Fragrance Contact Allergy – A Review Focusing on Patch Testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.40332Keywords:
review, patch test, fragrance mix, colophonium, limonene, linalool, essential oils, terpene, oxidation, TRUE test, IQ chamber, Finn chamber, clinical relevance, cosmetic regulationsAbstract
Fragrance materials are widely used in various types of products in daily life and many of them can be contact sensitizers. Contact allergy to fragrances has been reported to be common worldwide. Unlike other groups of contact allergens such as metals and preservatives, fragrance materials in consumer products can be present as single fragrance chemicals or in the form of mixtures known as natural complex substances. Due to the complexity of the fragrance materials and the high number of fragrance substances known to cause contact sensitization, selecting suitable materials for patch testing is challenging. Emerging fragrance markers have been additionally introduced in different baseline series for screening to enhance the rate of fragrance contact allergy detection. Moreover, there have been continual updates on basic knowledge, clinical perspectives, sources of exposure, and regulations on the use of fragrance materials. Avoiding pitfalls while performing patch testing with fragrance test materials is also crucial and should not be overlooked. Therefore, this review aims to update knowledge to provide a high-quality holistic approach to fragrance contact allergy diagnosis and management.
Downloads
References
Stepanyuk A, Kirschning A. Synthetic terpenoids in the world of fragrances: Iso E Super((R)) is the showcase. Beilstein J Org Chem 2019; 15: 2590-2602.
https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.252
Goossens A. Contact-allergic reactions to cosmetics. J Allergy (Cairo) 2011; 2011: 467071.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/467071
de Groot AC. Fragrances: contact allergy and other adverse effects. Dermatitis 2020; 31: 13-35.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000463
Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services. Subchapter G: Cosmetics, 21 C.F.R. Sect. 700.3 (1981).
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. Opinion on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. SCCS/1459/11 2012. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_102.pdf.
Api AM, Belsito D, Biserta S, Botelho D, Bruze M, Burton GA Jr, et al. RIFM low-exposure fragrance ingredients safety assessment. Food Chem Toxicol 2021; 149: 111981.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.111981
Mattoli L, Pelucchini C, Fiordelli V, Burico M, Gianni M, Zambaldi I. Natural complex substances: from molecules to the molecular complexes. Analytical and technological advances for their definition and differentiation from the corresponding synthetic substances. Phytochemistry 2023; 215: 113790.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113790
Aptula AO, Roberts DW, Pease CK. Haptens, prohaptens and prehaptens, or electrophiles and proelectrophiles. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56: 54-56.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.00944.x
Karlberg AT, Börje A, Duus Johansen J, Lidén C, Rastogi S, Roberts D, et al. Activation of non-sensitizing or low-sensitizing fragrance substances into potent sensitizers: prehaptens and prohaptens. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 69: 323-334.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12127
Hagvall L, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Ryberg K, et al. Contact allergy to citral and its constituents geranial and neral, coupled with reactions to the prehapten and prohapten geraniol. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 82: 31-38.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13404
Hagvall L, Backtorp C, Svensson S, Nyman G, Borje A, Karlberg AT. Fragrance compound geraniol forms contact allergens on air exposure: identification and quantification of oxidation products and effect on skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 2007; 20: 807-814.
https://doi.org/10.1021/tx700017v
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing: recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73: 195-221.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12432
Fregert S. Manual of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1981.
de Groot AC. Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru): a critical review of the literature and assessment of the significance of positive patch test reactions and the usefulness of restrictive diets. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 80: 335-353.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13263
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 319-329.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14167
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Antelmi A, Boonchai W, Dahlin J, et al. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes: an update from southern Sweden. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 86: 514-523.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14072
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Antelmi A, Bergendorff O, Björk J, et al. Contact allergy to oxidized linalool and oxidized limonene: patch testing in consecutive patients with dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 86: 15-24.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13980
Silverberg JI, Hou A, Warshaw EM, DeKoven JG, Maibach HI, Belsito DV, et al. Age-related differences in patch testing results among children: analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2018. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 86: 818-826.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.030
Sánchez-Pujol MJ, Docampo-Simón A, Mercader P, González-Pérez R, Hervella-Garcés M, Sanz-Sánchez T, et al. Frequency of sensitization to the individual fragrances of fragrance mix I and II according to the factors included in the MOAHLFA index. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 84: 395-406.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13801
Isaksson M, Ale I, Andersen K, Diepgen T, Elsner P, Goossens A, et al. Multicenter patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatitis 2015; 26: 230-234.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000137
Bruze M. Simultaneous reactions to phenol-formaldehyde resins colophony/hydroabietyl alcohol and balsam of Peru/perfume mixture. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14: 119-120.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01178.x
Andernord D, Bruze M, Bryngelsson IL, Bråred Christensson J, Glas B, Hagvall L, et al. Contact allergy to haptens in the Swedish baseline series: results from the Swedish Patch Test Register (2010 to 2017). Contact Dermatitis 2022; 86: 175-188.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13996
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 of 26 amending Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards labelling of fragrance allergens in cosmetic products, 26 July 2023. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32023R1545.
Larsen WG. Perfume dermatitis: a study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977; 113: 623-626.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1977.01640050083012
Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 237-238.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb04673.x
Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch testing with fragrance-mix and its constituents: discrepancies are largely due to the presence or absence of sorbitan sesquioleate. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 238-239.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01714.x
Johansen JD, Menné T. The fragrance mix and its constituents: a 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 18-23.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00834.x
Bruze M, Andersen KE, Goossens A. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 129-133.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01292.x
Isaksson M, Inerot A, Liden C, Lindberg M, Matura M, Moller H, et al. Multicentre patch testing with fragrance mix II and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 187-189.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12156
Bruze M, Svedman C, Andersen KE, Bruynzeel D, Goossens A, Johansen JD, et al. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 66: 131-136.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02037.x
Bennike NH, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Non-mix fragrances are top sensitizers in consecutive dermatitis patients: a cross-sectional study of the 26 EU-labelled fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 77: 270-279.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12822
Vejanurug P, Tresukosol P, Sajjachareonpong P, Puangpet P. Fragrance allergy could be missed without patch testing with 26 individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 230-235.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12522
Skold M, Borje A, Matura M, Karlberg AT. Studies on the autoxidation and sensitizing capacity of the fragrance chemical linalool, identifying a linalool hydroperoxide. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 46: 267-272.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460504.x
Api AM, Belsito D, Botelho D, Bruze M, Burton GA, Jr., Buschmann J, et al. Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, linalool, CAS Registry number 78-70-6. Food Chem Toxicol 2022; 159: 112687.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112687
Letizia CS, Cocchiara J, Lalko J, Api AM. Fragrance material review on linalool. Food Chem Toxicol 2003; 41: 943-964.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00015-2
Skold M, Borje A, Harambasic E, Karlberg AT. Contact allergens formed on air exposure of linalool. Identification and quantification of primary and secondary oxidation products and the effect on skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 2004; 17: 1697-1705.
https://doi.org/10.1021/tx049831z
de Groot A. Limonene hydroperoxides. Dermatitis 2019; 30: 331-335.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000465
Vieira AJ, Beserra FP, Souza MC, Totti BM, Rozza AL. Limonene: aroma of innovation in health and disease. Chem Biol Interact 2018; 283: 97-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.02.007
Karlberg AT, Magnusson K, Nilsson U. Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 332-340.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00129.x
Christensson JB, Johansson S, Hagvall L, Jonsson C, Borje A, Karlberg AT. Limonene hydroperoxide analogues differ in allergenic activity. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 59: 344-352.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01442.x
Johansson S, Giménez-Arnau E, Grøtli M, Karlberg AT, Börje A. Carbon- and oxygen-centered radicals are equally important haptens of allylic hydroperoxides in allergic contact dermatitis. Chem Res Toxicol 2008; 21: 1536-1547.
https://doi.org/10.1021/tx800104c
Ogueta IA, Brared Christensson J, Giménez-Arnau E, Brans R, Wilkinson M, Stingeni L, et al. Limonene and linalool hydroperoxides review: pros and cons for routine patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 87: 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14064
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Bergendorff O, Bjork J, Dahlin J, et al. Patterns of simultaneous contact allergies in patients with contact sensitization to oxidised linalool and oxidised limonene. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90: 134-142.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14445
Natsch A, Nägelin M, Leijs H, van Strien M, Giménez-Arnau E, Vey M, et al. Exposure source for skin sensitizing hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool remains elusive: an analytical market surveillance. Food ChemToxicol 2019; 127: 156-162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.03.028
Elliott JF, Ramzy A, Nilsson U, Moffat W, Suzuki K. Severe intractable eyelid dermatitis probably caused by exposure to hydroperoxides of linalool in a heavily fragranced shampoo. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 76: 114-115.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12738
Isaksson M, Karlberg AT, Nilsson U. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by oxidized linalool in a deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81: 213-214.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13276
Andersch Bjorkman Y, Hagvall L, Siwmark C, Niklasson B, Karlberg AT, Brared Christensson J. Air-oxidized linalool elicits eczema in allergic patients: a repeated open application test study. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 129-138.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12163
Bennike NH, Palangi L, Christensson JB, Nilsson U, Zachariae C, Johansen JD, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship: a repeated open application test (ROAT) study. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 80: 208-216.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13168
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Kiuru A, Svedman C. Allergic contact dermatitis to linalool hydroperoxides: pitfalls in the diagnostic process - findings from a repeated open application test study. Dermatitis 2024 Feb 21. [Online ahead of print].
https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2023.0286
de Groot AC, Schmidt E. Essential oils, Part VI: sandalwood oil, ylang-ylang oil, and jasmine absolute. Dermatitis 2017; 28: 14-21.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000241
de Groot AC, Schmidt E. Tea tree oil: contact allergy and chemical composition. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75: 129-143.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12591
de Groot A, Schmidt E. Essential oils, Part V: peppermint oil, lavender oil, and lemongrass oil. Dermatitis 2016; 27: 325-332.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000218
Chemotechnique MB Diagnostics AB, Patch test products and reference manual. Available from: http://www.chemotechnique.se/products/product-search-/?search=&series=Series.
Warshaw EM, Zug KA, Belsito DV, Fowler JF Jr, DeKoven JG, Sasseville D, et al. Positive patch-test reactions to essential oils in consecutive patients from North America and Central Europe. Dermatitis 2017; 28: 246-252.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000293
Atwater AR, Ward JM, Liu B, Green CL, Belsito DV, Sasseville D, et al. Fragrance- and botanical-related allergy and associated concomitant reactions: a retrospective analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data 2007-2016. Dermatitis 2021; 32: 42-52.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000661
Karlberg AT. Contact allergy to colophony: chemical identifications of allergens, sensitization experiments and clinical experiences. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1988; 139: 1-43.
Karlberg AT, Bergstedt E, Boman A, Bohlinder K, Lidén C, Lars J, et al. Is abietic acid the allergenic component of colophony? Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13: 209-215.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02552.x
Johansen JD, Heydorn S, Menné T. Oak moss extracts in the diagnosis of fragrance contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 46: 157-161.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460306.x
Paulsen E, Andersen F. Fragrant and sticky allergens from the pinewood: cohabiting and coreacting. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81: 374-377.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13348
Uter W, Schmidt E, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. Contact sensitization to tree moss (Evernia furfuracea extract, INCI) is heterogeneous. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67: 36-41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02064.x
Sukakul T, Charoenpipatsin N, Svedman C, Boonchai W. Prevalence, concomitant reactions, and factors associated with fragrance allergy in Thailand. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 84: 175-182.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13723
Bauer A, Geier J, Schreiber S, Schubert S, IVDK. Contact sensitization to plants of the Compositae family: data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) from 2007 to 2016. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 80: 222-227.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13169
Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Colophonium and Compositae mix as markers of fragrance allergy: cross-reactivity between fragrance terpenes, colophonium and compositae plant extracts. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53: 285-291.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00704.x
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Svedman C. Use of sorbitan sesquioleate in patch test preparations and patch testing with the substance: what do our results mean? Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88: 134-138.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14239
de Groot A, Gilissen L, Geier J, Orton D, Goossens A. Adding sorbitan sesquioleate to the European baseline series: necessary, reasonable, or unavoidable? Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81: 221-225.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13332
Mowitz M, Svedman C, Zimerson E, Bruze M. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71: 289-294.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12300
Bruze M. Thoughts on how to improve the quality of multicentre patch test studies. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 168-174.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12507
Luu H, Mowitz M, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Isaksson M, Svedman C. A comparative study between the two patch-test systems Finn chambers and Finn chambers AQUA. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 84: 290-298.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13766
Bruze M, Mowitz M, Ofenloch R, Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL, Elsner P, et al. The significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to fragrance mix I-EDEN Fragrance Study Group. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81: 104-109.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13253
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch R, Bruze M, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, Elsner P, et al. Prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in the general population of five European countries: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 1411-1419.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14151
Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test® and Trolab® test material. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 63: 248-253.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01776.x
Lazarov A, David M, Abraham D, Trattner A. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56: 140-145.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01025.x
Hamann C. New Fragrance Mix I formulation in TRUE Test. Br J Dermatol 2016; 175: 824.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14663
The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Off J Eur Union 2009: L342: 59-209.
Api AM, Basketter D, Bridges J, Cadby P, Ellis G, Gilmour N, et al. Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2020; 118: 104805.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104805
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. Opinion on Skin Sensitisation Quantitative Risk Assessment for Fragrance Ingredients (QRA2). SCCS/1589/17 2018. Available from https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-08/sccs_o_211_0.pdf.
Api AM, Belsito D, Bickers D, Bruze M, Calow P, Greim H, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of contact sensitization: clinical data to assess utility of the model. Dermatitis 2010; 21: 207-213.
https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2010.10032
Sukakul T, Uter W, Goncalo M, Huggard J, Ljubojevic Hadzavdic S, Schuttelaar MLA, et al. Results of patch testing with five fragrance materials hitherto not tested: a dose-finding study in the clinical population. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90: 566-573.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14525
van Amerongen CCA, Ofenloch RF, Cazzaniga S, Elsner P, Gonçalo M, Naldi L, et al. Skin exposure to scented products used in daily life and fragrance contact allergy in the European general population: The EDEN Fragrance Study. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 84: 385-394.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13807
Couteau C, Morin T, Diarra H, Coiffard L. Influence of cosmetic type and distribution channel on the presence of regulated fragrance allergens: study of 2044 commercial products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2020; 59: 101-108.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-020-08790-w
Sukakul T, Pruksaeakanan C, Bunyavaree M, Boonchai W. Contact allergens in natural cosmetics: a market survey. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022; 21: 2671-2673.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14411
Bonchak JG, Prouty ME, de la Feld SF. Prevalence of contact allergens in personal care products for babies and children. Dermatitis 2018; 29: 81-84.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000348
Botvid S, Simonsen AB, Jørgensen C, Müller S, Kirkeby CS, Christensen AB, et al. Fragrance allergens in cosmetic products marketed for children in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 89: 374-381.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14397
Low KY, Wallace M. Prevalence of potential contact allergens in baby cosmetic products. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019; 44: 411-413.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.13767
Nardelli A, D'Hooghe E, Drieghe J, Dooms M, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis from fragrance components in specific topical pharmaceutical products in Belgium. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 60: 303-313.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01542.x
Wieck S, Olsson O, Kummerer K, Klaschka U. Fragrance allergens in household detergents. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2018; 97: 163-169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.06.015
Desmedt B, Marcelis Q, Zhilivoda D, Deconinck E. Sensitizing fragrances in absorbent hygiene products. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 82: 279-282.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13472
Soriano LF, Soriano SK, Buckley DA. Dog cosmetics: another unexpected source of allergen exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88: 496-499.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14307
Api AM, Bartlett A, Belsito D, Botelho D, Bruze M, Bryant-Freidrich A, et al. Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, l-carvone, CAS Registry Number 6485-40-1. Food Chem Toxicol 2024; 183 Suppl 1: 114505.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2024.114505
Adwa U, Antelmi A, Sukakul T, Dahlin J, Bruze M, Svedman C. Oral lichenoid lesions in two snuff users with contact allergy to carvone. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90: 74-78.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14448
Keller CL, Doppalapudi KR, Woodroffe JD, Harvey BG. Solvent-free dehydration, cyclization, and hydrogenation of linalool with a dual heterogeneous catalyst system to generate a high-performance sustainable aviation fuel. Commun Chem 2022; 5: 113.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00725-0
Trattner A, David M, Lazarov A. Occupational contact dermatitis due to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 282-284.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01275.x
Brans R, Schröder-Kraft C, Bauer A, Weisshaar E, Skudlik C, Geier J. Contact sensitizations in massage therapists with occupational contact dermatitis: patch test data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, 2008-2020. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88: 43-53.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14218
Montgomery RL, Agius R, Wilkinson SM, Carder M. UK trends of allergic occupational skin disease attributed to fragrances 1996-2015. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78: 33-40.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12902
Antelmi A, Sukakul T, Mowitz M, Svedman C. Occupational contact dermatitis due to "bath bombs". Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83: 247-249.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13588
Ibler KS, Jemec GB, Garvey LH, Agner T. Prevalence of delayed-type and immediate-type hypersensitivity in healthcare workers with hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75: 223-229.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12587
Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, et al. Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 79: 149-156.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13042
Voller LM, Schlarbaum JP, Hylwa SA. Allergenic ingredients in health care hand sanitizers in the United States. Dermatitis 2021; 32: 151-159.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000567
Hamnerius N, Dahlin J, Bruze M, Nilsson K, Sukakul T, Svedman C. Colophonium-related allergic contact dermatitis caused by medical adhesive tape used to prevent skin lesions in soldiers. Acta Derm Venereol 2023; 103: adv18428.
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v103.18428
Eriksson JTB, Isaksson M, Engfeldt M, Dahlin J, Tegner Y, Ofenloch R, et al. Contact allergy in Swedish professional ice hockey players. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90: 574-584.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14529
Paulsen E. The sesquiterpene lactone mix: A review of past, present and future aspects. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 89: 434-441.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14419
Punchihewa N, Palmer A, Nixon R. Allergic contact dermatitis to compositae: an Australian case series. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 87: 356-362.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14162
Dendooven E, Foubert K, Goossens A, Gilles P, De Borggraeve W, Pieters L, et al. Concomitant positive patch test reactions in FreeStyle-allergic patients sensitized to isobornyl acrylate. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 84: 166-174.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13706
Ulriksdotter J, Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Ofenloch R, Svedman C. Contact allergy to allergens in the Swedish baseline series overrepresented in diabetes patients with skin reactions to medical devices: a retrospective study from southern Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol 2024; 104: adv19676.
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.19676
Bruze M, Marmgren V, Antelmi A, Hindsén Stenström M, Svedman C, Zimersson E, et al. Contact allergy to oxidized linalool and oxidized limonene is over-represented in individuals with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. Acta Derm Venereol 2021; 101: adv00454.
https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3799
Marmgren V, Mowitz M, Zimerson E, Hindsén M, Bruze M. Contact allergy to fragrance mix I and its components in individuals with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85: 660-670.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13958
Pigatto P, Bigardi A, Legori A, Valsecchi R, Picardo M. Cross-reactions in patch testing and photopatch testing with ketoprofen, thiaprophenic acid, and cinnamic aldehyde. Am J Contact Dermat 1996; 7: 220-223.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-199612000-00004
Devleeschouwer V, Roelandts R, Garmyn M, Goossens A. Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen: results of (photo) patch testing and follow-up of 42 patients. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 159-166.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01296.x
Bruze M, Hopkins K, Dahlin J, Olsson K, Åstrand J, Svedman C, et al. Increased rates of fragrance allergy in fibromyalgia individuals tested with the Swedish baseline patch test series. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37: 104-113.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18562
Geier J, Ballmer-Weber B, Buhl T, Rieker-Schwienbacher J, Mahler V, Dickel H, et al. Is benzyl alcohol a significant contact sensitizer? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36: 866-872.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17968
Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M, Fischer T, Elsner P, Burrows D, et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Am J Contact Dermat 1996; 7: 77-83.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thanisorn Sukakul, Magnus Bruze, Cecilia Svedman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized ActaDV contents is available freely online. The Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica owns the copyright for all material published until volume 88 (2008) and as from volume 89 (2009) the journal has been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work.
Unless otherwise specified, all Open Access articles are published under CC-BY-NC licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
