Latent profile analysis of social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a mixed-methods study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.44832Keywords:
stroke, social participation, latent profile analysis, mixed-methods study, limb dysfunctionAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify profiles of social participation among stroke survivors with limb dysfunction and explore the factors influencing these profiles.
Design: A convergent mixed-methods design.
Methods: The quantitative phase involved 499 participants recruited from 5 neurorehabilitation centres in Shanghai between December 2023 and June 2025. Participants completed measures including the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Qualitative semi-structured interviews were performed with 16 participants to explore lived experiences of social participation.
Results: Latent profile analysis revealed 4 distinct social participation profiles: “Active Integration”, “Contented Conservatism”, “Cautious Conservatism”, and “Alienated Disengagement”. A multivariate analysis identified age, resilience, and physical function as significant predictors of profile membership. Qualitative findings uncovered 2 core emotional experiences (a sense of loss vs a sense of rebuilding) and 3 behavioural patterns (activist, conservative, alienated), which effectively explained the quantitative profiles’ characteristics and their underlying mechanisms. The integration of data provided a nuanced person-centred framework depicting the heterogeneity in post-stroke social participation.
Conclusion: Social participation among stroke survivors is heterogeneous and can be classified into 4 distinct profiles shaped by the interplay of physical function, resilience, and sociodemographic factors. The findings underscore the necessity of implementing profile-specific, stepped-care interventions for effectively enhancing post-stroke social participation.
Downloads
References
Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins SO, Pandian J, Lindsay P, et al. World Stroke Organization: Global stroke fact sheet 2025. Int J Stroke 2025; 20: 132–144.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241308142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241308142
Tu WJ, Wang LD; Special Writing Group of China Stroke Surveillance Report. China stroke surveillance report 2021. Mil Med Res 2023; 10: 33.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00463-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00463-x
Kumar S, Chou SH, Smith CJ, Nallaparaju A, Laurido-Soto OJ, Leonard AD, et al. Addressing systemic complications of acute stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2025; 56: e15–e29.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000477
Woodman P, Riazi A, Pereira C, Jones F. Social participation post stroke: a meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 2031–2043.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.887796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.887796
Norlander A, Iwarsson S, Jönsson A, Lindgren A, Lexell E. Participation in social and leisure activities while re-constructing the self: understanding strategies used by stroke survivors from a long-term perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 4284–4292.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1900418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1900418
Yan J, Wang Y, Zhang L, Chen P, Yang N, Zhang H. Social participation of stroke patients: a bibliometric analysis. Front Neurol 2025; 16: 1616861.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1616861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1616861
de Souza F, Sales M, Laporte L, Melo A, da Silva Ribeiro N. Discharge outcomes as predictors of social participation in the community after a stroke: a cohort study. Int J Rehabil Res 2023; 46: 325–330.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000599
Wan X, Chan DNS, Chau JPC, Zhang Y, Gu Z, Xu L. Social participation challenges and facilitators among Chinese stroke survivors: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Public Health 2025; 25: 468.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21592-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21592-z
Vecchia CD, Préau M, Haesebaert J, Viprey M, Rode G, Termoz A, et al. Factors associated with post-stroke social participation: a quantitative study based on the ICF framework. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2023; 66: 101686.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101686
Gingrich N, Bosancich J, Schmidt J, Sakakibara BM. Capability, opportunity, motivation, and social participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2023; 30: 423–435.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2022.2070358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2022.2070358
Foley EL, Nicholas ML, Baum CM, Connor LT. Influence of environmental factors on social participation post-stroke. Behav Neurol 2019; 2019: 2606039.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2606039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2606039
Zhou X, Du M, Dai X, Zhu S, Zhou L, Li X. Intervention patterns and preliminary effectiveness on social participation following stroke: a scoping review. BMC Neurol 2023; 23: 275.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03250-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03250-2
Zhang Q, Schwade M, Smith Y, Wood R, Young L. Exercise-based interventions for post-stroke social participation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 111: 103738.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103738
Qiao X, Wu Z, Ren Y, Li Y. Effectiveness of the Dyadic Coping Intervention of Social Participation (DCISP) for stroke survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol 2024; 12: 500.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01994-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01994-1
Xue M, Wang Q, Wang J, Ge S, Zhang Z, Mei Y. E-health literacy in stroke patients: latent profile analysis and influencing factors. J Adv Nurs 2025; 81: 1388–1398.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16351
Lin S, Wang C, Wang Q, Xie S, Tu Q, Zhang H, et al. The experience of stroke survivors and caregivers during hospital-to-home transitional care: a qualitative longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 130: 104213.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104213
Tovin MM, Wormley ME. Systematic development of standards for mixed methods reporting in rehabilitation health sciences research. Phys Ther 2023; 103: pzad084.
Ferguson SL, EWG Moore, DM Hull. Finding latent groups in observed data: a primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. Int J Behav Dev 2020; 44: 458–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419881721
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad084
van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VPM, Visser-Meily JMA, et al. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 752–757.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0589
de Graaf JA, Volkers EJ, Schepers VPM, Visser-Meily JMA, Post MWM. Validity of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation restrictions scale in a hospital based stroke population 3 months after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2022; 29: 516–525.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2021.1956047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2021.1956047
Zhang ZY. The translation and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) in a Chinese context. Master’s thesis, Soochow University; 2016.
Yu X, Zhang J. Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people. Soc Behav Pers 2007; 35: 19–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1219-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1219-0
Yu XN, Lau JT, Mak WW, Zhang J, Lui WWS, Zhang J. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale among Chinese adolescents. Compr Psychiatry 2011; 52: 218–224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.05.010
Wu Z, Liu Y, Li X, Li X. Resilience and associated factors among mainland Chinese women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0167976.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167976
Fan Yuhua, Ji Xiaoyun, Lan Linfang. Application of the modified Rankin Scale in efficacy assessment of domestic stroke clinical trials. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis 2015; 7: 412–415.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2015.07.006
Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1978, p. 48–71.
Wheeler SC, Bechler CJ. Objects and self-identity. Curr Opin Psychol 2021; 39: 6–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.013
Gu T, Cheng Z, Zhang Z, Li C, Ni Y, Wang X. Formation mechanism of contributors’ self-identity based on social identity in online knowledge communities. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 1046525.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046525
Gerber JP, Wheeler L, Suls J. A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychol Bull 2018; 144: 177–197.
https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127
Zhou X, Du M, Weng Y, Zhou L. Hard return: the development and transformation process of social participation in stroke survivors; a qualitative study and initial theory. Clin Rehabil 2020; 34: 824–836.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520917191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520917191
Ozkan H, Ambler G, Banerjee G, Mitchell JJ, Barbato C, Browning S, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and patterns of patient reported non-motor outcomes six months after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024; 47: 101080.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101080
Bailliard AL, Singsomphone L, Kim N, Li SY, Vutakuri N, Ougui H, et al. Life after stroke: changes in sensory health and the impact on participation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2025; 32: 586–594.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2435659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2435659
Krohn M, Rintala A, Immonen J, Sjögren T. The effectiveness of therapeutic exercise interventions with virtual reality on balance and walking among persons with chronic stroke: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26: e59136.
https://doi.org/10.2196/59136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/59136
Yildiz A, Ahmed I, Mustafaoglu R, Kesiktas FN. Effects of robot-assisted arm training on respiratory muscle strength, activities of daily living, and quality of life in patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract 2024; 40: 2818–2826.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2299727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2299727
Fluet G, Qiu Q, Gross A, Gorin H, Patel J, Merians A. The influence of scaffolding on intrinsic motivation and autonomous adherence to a game-based, sparsely supervised home rehabilitation program for people with upper extremity hemiparesis due to stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2024; 21: 143.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01441-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01441-7
Chang CS, Chen CL, Chen RS, Chen HC, Chen CY, Chung CY, et al. Synergistic efficacy of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on central intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb function in patients with stroke: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2024; 21: 49.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01341-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01341-w
Bollinger RM, Krauss MJ, Somerville EK, Holden BM, Blenden G, Hollingsworth H, et al. Rehabilitation transition program to improve community participation among stroke survivors. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7: e2437758.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37758
Lo SHS, Chau JPC, Lau AYL, Choi KC, Shum EWC, Lee VWY, et al. Virtual multidisciplinary stroke care clinic for community-dwelling stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2023; 54: 2482–2490.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043605
Shi Y, Liang Z, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Dong S, Li J, et al. Latent profiles of psychological resilience in patients with chronic disease and their association with social support and activities of daily living: Title page. BMC Psychol 2025; 13: 792.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03115-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03115-y
Burke A, Davoren MP, Arensman E, Harrington JM. Psychoeducational interventions for people living with chronic communicable disease: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2024; 14: e077007.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077007
Zhou X, Wang Y, Zhou L. Social participation, resilience, and coping tendency in a sample of stroke survivors: a multi-centre cross-sectional study in China. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56: jrm12448.
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.12448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.12448
American Psychology Association Help Center. The road to resilience: what is resilience? [EB/OL]. 2011 [cited 2017 Jan 6]. Available from: http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/roadresilience.aspx
Jeste DV, Alexopoulos GS, Blazer DG, Lavretsky H, Sachdev P, Reynolds CF. Wisdom, resilience, and well-being in later life. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2025; 21: 33–59.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-031855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-031855
Hermans EJ, Hendler T, Kalisch R. Building resilience: the stress response as a driving force for neuroplasticity and adaptation. Biol Psychiatry 2025; 97: 330–338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.016
Chang FH, Lin YN, Liou TH, Ni PS. Predicting trends of community participation after hospital discharge for younger adults after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2023; 66: 101644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101644
Liu Y, Li T, Ding L, Cai ZX, Nie S. A predictive model for social participation of middle-aged and older adult stroke survivors: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Front Public Health 2024; 11: 1271294.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1271294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1271294
Li Y, Zhang W, Ye M, Zhou L. Perceived participation and autonomy post-stroke and associated factors: an explorative cross-sectional study. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77: 1293–1303.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14670
Hoyle M, Meredith P, Ownsworth T, Khan A, Gustafsson L. Associations between participation and personal factors in community-dwelling adults post-stroke. Brain Impair 2023; 24: 456–473.
https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2022.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2022.31
Markle-Reid M, Fisher K, Walker KM, Beauchamp M, Cameron JI, Dayler D, et al. The stroke transitional care intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: a multisite pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23: 687.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04403-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04403-1
Zhang H, Sun S, Ma L, Abudureyimu A, Xiu M, Li K, et al. “Flexible trade-off”: social participation change model among middle-aged and older stroke survivors: a grounded theory study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2025; 80: gbaf09.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf091
de Graaf JA, van Miltenburg S, Wermer MJH, Post MWM, Visser-Meily JMA. Gender differences in participation one year after stroke: exploring biopsychosocial predictors for women and men. Top Stroke Rehabil 2025; 32: 150–160.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2377518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2377518
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xuan Zhou, Ying Wang, Lanshu Zhou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
