x

Dibben GO, Dalal HM, Taylor RS, Doherty P, Tang LH, Hillsdon M. Cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2018; 104: 1394–1402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312832

Meiring RM, Tanimukai K, Bradnam L. The effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 11: 2150132720935290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132720935290

Blanchard CM, Giacomantonio N, Lyons R, Cyr C, Rhodes RE, Reid RD, et al. Examining the steps-per-day trajectories of cardiac rehabilitation patients – a latent class growth analysis perspective. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2014; 34: 106–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000031

Ter Hoeve N, Sunamura M, Stam HJ, Boersma E, Geleijnse ML, van Domburg RT, et al. Effects of two behavioral cardiac rehabilitation interventions on physical activity: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Cardiol 2018; 255: 221–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.015

Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons HJ, Haverkamp M, Redekop K, Geleijnse ML, et al. OPTImal CArdiac REhabilitation (OPTICARE) following Acute Coronary Syndromes: Rationale and design of a randomised, controlled trial to investigate the benefits of expanded educational and behavioural intervention programs. Neth Heart J 2013; 21: 324–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-013-0422-y

PAAHR RNNep. Multidisciplinary guidelines cardiac rehabilitation 2011. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Cardiologie; 2011.

Ter Hoeve N, Sunamura M, van Geffen ME, Fanchamps MH, Horemans HL, Bussmann JB, et al. Changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior during cardiac rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98: 2378–2384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.008

Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 2011; 14: 411–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003

Carr LJ, Mahar MT. Accuracy of intensity and inclinometer output of three activity monitors for identification of sedentary behavior and light-intensity activity. J Obes 2012; 2012: 460271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/460271

Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospial Anxiety and Depression Scale, an update literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52: 69–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3

Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, et al. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehab Res 2007; 30: 81–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4

Valko PO, Vassetti CL, Bloch KE, Held U, Baumann CR. Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Swiss Cohort. Sleep 2008; 31: 1601–1607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/31.11.1601

Zotti AM, Balestroni G, Cerutti P, Ferrario SR, Angelino E, Miglioretti M. Application of the general perceived self-efficacy scale in cardiovascular rehabilitation. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2007; 68: 178–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2007.451

Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Geleijnse ML, Haverkamp M, Stam HJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Heart 2018; 104: 430–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311681

Nguena Nguefack HL, Page MG, Katz J, Choiniere M, Vanasse A, Dorais M, et al. Trajectory modelling techniques useful to epidemiological research: a comparative narrative review of approaches. Clin Epidemiol 2020; 12: 1205–1222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S265287

Lennon H, Kelly S, Sperrin M, Buchan I, Cross AJ, Leitzmann M, et al. Framework to construct and interpret latent class trajectory modelling. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e020683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020683

Klijn SL, Weijenberg MP, Lemmens P, van den Brandt PA, Lima Passos V. Introducing the fit-criteria assessment plot – a visualisation tool to assist class enumeration in group-based trajectory modelling. Stat Methods Med Res 2017; 26: 2424–2436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280215598665

Ter Hoeve N, Huisstede BMA, Stam HJ, Van Domburg RT, Sunamura M, van den Berg-Emons HJG. Does cardiac rehabilitation after an acute cardiac syndrome lead to changes in physical activity habits? Systematic review. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 167–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130509

Sweet SN, Tulloch H, Fortier MS, Pipe AL, Reid RD. Patterns of motivation and ongoing exercise activity in cardiac rehabilitation settings: a 24-month exploration from the TEACH Study. Ann Behav Med 2011; 42: 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9264-2

Linden A. Assessing regression to the mean effects in health care initiatives. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-119

Nooijen CFJ, Moller J, Forsell Y, Ekblom M, Galanti MR, Engstrom K. Do unfavourable alcohol, smoking, nutrition and physical activity predict sustained leisure time sedentary behaviour? A population-based cohort study. Prev Med 2017; 101: 23–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.019

Published

2023-07-12

How to Cite

Limpens, M. M., van den Berg, R. J. G., Den Uijl, I., Sunamura, M., Voortman, T., Boersma, E., & ter Hoeve, N. (2023). Physical activity and sedentary behaviour changes during and after cardiac rehabilitation: Can patients be clustered?. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 55, jrm4343. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.4343

Issue

Section

Original Report

Categories