Role of Eosinophil Relative Count and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Assessment of Severity of Atopic Dermatitis

Authors

  • Sanae Inokuchi-Sakata
  • Yozo Ishiuji
  • Michie Katsuta
  • Budiman Kharma
  • Ken-ichi Yasuda
  • Mitsutoshi Tominaga
  • Kenji Takamori
  • Yoshimasa Nobeyama Department of Dermatology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 105-8461 Tokyo, Japan
  • Akihiko Asahina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3838

Keywords:

atopic dermatitis, subjective parameters, objective parameters, itch, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, eosinophil relative count

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate the relationship between 2 different types of severity-indicating parameters (i.e. between subjective and objective severity-indicating parametersin patients with atopic dermatitis. The disease severity of 55 patients with atopic dermatitis was assessed using 7 subjective parameters indicating severity, including visual analogue scale for itch, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, 5-D itch scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Eczema Area and Severity Index, body surface area, and Investigator Global Assessment, and 8 objective parameters indicating severity, including eosinophil relative count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine. Five subjective parameters reflecting itch correlated significantly with eosinophil relative count, but not with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. In contrast, 2 subjective parameters, mainly reflecting the degree of inflammation and area of affected regions, correlated significantly with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The eosinophil relative count may correlate with the degree of itch, while the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may correlate with the degree of inflammation and the area of the affected region. The eosinophil relative count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may thus be stand-alone parameters from each other in the assessment of the severity of atopic dermatitis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1483–1494.

Thomsen SF. Atopic dermatitis: natural history, diagnosis, and treatment. ISRN Allergy 2014; 2014: 354250.

Renert-Yuval Y, Guttman-Yassky E. New treatments for atopic dermatitis targeting beyond IL-4/IL-13 cytokines. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 124: 28–35.

Mukai H, Noguchi T, Kamimura K, Nishioka K, Nishiyama S. Significance of elevated serum LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) activity in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol 1990; 17: 477–481.

Jenerowicz D, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Silny W. Peripheral blood eosinophilia in atopic dermatitis. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 2007; 16: 47–52.

Hijnen D, De Bruin-Weller M, Oosting B, Lebre C, De Jong E, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, et al. Serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and cutaneous T cell- attracting chemokine (CTACK) levels in allergic diseases: TARC and CTACK are disease-specific markers for atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113: 334–340.

Wuthrich B. Serum IgE in atopic dermatitis: relationship to severity of cutaneous involvement and course of disease as well as coexistence of atopic respiratory diseases. Clin Allergy 1978; 8: 241–248.

Phan NQ, Blome C, Fritz F, Gerss J, Reich A, Ebata T, et al. Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 502–507.

Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC. The patient-oriented eczema measure: development and initial validation of a new tool for measuring atopic eczema severity from the patients’ perspective. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140: 1513–1519.

Elman S, Hynan LS, Gabriel V, Mayo MJ. The 5-D itch scale: a new measure of pruritus. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 587–593.

Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) – a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19: 210–216.

Leshem YA, Hajar T, Hanifin JM, Simpson EL. What the Eczema Area and Severity Index score tells us about the severity of atopic dermatitis: an interpretability study. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172: 1353–1357.

Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Guttman-Yassky E, King B, Silverberg JI, et al. The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD): The development and reliability testing of a novel clinical outcome measurement instrument for the severity of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 83: 839–846.

Sugarman JL, Fluhr JW, Fowler AJ, Bruckner T, Diepgen TL, Williams ML. The objective severity assessment of atopic dermatitis score: an objective measure using permeability barrier function and stratum corneum hydration with computer-assisted estimates for extent of disease. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139: 1417–1422.

Barbier N, Paul C, Luger T, Allen R, De Prost Y, Papp K, et al. Validation of the Eczema Area and Severity Index for atopic dermatitis in a cohort of 1550 patients from the pimecrolimus cream 1% randomized controlled clinical trials programme. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150: 96–102.

Breuer K, Braeutigam M, Kapp A, Werfel T. Influence of pimecrolimus cream 1% on different morphological signs of eczema in infants with atopic dermatitis. Dermatology 2004; 209: 314–320.

Reich A, Heisig M, Phan NQ, Taneda K, Takamori K, Takeuchi S, et al. Visual analogue scale: evaluation of the instrument for the assessment of pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 497–501.

Reich A, Bozek A, Janiszewska K, Szepietowski JC. 12-item pruritus severity scale: development and validation of new itch severity questionnaire. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 3896423.

Schmitt J, Langan S, Williams HC, European Dermato-Epidemiology N. What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120: 1389–1398.

Patel KR, Singam V, Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Sacotte R, Patel N, et al. Measurement properties of three assessments of burden used in atopic dermatitis in adults. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180: 1083–1089.

Stone SP, Muller SA, Gleich GJ. IgE levels in atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1973; 108: 806–811.

Kataoka Y. Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine as a clinical biomarker in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol 2014; 41: 221–229.

Jiang Y, Ma W. Assessment of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in atopic dermatitis patients. Med Sci Monit 2017; 23: 1340–1346.

Hanifin J, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1980: Suppl 92: 44–47.

Raap M, Rudrich U, Stander S, Gehring M, Kapp A, Raap U. Substance P activates human eosinophils. Exp Dermatol 2015; 24: 557–559.

Pavlovic S, Daniltchenko M, Tobin DJ, Hagen E, Hunt SP, Klapp BF, et al. Further exploring the brain-skin connection: stress worsens dermatitis via substance P-dependent neurogenic inflammation in mice. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128: 434–446.

Raap U, Goltz C, Deneka N, Bruder M, Renz H, Kapp A, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is increased in atopic dermatitis and modulates eosinophil functions compared with that seen in nonatopic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 1268–1275.

Kunsleben N, Rudrich U, Gehring M, Novak N, Kapp A, Raap U. IL-31 Induces chemotaxis, calcium mobilization, release of reactive oxygen species, and CCL26 in eosinophils, which are capable to release IL-31. J Invest Dermatol 2015; 135: 1908–1911.

Cevikbas F, Wang X, Akiyama T, Kempkes C, Savinko T, Antal A, et al. A sensory neuron-expressed IL-31 receptor mediates T helper cell-dependent itch: involvement of TRPV1 and TRPA1. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 133: 448–460.

Feld M, Garcia R, Buddenkotte J, Katayama S, Lewis K, Muirhead G, et al. The pruritus- and TH2-associated cytokine IL-31 promotes growth of sensory nerves. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138: 500–508e24.

Alan S, Tuna S, Turkoglu EB. The relation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume with the presence and severity of Behcet’s syndrome. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2015; 31: 626–631.

Proctor MJ, McMillan DC, Morrison DS, Fletcher CD, Horgan PG, Clarke SJ. A derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 107: 695–699.

Chen J, Hong D, Zhai Y, Shen P. Meta-analysis of associations between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis of gastric cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 122.

Bhat TM, Afari ME, Garcia LA. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in peripheral vascular disease: a review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2016; 14: 871–875.

Angkananard T, Anothaisintawee T, McEvoy M, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 2703518.

Bonaventura A, Montecucco F, Dallegri F, Carbone F, Luscher TF, Camici GG, et al. Novel findings in neutrophil biology and their impact on cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 115: 1266–1285.

Thijs J, Krastev T, Weidinger S, Buckens CF, de Bruin-Weller M, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, et al. Biomarkers for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 15: 453–460.

Chu H, Shin JU, Park CO, Lee H, Lee J, Lee KH. Clinical diversity of atopic dermatitis: a review of 5,000 patients at a single institute. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2017; 9: 158–168.

Additional Files

Published

2021-07-07

How to Cite

Inokuchi-Sakata, S., Ishiuji, Y., Katsuta, M., Kharma, B., Yasuda, K.- ichi, Tominaga, M., Takamori, K., Nobeyama, Y., & Asahina, A. (2021). Role of Eosinophil Relative Count and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Assessment of Severity of Atopic Dermatitis. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 101(7), adv00491. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3838