Healthcare utilization in patients with spina bifida and bone fractures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45674Keywords:
bone fracture, healthcare utilization, spina bifidaAbstract
Objective: To compare bone fractures and fracture-related healthcare costs in individuals with and without spina bifida (SB).
Design: This is a retrospective observational trial.
Subjects/Patients: California’s Healthcare Access and Information database was utilized to identify all individuals with SB who sought care in California emergency departments, inpatient hospitals, or ambulatory surgery centres between 2005 and 2017.
Methods: Bone fracture encounters and associated healthcare utilization factors were compared among individuals with spina bifida vs individuals without spina bifida, matched 5:1 by birth year.
Results: Between 2005 and 2017, 20,290 individuals with spina bifida sought care in California emergency departments, inpatient hospitals, or ambulatory surgery centres. Compared with 101,450 individuals in the comparison group, those with spina bifida were more likely to seek care for a bone fracture (OR 1.64, p < 0.001) and more likely to sustain repeat fractures (36% vs 26%, p < 0.001). Individuals with spina bifida sustained more bone fractures per capita at each body location studied, with more than double the fractures per capita at the chest (2.0x), foot (2.1x), pelvis (2.4x), leg (2.5x), and vertebrae (2.5x). Individuals with spina bifida spent more cumulative days hospitalized for bone fractures (mean 9.4 vs 7.6, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Individuals with spina bifida were diagnosed with more bone fractures per capita than age-matched persons without spina bifida.
Downloads
References
Young NL, Anselmo LA, Burke TA, McCormick A, Mukherjee S. Youth and young adults with spina bifida: their utilization of physician and hospital services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 466–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.015
Inouye BM, Jiang R, Akazemi MH, Wang HHS, Wolf S, Pomann GM, et al. Hospital and ED charges for spina bifida care in the United States between 2006 and 2014: over $2 billion annually. Disabil Health J 2019; 12: 431–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.007
Quan A, Adams R, Ekmark E, Baum M. Bone mineral density in children with myelomeningocele. Pediatrics 1998; 102: E34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.102.3.e34
Rosenstein BD, Greene WB, Herrington RT, Blum AS. Bone density in myelomeningocele: the effects of ambulatory status and other factors. Dev Med Child Neurol 1987; 29: 486–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1987.tb02508.x
Szalay EA, Cheema A. Children with spina bifida are at risk for low bone density. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 1253–1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1634-8
Normal MD, Mazur AT, Borden S, Gruskin A, Anast C, Baron R, et al. Early diagnosis of juvenile renal osteodystrophy. J Pediatr 1980; 97: 226–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80479-3
Marreiros H. Update on bone fragility in spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehab Med. 2018; 11: 265–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-180555
Löppönen T, Saukkonen AL, Serlo W, Tapanainen P, Ruokonen A, Knip M. Reduced levels of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I and binding protein-3 in patients with shunted hydrocephalus. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 32–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.77.1.32
Rotenstein D, Reigel DH. Growth hormone treatment of children with neural tube defects: results from 6 months to 6 years. J Pediatr 1996; 128: 184–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70387-6
Research Data Request Instructions. HCAI [accessed August 29, 2025]. Available from: https://hcai.ca.gov/data/request-data/research-data-request-information/research-data-request-instructions/
Bureau UC. ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs). Census.gov [accessed January 23, 2024]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/zctas.html
Siddeek MH, Castro C, Goldberg DE, Allen IE, Fernandez AM, Grant R, et al. Increased hospital encounters in individuals with spina bifida compared to the general population: statewide healthcare utilization in California from 1995–2017. Urol Pract 2025; 12: 74–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000700
Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health 2000; 21: 171–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
Vélez-Morell CA, Sadighian MJ, Goldberg D, Allen IE, Fernandez AM, Copp HL, et al. Patients with spina bifida have longer length of hospital stay: statewide health care utilization in California from 1995 to 2017. Urol Pract 2024; 11: 841–848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000632
Dosa NP, Eckrich M, Katz DA, Turk M, Liptak GS. Incidence, prevalence, and characteristics of fractures in children, adolescents, and adults with spina bifida. J Spinal Cord Med 2007; 30: S5–9.
Trinh A, Wong P, Brown J, Hennel S, Ebeling PR, Fuller PJ, Milat F. Fractures in spina bifida from childhood to young adulthood. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28: 399–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3742-0
James CC. Fractures of the lower limbs in spina bifida cystica: a survey of 44 fractures in 122 children. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 1970; Suppl 22: 88+. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1970.tb03009.x
Lock TR, Aronson DD. Fractures in patients who have myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1153–1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971080-00005
Parsch K. Origin and treatment of fractures in spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1991; 1: 298–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1042509
Capossela L, Ferretti S, D'Alonzo S, Di Sarno L, Pansini V, Curatola A, et al. Bone disorders in pediatric chronic kidney disease: a literature review. Biology 2023; 12: 1395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12111395
Chu DI, Balmert LC, Arkin CM, Meyer T, Rosoklija I, Li B, et al. Estimated kidney function in children and young adults with spina bifida: a retrospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38: 1907–1914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24092
Okurowska-Zawada B, Konstantynowicz J, Kułak W, Kaczmarski M, Piotrowska-Jastrzebska J, Sienkiewicz D, Sienkiewicz D, et al. Assessment of risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures in children with meningomyelocele. Adv Med Sci 2009; 54: 247–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10039-009-0039-y
Champs APS, Maia GAG, Oliveira FG, de Melo GCN, Soares MMS. Osteoporosis-related fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study from Brazil. Spinal Cord 2020; 58: 484–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0387-9
Du Y, Zhao LJ, Xu Q, Wu KH, Deng HW. Socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults by race/ethnicity and gender: the Louisiana osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28: 1699–1709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3951-1
Grewal J, Carmichael SL, Song J, Shaw GM. Neural tube defects: an analysis of neighbourhood- and individual-level socio-economic characteristics. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23: 116–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00992.x
Ashe MC, Craven C, Eng JJ, Krassioukov A. Prevention and treatment of bone loss after a spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2007; 13: 123–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1301-123
Boyce AM, Tosi LL, Paul SM. Bisphosphonate treatment for children with disabling conditions. PM&R 2014; 6: 427–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.10.009
Drummond DS, Moreau M, Cruess RL. Post-operative neuropathic fractures in patients with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 1981; 23: 147–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1981.tb02435.x
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adrian M. Fernandez, Than Kyaw, Debbie Goldberg, I. Elaine Allen, Yi Li, Alfredo Fernandez, Hillary Copp, Lindsay A. Hampson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
